Qatari royals halt British flight
Aug 6th 2007 | 7:19 pm
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:49:01 -0500, "TMOliver"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Dave Witmarsh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected].. .
>> On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:03:38 +0100, hummingbird
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>I've a feeling they're going to find that they won't make much
>>>>headway here, though. Unlike the British, we're not a bunch of
>>>>eunuchs who are wracked with politically correct, postcolonial
>>>>guilt and are in the process of committing cultural suicide.
>>>
>>>Ouch!
>>>I'm British and often see much of America through the same prism.
>>
>> Interesting view. Think about the different ways that your two
>> nations react to terrorist attacks (ie, New York and the more recent
>> Tube bombings). One nation beats its breasts and wails and moans and
>> cries and whines for years, the British take it on the chin and get on
>> with fixing things quietly and without fuss.
>>
>
>Take it on the chin?
>
> My sweet ass! After reading the moans and groans and massive bewailing
>over your recent floods,
SPANK!!! Here's a clue: when I wrote "the different ways that your
two nations react" did it not sink in to your brittle, hollow skull
that I am neither American nor British?
>by our normal standards little more than rising
>creeks and stopped up storm drains, the rumors of the Nanny State have
>certainly come true. You would have thought that Noah was afloat and
>drifting through the streets of Oxford. My neighbor, just returned from a
>conference in the town said it was a bit damp, but no worse than when Waco
>Creek carried off the lumber yard and blocked the Clay Street Diversion
>Channel, drowning a couple of unsuspecting teenage paint sniffers "huffing"
>under a bridge. Until the TV pictures came along, a few deep puddles and a
>stagnant backup or two, your media were trying to convince us it was the Ole
>Mississip' in full spate, carrying off live stock and outhouses on the crest
>of the flood. No such luck, although some of us were waiting for Fleet
>Ditch to reemerge in daylight after a long absence and scour the Augean
>Stables of the neighborhood.
>
>For us, come the occasional monsoon, "Boil Water" orders are the norm for
>countless rural and small time 'Merkins. From the sounds of things, you
>Brits were awesomely inconvenienced waiting for bottled water deliveries.
>As a comparison, the loss of life (admittedly all too often fools attempting
>to drive across "Low Water Crossings" topped with water running full bore)
>in this Summer's floods in Central Texas alone far outweighed any human
>casualties in the UK. As for livestock, we haven't even gotten around to
>counting cows headed out into the Gulf yet. Combined with your hoof and
>mouth case, you can expect to pay more for beef this Winter (and even more
>because of foolish decisions to encourage - by tax subsidy - distilling
>ethanol from the corn used to feed livestock, running the price of cattle
>and hog feeding (and the market price at the butcher's counter) into the
>stratosphere.
>
>Then there were your complaints of "local authorities not clearing the
>drains". Typical British understatement, or an admission that in the
>Scuttled H'aisles you tiresome twits and gormless wankers have surrendered
>responsibility for local government to some amorphous (and ineffective
>higher authority)?
>
>That's our battle, as the US media fails to understand that in ain't the
>federal government (and the US taxpayer) that is responsible for and should
>rebuild the bridge in Minneapolis, but the Minnesota Highway Department that
>*****ed up, and the folks in Minnesota who should be faced with the bill.
>The US gives states money to build Interstate Highways, and then leaves the
>states to keep'em up. But then, Minnesota, home of the "Farm Labor" party,
>the closest thing we have to Pabulum-nourished Utopians, are always looking
>for others to cure their self-induced and delusional lack of accountability.
>
>A few "Town Councilors" hung from convenient lampposts, and next Summer the
>storm drains will be clear!
>
>A paredon los aristos!
>
>;-P TMO
>
Hmmm, I certainly pressed your buttons there, didn't I you poor
delicate little merkin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Dave Witmarsh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected].. .
