The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Mar 21st 2004 | 2:44 pm
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
erikc <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>. ..
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Lina Morgan wrote:
> >>
> >>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
> >>>>
> >>>> (Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve
> >>>> endings, let alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus
> >>>> has 100,000,000,000 more nerves in it that the vagina. The
> >>>> vagina is "numb" for a reason, it has to do with birth)
> >>>
> >>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused
> >>> for pleasure.
> >>
> >>What's wrong with pleasure?
> >
> >We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
>
> Do us all a favour and off yourself as soon as possible. Don't want to miss
> out on all that afterlife fun, don'tcha?
Christians claim to believe in a glorious afterlife, but no (sane)
Christian has ever killed themselves to get there quicker. It's proof
that Christians don't truly believe in that bullshit!
Dancing Blasphemer
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Lina Morgan wrote:
> >>
> >>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
> >>>>
> >>>> (Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve
> >>>> endings, let alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus
> >>>> has 100,000,000,000 more nerves in it that the vagina. The
> >>>> vagina is "numb" for a reason, it has to do with birth)
> >>>
> >>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused
> >>> for pleasure.
> >>
> >>What's wrong with pleasure?
> >
> >We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
>
> Do us all a favour and off yourself as soon as possible. Don't want to miss
> out on all that afterlife fun, don'tcha?
Christians claim to believe in a glorious afterlife, but no (sane)
Christian has ever killed themselves to get there quicker. It's proof
that Christians don't truly believe in that bullshit!
Dancing Blasphemer
Mar 22nd 2004 | 12:15 am
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
[email protected] (Dancing Blasphemer) wrote in message news:<[email protected]. com>...
[snip]
> Christians claim to believe in a glorious afterlife, but no (sane)
> Christian has ever killed themselves to get there quicker. It's proof
> that Christians don't truly believe in that bullshit!
Um. Hate to burst your bubble but first, the basic belief is that
doing such is a guaranteed way to ensure you won't get there. Second,
actually plenty of folks have done so, often in groups. So your
"proof" doesn't exist.
[snip]
> Christians claim to believe in a glorious afterlife, but no (sane)
> Christian has ever killed themselves to get there quicker. It's proof
> that Christians don't truly believe in that bullshit!
Um. Hate to burst your bubble but first, the basic belief is that
doing such is a guaranteed way to ensure you won't get there. Second,
actually plenty of folks have done so, often in groups. So your
"proof" doesn't exist.
Mar 22nd 2004 | 8:00 am
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 20:01:51 +0000, erikc <[email protected]>,
Message ID: <[email protected]> wrote in
alt.atheism;
>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, "Icarus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>>>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>>>> with the problem.
>>> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
>>> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
>>> wrong with it.
>>Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>Some Pagans like to do that. I understand that they take thier religion
>-very- seriously..
/cue baaaaddd visual of lots of dour-faced people conducting oral sex.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
Message ID: <[email protected]> wrote in
alt.atheism;
>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, "Icarus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>>> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>>>> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>>>> with the problem.
>>> You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
>>> glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
>>> wrong with it.
>>Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>Some Pagans like to do that. I understand that they take thier religion
>-very- seriously..
/cue baaaaddd visual of lots of dour-faced people conducting oral sex.
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
Mar 27th 2004 | 3:53 am
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Woden <[email protected]> wrote:
>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism with
>the following discourse:
>> Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>>> (Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve
>>>>> endings, let alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus
>>>>> has 100,000,000,000 more nerves in it that the vagina. The
>>>>> vagina is "numb" for a reason, it has to do with birth)
>>>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused
>>>> for pleasure.
>>>What's wrong with pleasure?
>>
>> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
>Why don't you just save yourself for the next life and leave the rest of
>us to live in this one the way we want?
No need to worry, I'm already saved, by the glory and grace of Jesus
Christ.
As for you, I'll be laughing as your burn eternally in hell.
>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism with
>the following discourse:
>> Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>>> (Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve
>>>>> endings, let alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus
>>>>> has 100,000,000,000 more nerves in it that the vagina. The
>>>>> vagina is "numb" for a reason, it has to do with birth)
>>>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused
>>>> for pleasure.
>>>What's wrong with pleasure?
>>
>> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
>Why don't you just save yourself for the next life and leave the rest of
>us to live in this one the way we want?
No need to worry, I'm already saved, by the glory and grace of Jesus
Christ.
As for you, I'll be laughing as your burn eternally in hell.
Mar 27th 2004 | 3:54 am
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
devil <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan wrote:
>> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
>Welcome to the eighteenth century.
>Even that old fart in Rome who refuses to die would disgree with you on
>that one.
I hope lightning strikes you soon.
