In article <[email protected]> , babydriver3
@postmaster.co.uk says...
    >
    > "Dave Frightens Me" <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote in
    > message news:[email protected]...
    > > On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:02:00 +0000, Padraig Breathnach
    > > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > >Fred Bloggs <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >>In article <[email protected]>,
    > > >>[email protected] says...
    > > >>> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > >>>
    > > >>> Peej, you are a tiresome troll, an advocate of race hatred, an
    > > >>> apologist for liars, an offensive interlocutor, and unable to
    > > >>> construct one original argument of your own.
    > > >>>
    > > >>> **** OFF.
    > > >>>
    > > >>>
    > > >>Don't forget "congenitally stupid", it's the defining characteristic.
    > > >
    > > >I never blame people for things like that; it's not their own fault.
    > >
    > > I do. I can't bring myself to accept other's stupidity, but that's
    > > just another prejudice of mine I guess...
    >
    > Congenitally means being born with the condition.
    > In other words the person afflicted has never had any input into their
    > condition.
    > They cannot help being what they are.
    > For example a person born without eyes would be described as congenitally
    > blind, whereas were he born without a hand or foot congenitally lame.

And if such a person were to try to compete with able-bodied people in a
field in which hands, feet or eyes conferred an advantage, he would be
bound to do badly. When peabrain and other stupid people attempt to
compete intellectually with the non-stupid , they come out second best.
The really sad thing is that peabrain is so dsiadvantaged intellectually
that he can't even recognise he's outclassed. It's the reason I'm nice
to him.

    > Were he born without a useful brain we could describe him as Tony Blair or
    > Gordon Brown, neither of whom are to blame for their condition
    > You yourself could claim to be congenitally prejudiced and I would have to
    > give you the benefit of the doubt:-))
    >
    >
    >