>> On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:03:38 +0100, hummingbird
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>I've a feeling they're going to find that they won't make much
>>>>headway here, though. Unlike the British, we're not a bunch of
>>>>eunuchs who are wracked with politically correct, postcolonial
>>>>guilt and are in the process of committing cultural suicide.
>>>
>>>Ouch!
>>>I'm British and often see much of America through the same prism.
>>
>> Interesting view. Think about the different ways that your two
>> nations react to terrorist attacks (ie, New York and the more recent
>> Tube bombings). One nation beats its breasts and wails and moans and
>> cries and whines for years, the British take it on the chin and get on
>> with fixing things quietly and without fuss.
>>
>
>Take it on the chin?
>
> My sweet ass! After reading the moans and groans and massive bewailing
>over your recent floods,
SPANK!!! Here's a clue: when I wrote "the different ways that your
two nations react" did it not sink in to your brittle, hollow skull
that I am neither American nor British?
>by our normal standards little more than rising
>creeks and stopped up storm drains, the rumors of the Nanny State have
>certainly come true. You would have thought that Noah was afloat and
>drifting through the streets of Oxford. My neighbor, just returned from a
>conference in the town said it was a bit damp, but no worse than when Waco
>Creek carried off the lumber yard and blocked the Clay Street Diversion
>Channel, drowning a couple of unsuspecting teenage paint sniffers "huffing"
>under a bridge. Until the TV pictures came along, a few deep puddles and a
>stagnant backup or two, your media were trying to convince us it was the Ole
>Mississip' in full spate, carrying off live stock and outhouses on the crest
>of the flood. No such luck, although some of us were waiting for Fleet
>Ditch to reemerge in daylight after a long absence and scour the Augean
>Stables of the neighborhood.
>
>For us, come the occasional monsoon, "Boil Water" orders are the norm for
>countless rural and small time 'Merkins. From the sounds of things, you
>Brits were awesomely inconvenienced waiting for bottled water deliveries.
>As a comparison, the loss of life (admittedly all too often fools attempting
>to drive across "Low Water Crossings" topped with water running full bore)
>in this Summer's floods in Central Texas alone far outweighed any human
>casualties in the UK. As for livestock, we haven't even gotten around to
>counting cows headed out into the Gulf yet. Combined with your hoof and
>mouth case, you can expect to pay more for beef this Winter (and even more
>because of foolish decisions to encourage - by tax subsidy - distilling
>ethanol from the corn used to feed livestock, running the price of cattle
>and hog feeding (and the market price at the butcher's counter) into the
>stratosphere.
>
>Then there were your complaints of "local authorities not clearing the
>drains". Typical British understatement, or an admission that in the
>Scuttled H'aisles you tiresome twits and gormless wankers have surrendered
>responsibility for local government to some amorphous (and ineffective
>higher authority)?
>
>That's our battle, as the US media fails to understand that in ain't the
>federal government (and the US taxpayer) that is responsible for and should
>rebuild the bridge in Minneapolis, but the Minnesota Highway Department that
>*****ed up, and the folks in Minnesota who should be faced with the bill.
>The US gives states money to build Interstate Highways, and then leaves the
>states to keep'em up. But then, Minnesota, home of the "Farm Labor" party,
>the closest thing we have to Pabulum-nourished Utopians, are always looking
>for others to cure their self-induced and delusional lack of accountability.
>
>A few "Town Councilors" hung from convenient lampposts, and next Summer the
>storm drains will be clear!
>
>A paredon los aristos!
>
>;-P TMO
>
Hmmm, I certainly pressed your buttons there, didn't I you poor
delicate little merkin
Aug 8th 2007 | 6:58 pm
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight
On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>:> IMHO it is
>>:> daft
>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>
>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ,
>>right?
>
>
> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>
> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several reasons
> why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
> Why don't you read it?
I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are infamous
for posting in alt.comp.freeware
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>:> IMHO it is
>>:> daft
>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>
>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ,
>>right?
>
>
> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>
> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several reasons
> why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
> Why don't you read it?