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:58 +0000, Lina Morgan wrote:
>> We are not in this life to seek pleasure. That is for the next life.
>Welcome to the eighteenth century.
>Even that old fart in Rome who refuses to die would disgree with you on
>that one.
I hope lightning strikes you soon.
Mar 27th 2004 | 3:56 am
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
[email protected] (me) wrote:
>[email protected] (Dancing Blasphemer) wrote in message news:<[email protected]. com>...
>[snip]
>> Christians claim to believe in a glorious afterlife, but no (sane)
>> Christian has ever killed themselves to get there quicker. It's proof
>> that Christians don't truly believe in that bullshit!
> Um. Hate to burst your bubble but first, the basic belief is that
>doing such is a guaranteed way to ensure you won't get there. Second,
>actually plenty of folks have done so, often in groups. So your
>"proof" doesn't exist.
Exactly. Suicide is a mortal sin. As such, it means eternity in hell
guaranteed.
Only atheists commit suicide. Nobody who believes in God could ever
do such a horrible thing which is against His laws.
Atheists commit suicide because their lives of sin, greed, and
self-gratification are a dead end that is virtually guaranteed to lead
to suicide.
>[email protected] (Dancing Blasphemer) wrote in message news:<[email protected]. com>...
>[snip]
>> Christians claim to believe in a glorious afterlife, but no (sane)
>> Christian has ever killed themselves to get there quicker. It's proof
>> that Christians don't truly believe in that bullshit!
> Um. Hate to burst your bubble but first, the basic belief is that
>doing such is a guaranteed way to ensure you won't get there. Second,
>actually plenty of folks have done so, often in groups. So your
>"proof" doesn't exist.
Exactly. Suicide is a mortal sin. As such, it means eternity in hell
guaranteed.
Only atheists commit suicide. Nobody who believes in God could ever
do such a horrible thing which is against His laws.
Atheists commit suicide because their lives of sin, greed, and
self-gratification are a dead end that is virtually guaranteed to lead
to suicide.
Mar 27th 2004 | 3:57 am
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
erikc <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:18:25 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>[email protected] (Tom) wrote:
>>>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<s2g4509ftnv0motdjl8m89cav9pphu506o@netscape. net>...
>>>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>> >
>>>> >(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>>> >alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>>> >more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a reason,
>>>> >it has to do with birth)
>>>>
>>>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>>>> pleasure.
>>>oh lina, what is the population of the world compared to 2000 years
>>>ago.
>>>any quesses? im hoping YOU'RE not still procreating. we have enough
>>>idiots in the world already.
>>>next time YOU'RE in confession, why don't you ask the priest to show
>>>you how to create love in your heart instead of hate?
>>No need for that, my priest and my entire congregation love me and respect
>>me and hold me in the highest regard. I am a very loving person, of that
>>there is no doubt. And I love God above all else, as is commanded.
>Oh really? If you are so loving, why aren't you showing that here? Oh, I
>forgot. You must be competing with Betty Bowers for the title of "America's
>Best Christian".
Love doesn't mean putting up with evil. On the contrary, it means
standing strong against evil, resisting it, and speaking up against
it.
Love the sinner, Hate the sin.
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:18:25 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>[email protected] (Tom) wrote:
>>>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<s2g4509ftnv0motdjl8m89cav9pphu506o@netscape. net>...
>>>> [email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>> >
>>>> >(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>>> >alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>>> >more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a reason,
>>>> >it has to do with birth)
>>>>
>>>> Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>>>> pleasure.
>>>oh lina, what is the population of the world compared to 2000 years
>>>ago.
>>>any quesses? im hoping YOU'RE not still procreating. we have enough
>>>idiots in the world already.
>>>next time YOU'RE in confession, why don't you ask the priest to show
>>>you how to create love in your heart instead of hate?
>>No need for that, my priest and my entire congregation love me and respect
>>me and hold me in the highest regard. I am a very loving person, of that
>>there is no doubt. And I love God above all else, as is commanded.
>Oh really? If you are so loving, why aren't you showing that here? Oh, I
>forgot. You must be competing with Betty Bowers for the title of "America's
>Best Christian".
Love doesn't mean putting up with evil. On the contrary, it means
standing strong against evil, resisting it, and speaking up against
it.
Love the sinner, Hate the sin.
Mar 27th 2004 | 3:58 am
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Beowulf <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
><[email protected]> ejaculated:
>>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a reason,
>>>it has to do with birth)
>>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography. Go to
>>confession!
>Does this injunction apply just to the laity or to the ass-****ing
>pedophile priests, too?
You must have fallen prey to all the brainwashing the media has done
to you.
