One post in one thread on one day
Apr 14th 2005 | 11:37 pm
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
One post in one thread on one day
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
> I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
__________________________________________________ _________________
One of (as of 2003) 751,682 residents of San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
> I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
__________________________________________________ _________________
One of (as of 2003) 751,682 residents of San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
Apr 15th 2005 | 1:10 am
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
It can make
>I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
It can make
Apr 15th 2005 | 1:10 am
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
it easier to
>I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
it easier to
Apr 15th 2005 | 1:11 am
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
follow the line
>I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
follow the line
Apr 15th 2005 | 1:12 am
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Padraig Breathnach <[email protected]> wrote:
>follow the line
of a discussion.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
>follow the line
of a discussion.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
Apr 15th 2005 | 11:07 pm
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> It can make
That
__________________________________________________ _________________
A San Franciscan in 47.452 mile² San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> It can make
That
__________________________________________________ _________________
A San Franciscan in 47.452 mile² San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
Apr 15th 2005 | 11:08 pm
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> it easier to
was
__________________________________________________ _________________
A San Franciscan who's visited 49 of 50 US states.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> it easier to
was
__________________________________________________ _________________
A San Franciscan who's visited 49 of 50 US states.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
Apr 15th 2005 | 11:08 pm
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> follow the line
my
__________________________________________________ _________________
A San Franciscan in (where else?) San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> follow the line
my
__________________________________________________ _________________
A San Franciscan in (where else?) San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
Apr 15th 2005 | 11:10 pm
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> of a discussion.
intent.
__________________________________________________ _________________
One of (as of 2003) 751,682 residents of San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
> Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one
>> day, to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple
>> posts on one subject in one day is preferable, please explain
>> why.
>
> of a discussion.
intent.
__________________________________________________ _________________
One of (as of 2003) 751,682 residents of San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net
Apr 16th 2005 | 11:01 am
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
> > I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
>
> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
> to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
> subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
Because it makes it clearer which part of a thread you're responding to,
and if you're using a threaded newsreader, enables you to see who is
responding to what you wrote- which is useful assuming that you don't
always have the time or inclination to read every post.
--
David Horne- www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
> > I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
>
> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
> to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
> subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
Because it makes it clearer which part of a thread you're responding to,
and if you're using a threaded newsreader, enables you to see who is
responding to what you wrote- which is useful assuming that you don't
always have the time or inclination to read every post.
--
David Horne- www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
Apr 16th 2005 | 11:21 am
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
[email protected] (chancellor of the duchy of besses
o' th' barn) wrote:
>Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
>> > I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
>>
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>> to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>> subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
>Because it makes it clearer which part of a thread you're responding to,
>and if you're using a threaded newsreader, enables you to see who is
>responding to what you wrote- which is useful assuming that you don't
>always have the time or inclination to read every post.
I concur.
I add that it is often the most convenient way to compose posts, which
is why I might make a number of contributions to the one thread in the
same day. I am grateful to David for giving me such a clear rationale
for my behaviour.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
o' th' barn) wrote:
>Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
>> > I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
>>
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>> to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>> subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
>Because it makes it clearer which part of a thread you're responding to,
>and if you're using a threaded newsreader, enables you to see who is
>responding to what you wrote- which is useful assuming that you don't
>always have the time or inclination to read every post.
I concur.
I add that it is often the most convenient way to compose posts, which
is why I might make a number of contributions to the one thread in the
same day. I am grateful to David for giving me such a clear rationale
for my behaviour.
--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
Apr 16th 2005 | 3:39 pm
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: One post in one thread on one day
In article <1gv4yih.11tspii1jy15wsN%this_address_is_for_spam@ yahoo.com>,
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn <[email protected]> wrote:
>Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
>> > I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
>>
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>> to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>> subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
>Because it makes it clearer which part of a thread you're responding to,
>and if you're using a threaded newsreader, enables you to see who is
>responding to what you wrote- which is useful assuming that you don't
>always have the time or inclination to read every post.
Well, that makes sense.
-------------
Cut the crap, man!
-------------
Believe me, you don't want to eat piroshkis in Wittenburg!
-------------
Cheers, good night ;-)
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn <[email protected]> wrote:
>Icono Clast <[email protected]> wrote:
>> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote to Icono Clast:
>> > I realise you've got this weird habit of joining all your replies
>>
>> I see no reason, when responding to several in one thread on one day,
>> to create multiple posts. If you think creating multiple posts on one
>> subject in one day is preferable, please explain why.
>Because it makes it clearer which part of a thread you're responding to,
>and if you're using a threaded newsreader, enables you to see who is
>responding to what you wrote- which is useful assuming that you don't
>always have the time or inclination to read every post.
Well, that makes sense.
-------------
Cut the crap, man!
-------------
Believe me, you don't want to eat piroshkis in Wittenburg!
-------------
Cheers, good night ;-)