I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are infamous
for posting in alt.comp.freeware
Aug 8th 2007 | 7:01 pm
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight
On 06 Aug 17:15, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:24:28 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>>On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:03:38 +0100 hummingbird
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>:>On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:02:11 -0000 'Geoff Miller'
>>:>posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>:>>Jim Davis <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>:>>> Their seat assignments were on their boarding passes.
>>:>>> They could have complained *before* boarding the plane.
>>
>>:>>Members of Islamic cultures have learned that they can
>>:>>often get their way by making a public scene and putting
>>:>>members of a European culture on the defensive. Any number
>>:>>of examples of this can be found in Melanie Phillips' book
>>:>>_Londonistan_.
>>
>>:>If you knew that Melanie Phillips is jewish you might consider
>>:>she has an ulterior motive.
>>
>>Typical leftist bigotry.
>
> Rotfl. I've been called many things in my life but rarely Leftist.
> Methinks you are muddled between Left/Right.
>
>>Simply because a person is a Jew the person has an ulterior motive.
>
> For a very vociferous Jewess to write a book called 'Londonistan'
> there's a high likelyhood that she's going to put her own Jewish
> bias into it. Add to that, she appears on a few TV/Radio progs
> occasionally (eg BBC Question Time) and rants about Islam/Moslems.
> Her newspaper columns add further to that view. She promotes the
> view that Islam is trying to take over the world and must be
> stopped any way how.
>
> I'm not saying she's always wrong, only that observers *must* see
> her thru the correct prism and know where she's coming from.
>
>>A very sickening display of antisemitism.
>
> You are indeed sick. I take it from your own name that you are
> Jewish? perhaps even Israeli? so I expect that sort of nonsense
> from you. Get a life.
Hummingbird, haven't we had this discussion only a few months ago in
alt.comp.freeware in which you displayed clear anti-semitism.
IIRC in those threads it was Susan Bugher who was able to quote your
anti-semitic statements which you hide under a false front of anti-
zionism.
We were also treated to you holocaust-denying views.
You are quite sick in your negative views.
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:24:28 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>>On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:03:38 +0100 hummingbird
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>:>On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:02:11 -0000 'Geoff Miller'
>>:>posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>:>>Jim Davis <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>:>>> Their seat assignments were on their boarding passes.
>>:>>> They could have complained *before* boarding the plane.
>>
>>:>>Members of Islamic cultures have learned that they can
>>:>>often get their way by making a public scene and putting
>>:>>members of a European culture on the defensive. Any number
>>:>>of examples of this can be found in Melanie Phillips' book
>>:>>_Londonistan_.
>>
>>:>If you knew that Melanie Phillips is jewish you might consider
>>:>she has an ulterior motive.
>>
>>Typical leftist bigotry.
>
> Rotfl. I've been called many things in my life but rarely Leftist.
> Methinks you are muddled between Left/Right.
>
>>Simply because a person is a Jew the person has an ulterior motive.
>
> For a very vociferous Jewess to write a book called 'Londonistan'
> there's a high likelyhood that she's going to put her own Jewish
> bias into it. Add to that, she appears on a few TV/Radio progs
> occasionally (eg BBC Question Time) and rants about Islam/Moslems.
> Her newspaper columns add further to that view. She promotes the
> view that Islam is trying to take over the world and must be
> stopped any way how.
>
> I'm not saying she's always wrong, only that observers *must* see
> her thru the correct prism and know where she's coming from.
>
>>A very sickening display of antisemitism.
>
> You are indeed sick. I take it from your own name that you are
> Jewish? perhaps even Israeli? so I expect that sort of nonsense
> from you. Get a life.
Hummingbird, haven't we had this discussion only a few months ago in
alt.comp.freeware in which you displayed clear anti-semitism.
IIRC in those threads it was Susan Bugher who was able to quote your
anti-semitic statements which you hide under a false front of anti-
zionism.
We were also treated to you holocaust-denying views.