>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:58:34 +0000, Lina Morgan
><[email protected]> ejaculated:
>>[email protected] (Ginger Grant) wrote:
>>>Yeah, and I know: she has NEVER faked it with you, right? LOL!
>>>(Pssst: the vagina, the birth canal, does not have nerve endings, let
>>>alone enought to produce an orgasm. Your anus has 100,000,000,000
>>>more nerves in it that the vagina. The vagina is "numb" for a reason,
>>>it has to do with birth)
>>Exactly. These things exist for procreation, not to be abused for
>>pleasure. These people have been watching too much pornography. Go to
>>confession!
>Does this injunction apply just to the laity or to the ass-****ing
>pedophile priests, too?
You must have fallen prey to all the brainwashing the media has done
to you.
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:05 am
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Icarus"
><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... Lina Morgan wrote:
> ...
> ... >> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
> ... >> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
> ... >> with the problem.
> ... >
> ... > You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
> ... > glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
> ... > wrong with it.
> ...
> ... Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>Missionary position, no lights whatsoever - only ! LOL
You need more? You must be a slut.
>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Icarus"
><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
> ... Lina Morgan wrote:
> ...
> ... >> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
> ... >> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
> ... >> with the problem.
> ... >
> ... > You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
> ... > glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
> ... > wrong with it.
> ...
> ... Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>Missionary position, no lights whatsoever - only ! LOL
You need more? You must be a slut.
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:05 am
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
erikc <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:20:20 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>>> Ronald <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> "Ginger Grant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> Great article, thanks so much for posting it! I hope all
>>>>>>> the men read it. Men know so little about female sexuality.
>>>>>>> Most don't even know the difference between a clitoral
>>>>>>> orgasm and a vaginal one.
>>>>>> Umm, okay... but the real difference between the vaginal
>>>>>> orgasm & the clitoral orgasm: THE VAGINAL ORGASM DOE NOT
>>>>>> EXIST.
>>>>> Yeah right, tell that to my wife whose vagina thobs and
>>>>> quivers wildly during orgasm with no clitoral stimulation.
>>>>> She also ejaculates, but I suppose you're going to tell me
>>>>> there's no such thing as female ejaculation.
>>>>> Just because you're incapable of experiencing something
>>>>> doesn't mean others can't.
>>>> Any woman who puts on that kind of show in the bedroom is not
>>>> a decent woman.
>>>How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing indecent
>>>about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one with the problem.
>>You're right, when it is done the right way, for the glorification of God,
>>the way he commands it, there is nothing wrong with it.
>Can you spell out in detail how that is?
No need for details. Sex for God is the only valid sex.
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:20:20 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>Lina Morgan wrote:
>>>> Ronald <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> "Ginger Grant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> Great article, thanks so much for posting it! I hope all
>>>>>>> the men read it. Men know so little about female sexuality.
>>>>>>> Most don't even know the difference between a clitoral
>>>>>>> orgasm and a vaginal one.
>>>>>> Umm, okay... but the real difference between the vaginal
>>>>>> orgasm & the clitoral orgasm: THE VAGINAL ORGASM DOE NOT
>>>>>> EXIST.
>>>>> Yeah right, tell that to my wife whose vagina thobs and
>>>>> quivers wildly during orgasm with no clitoral stimulation.
>>>>> She also ejaculates, but I suppose you're going to tell me
>>>>> there's no such thing as female ejaculation.
>>>>> Just because you're incapable of experiencing something
>>>>> doesn't mean others can't.
>>>> Any woman who puts on that kind of show in the bedroom is not
>>>> a decent woman.
>>>How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing indecent
>>>about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one with the problem.
>>You're right, when it is done the right way, for the glorification of God,
>>the way he commands it, there is nothing wrong with it.
>Can you spell out in detail how that is?
No need for details. Sex for God is the only valid sex.
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:06 am
#101
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
erikc <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:57:06 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>Ronald <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>"Ginger Grant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> > Great article, thanks so much for posting it! I hope all the men read
>>>it.
>>>> > Men know so little about female sexuality. Most don't even know the
>>>> > difference between a clitoral orgasm and a vaginal one.
>>>> Umm, okay... but the real difference between the vaginal orgasm & the
>>>> clitoral orgasm: THE VAGINAL ORGASM DOE NOT EXIST.
>>>Yeah right, tell that to my wife whose vagina thobs and quivers wildly
>>>during orgasm with no clitoral stimulation. She also ejaculates, but I
>>>suppose you're going to tell me there's no such thing as female ejaculation.
>>>Just because you're incapable of experiencing something doesn't mean others
>>>can't.
>>Any woman who puts on that kind of show in the bedroom is not a decent
>>woman. Where did you find your wife, a trailer park?
>Do you even have a husband? Would anybody want to marry you? A boyfriend?