You are quite sick in your negative views.
Aug 8th 2007 | 7:03 pm
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight
On 02 Aug 22:51, Geoff Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Dave Witmarsh <[email protected]> writes:
>
>: If it'd been up to me, those nitwits would've been soaked down
>: with Mace, *then* handcuffed and dragged off the plane.
>
>> But then, *you* live in a police state, so you'd be used to that
>> sort of action.
>
>
> It still hasn't been explained to my satisfaction why that sort of
> response would make a place a "police state." It seems to me that
> it would mean the police were doing their job. Nothing more,
> nothing less.
>
> To liberals, of course, any sort of police action whatsoever is
> _ipso facto_ evidence of a police state. Unless those people
> themselves need the help of the police, in which case it's suddenly
> a matter of, "'Please to walk in front, sir,' when there's trouble
> in the wind."
>
> Consider what happened: there were unreasonable demands placed on
> the crew of a commercial aircraft because the seating arrangements
> didn't humor their culture. Well, ****** their culture. They were
> on an aircraft belonging to a western airline, not a Middle Eastern
> airline. How does that old saying go? "When in Rome..."?
>
> If a Westerner, particularly an American, were to create a
> newsworthy incident by making an ugly scene and demanding that the
> locals in a foreign country do things "his" way, he'd be raked over
> the coals by the chattering classes in a matter of nanoseconds.
> And rightfully so. But these people are apparently exempt from
> criticism because they're (a) non-Westerners and (b) Muslims.
>
> "Listen up, Habib. Either you and your pals square your asses away
> right quick, or you'll feel the toe of my right Florsheim against
> your glutei as you're unceremoniously booted out the open door of
> my airplane right here and right now, without the benefit of
> stairs. You can walk back to the terminal. Now then, what's it
> going to be?"
>
> Geoff
These are good points, Geoff. I don't expect Hummingbird to accept
any of these facts if they would spoil his argument.
>
>
> Dave Witmarsh <[email protected]> writes:
>
>: If it'd been up to me, those nitwits would've been soaked down
>: with Mace, *then* handcuffed and dragged off the plane.
>
>> But then, *you* live in a police state, so you'd be used to that
>> sort of action.
>
>
> It still hasn't been explained to my satisfaction why that sort of
> response would make a place a "police state." It seems to me that
> it would mean the police were doing their job. Nothing more,
> nothing less.
>
> To liberals, of course, any sort of police action whatsoever is
> _ipso facto_ evidence of a police state. Unless those people
> themselves need the help of the police, in which case it's suddenly
> a matter of, "'Please to walk in front, sir,' when there's trouble
> in the wind."
>
> Consider what happened: there were unreasonable demands placed on
> the crew of a commercial aircraft because the seating arrangements
> didn't humor their culture. Well, ****** their culture. They were
> on an aircraft belonging to a western airline, not a Middle Eastern
> airline. How does that old saying go? "When in Rome..."?
>
> If a Westerner, particularly an American, were to create a
> newsworthy incident by making an ugly scene and demanding that the
> locals in a foreign country do things "his" way, he'd be raked over
> the coals by the chattering classes in a matter of nanoseconds.
> And rightfully so. But these people are apparently exempt from
> criticism because they're (a) non-Westerners and (b) Muslims.
>
> "Listen up, Habib. Either you and your pals square your asses away
> right quick, or you'll feel the toe of my right Florsheim against
> your glutei as you're unceremoniously booted out the open door of
> my airplane right here and right now, without the benefit of
> stairs. You can walk back to the terminal. Now then, what's it
> going to be?"
>
> Geoff
These are good points, Geoff. I don't expect Hummingbird to accept
any of these facts if they would spoil his argument.
Aug 9th 2007 | 11:49 am
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight
"Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>
>>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>:> IMHO it is
>>>:> daft
>>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>>
>>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ,
>>>right?
>>
>>
>> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>>
>> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several reasons
>> why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
>> Why don't you read it?
>
> I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are infamous
> for posting in alt.comp.freeware
Well, well, well. The Hummingbird stalker is back. What happened, run out
of kids to molest?
news:[email protected]...
> On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>
>>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>:> IMHO it is
>>>:> daft
>>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>>
>>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ,
>>>right?
>>
>>
>> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>>
>> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several reasons
>> why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
>> Why don't you read it?
>
> I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are infamous
> for posting in alt.comp.freeware
Well, well, well. The Hummingbird stalker is back. What happened, run out
of kids to molest?
Aug 11th 2007 | 6:03 am
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:49:41 -0500 'Buster'
posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>"Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
>>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>:> IMHO it is
>>>>:> daft
>>>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ,
>>>>right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>>>
>>> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several reasons
>>> why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
>>> Why don't you read it?
>>
>> I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are infamous
>> for posting in alt.comp.freeware
>
>Well, well, well. The Hummingbird stalker is back. What happened, run out
>of kids to molest?
I see you're responding to a certified loony stalker by the name
of Franklin who stalks people on alt.comp.freeware and operates
a Random Rubbish Generator. Enough said jon.
posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>"Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
>>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>:> IMHO it is
>>>>:> daft
>>>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ,
>>>>right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>>>
>>> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several reasons
>>> why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
>>> Why don't you read it?
>>
>> I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are infamous
>> for posting in alt.comp.freeware
>
>Well, well, well. The Hummingbird stalker is back. What happened, run out
>of kids to molest?
I see you're responding to a certified loony stalker by the name
of Franklin who stalks people on alt.comp.freeware and operates
a Random Rubbish Generator. Enough said jon.
Aug 13th 2007 | 5:03 am
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Qatari royals halt British flight - Hummingbird
On Fri 10 Aug 2007 00:49:41, Buster <[email protected]> wrote in
rec.travel.air:
>
> "Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
>>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>:> IMHO it
>>>>:> is daft
>>>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about
>>>>JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ, right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>>>
>>> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several
>>> reasons why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
>>> Why don't you read it?
>>
>> I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are
>> infamous for posting in alt.comp.freeware
>
> Well, well, well. The Hummingbird stalker is back. What happened,
> run out of kids to molest?
>
Hello Buster
As Hummingbird/Chris points out, I am indeed Franklin.
I may be guilty of many things and I may get call many other things but
I'm not too sure I genuinely qualify for the name "certified loony
stalker" which Hummingbird/Chris awards me elsewhere in this thread.
----------
The fact is that over in sunny alt.comp.freeware we have had just about
enough of Hummingbird/Chris. He came along and joined up with Mr Bear
Bottoms about a year ago in an attempt to cause damage to our regular
newsgroup.
Quite honestly you guys in rec.travel.air and rec.travel.europe can have
the pervert back. But if you're wise you won't want to accept our kind
offer of our discarded posters such as Hummingbird/Chris.
Perhaps we can ask the more robust fierce-debating folks in
uk.politics.misc or alt.politics.british to take him. Hummingbird/Chris
honed his argumentative skill there and posted his endless thousands of
messages there too. Maybe the bruisers there can keep him in check.
---------
All this won't much interest many of you who have never been subjected
to Hummingbird/Chris's many foul-mouthed anonymous posts which integrate
nicely with his own posts. But to those who remember him (who could
forget him) it may be of considerable interest. One fine member ("jon")
of alt.comp.freeware did a bit of looking and his findings are in this
must-see post:
"Welcome to a.c.f - Hummingbird: THIS IS YOUR LIFE!"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...d1d4cfe188a6a6
MID <news:[email protected]>
In addition alt.comp.freeware contains ad hoc information about our man
in postings over the last few weeks from "jon" and from myself,
Franklin.
It's clear this Hummingbird/Chris is a danger to any sane newsgroup and
any help from his old sparring partners to halt him is most welcome.