>Have you ever even had sex? Enquiring minds want to know .
I have been happily married for 20 years to my high school sweetheart.
>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:57:06 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>Ronald <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>"Ginger Grant" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> > Great article, thanks so much for posting it! I hope all the men read
>>>it.
>>>> > Men know so little about female sexuality. Most don't even know the
>>>> > difference between a clitoral orgasm and a vaginal one.
>>>> Umm, okay... but the real difference between the vaginal orgasm & the
>>>> clitoral orgasm: THE VAGINAL ORGASM DOE NOT EXIST.
>>>Yeah right, tell that to my wife whose vagina thobs and quivers wildly
>>>during orgasm with no clitoral stimulation. She also ejaculates, but I
>>>suppose you're going to tell me there's no such thing as female ejaculation.
>>>Just because you're incapable of experiencing something doesn't mean others
>>>can't.
>>Any woman who puts on that kind of show in the bedroom is not a decent
>>woman. Where did you find your wife, a trailer park?
>Do you even have a husband? Would anybody want to marry you? A boyfriend?
>Have you ever even had sex? Enquiring minds want to know .
I have been happily married for 20 years to my high school sweetheart.
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:08 am
#102
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
erikc <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:20:38 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>steve sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>In article <[email protected] >,
>>> Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Exactly. Thank you. Now can you all stop posting such filth. Children
>>>> read these groups!
>>>Bull****INGshit, they are too busy looking at all the pictures in
>>>alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cheerleaders and
>>>alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.spanking
>>You are projecting.
>Why don't you check it our. Might open your eyes to a whole new world out
>there.
My eyes are open to God's glory, which is all I need.
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:20:38 +0000, Lina Morgan <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>steve sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>In article <[email protected] >,
>>> Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Exactly. Thank you. Now can you all stop posting such filth. Children
>>>> read these groups!
>>>Bull****INGshit, they are too busy looking at all the pictures in
>>>alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cheerleaders and
>>>alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.spanking
>>You are projecting.
>Why don't you check it our. Might open your eyes to a whole new world out
>there.
My eyes are open to God's glory, which is all I need.
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:10 am
#103
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Icarus <[email protected]> wrote:
>Lina Morgan wrote:
>> Please do not post filth like this.
>Exactly how twisted do you have to be to regard sexual pleasure as
>"filth"?
Sex is only for procreation. Anything else is doing it like the
animals in the mud. Certainly sounds filthy to me!
>Lina Morgan wrote:
>> Please do not post filth like this.
>Exactly how twisted do you have to be to regard sexual pleasure as
>"filth"?
Sex is only for procreation. Anything else is doing it like the
animals in the mud. Certainly sounds filthy to me!
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:10 am
#104
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
Woden <[email protected]> wrote:
>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism with
>the following discourse:
>> Mrs. Pudenda Fallopini <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>(snip for bevity)
>>>>Please do not post filth like this.
>>>Why, it makes you horny?
>>
>> Projecting again? You sound like a real nympho.
>Are you worried someone else is having a good time?
They might THINK they are having a good time, but in the end they will
pay.
>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> honored us in alt.atheism with
>the following discourse:
>> Mrs. Pudenda Fallopini <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Lina Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
>(snip for bevity)
>>>>Please do not post filth like this.
>>>Why, it makes you horny?
>>
>> Projecting again? You sound like a real nympho.
>Are you worried someone else is having a good time?
They might THINK they are having a good time, but in the end they will
pay.
Mar 27th 2004 | 4:38 am
#105
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The History of Vibrators and the Elusive Female Orgasm
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:05:14 +0000, Lina Morgan wrote:
> Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Icarus"
>><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... Lina Morgan wrote:
>> ...
>> ... >> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>> ... >> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>> ... >> with the problem.
>> ... >
>> ... > You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
>> ... > glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
>> ... > wrong with it.
>> ...
>> ... Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>>Missionary position, no lights whatsoever - only ! LOL
>
> You need more? You must be a slut.
When in church, I am sure she won't need more, right, Magda?
> Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:21:30 -0000, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Icarus"
>><[email protected]> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
>> ... Lina Morgan wrote:
>> ...
>> ... >> How silly. There's nothing indecent about sex, and nothing
>> ... >> indecent about being enthusiastic about it. You're the one
>> ... >> with the problem.
>> ... >
>> ... > You're right, when it is done the right way, for the
>> ... > glorification of God, the way he commands it, there is nothing
>> ... > wrong with it.
>> ...
>> ... Sex as a form of worship? That could catch on ;-)
>>Missionary position, no lights whatsoever - only ! LOL
>
> You need more? You must be a slut.
When in church, I am sure she won't need more, right, Magda?