I know some of those who feel they have something to hide will find all
this stuff quite worrying and no doubt will need to tell me so ~ but my
intentions are honorable: the calming of Chris. Fortunately jon has
done some good work and, to Hummingbird/Chris's considerable concern,
has taken some strides forward.
I am not too sure sure what our venue will be for discussions about our
Hummingbird/Chris Millbank but for now free.hipcrime looks like a
stopping off point.
Needless to say I now anticipate some noisy and mendacious postings in
reply from Hummingbird/Chris. We have found that his style seems to be
to protest very loudly about the exact same things he is actually doing
to an even greater extent but covertly. For example, we are now no
doubt going to hear loud protests about cross-posting, or about my
character, or about illegality of posting pubkic info, or whatever he
dreams up.
Thank you for your attention.
Franklin
rec.travel.air:
>
> "Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 07 Aug 01:14, hummingbird <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:56:06 +0300 'Binyamin Dissen'
>>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:55 +0100 hummingbird
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>:> IMHO it
>>>>:> is daft
>>>>:>to jump to rash conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>Except when YOU are jumping to conclusions about
>>>>JOOOOOOOOOZZZZZZ, right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong, idiot. Stop emoting and get a grip.
>>>
>>> I refer you to my previous post in which I gave you several
>>> reasons why Melanie Phillips can't be trusted to be fair.
>>> Why don't you read it?
>>
>> I read it and it seemed like the same horse manure you are
>> infamous for posting in alt.comp.freeware
>
> Well, well, well. The Hummingbird stalker is back. What happened,
> run out of kids to molest?
>
Hello Buster
As Hummingbird/Chris points out, I am indeed Franklin.
I may be guilty of many things and I may get call many other things but
I'm not too sure I genuinely qualify for the name "certified loony
stalker" which Hummingbird/Chris awards me elsewhere in this thread.
----------
The fact is that over in sunny alt.comp.freeware we have had just about
enough of Hummingbird/Chris. He came along and joined up with Mr Bear
Bottoms about a year ago in an attempt to cause damage to our regular
newsgroup.
Quite honestly you guys in rec.travel.air and rec.travel.europe can have
the pervert back. But if you're wise you won't want to accept our kind
offer of our discarded posters such as Hummingbird/Chris.
Perhaps we can ask the more robust fierce-debating folks in
uk.politics.misc or alt.politics.british to take him. Hummingbird/Chris
honed his argumentative skill there and posted his endless thousands of
messages there too. Maybe the bruisers there can keep him in check.
---------
All this won't much interest many of you who have never been subjected
to Hummingbird/Chris's many foul-mouthed anonymous posts which integrate
nicely with his own posts. But to those who remember him (who could
forget him) it may be of considerable interest. One fine member ("jon")
of alt.comp.freeware did a bit of looking and his findings are in this
must-see post:
"Welcome to a.c.f - Hummingbird: THIS IS YOUR LIFE!"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...d1d4cfe188a6a6
MID <news:[email protected]>
In addition alt.comp.freeware contains ad hoc information about our man
in postings over the last few weeks from "jon" and from myself,
Franklin.
It's clear this Hummingbird/Chris is a danger to any sane newsgroup and
any help from his old sparring partners to halt him is most welcome.
I know some of those who feel they have something to hide will find all
this stuff quite worrying and no doubt will need to tell me so ~ but my
intentions are honorable: the calming of Chris. Fortunately jon has
done some good work and, to Hummingbird/Chris's considerable concern,
has taken some strides forward.
I am not too sure sure what our venue will be for discussions about our
Hummingbird/Chris Millbank but for now free.hipcrime looks like a
stopping off point.
Needless to say I now anticipate some noisy and mendacious postings in
reply from Hummingbird/Chris. We have found that his style seems to be
to protest very loudly about the exact same things he is actually doing
to an even greater extent but covertly. For example, we are now no
doubt going to hear loud protests about cross-posting, or about my
character, or about illegality of posting pubkic info, or whatever he
dreams up.
Thank you for your attention.
Franklin
