French censored answer to Google Earth.
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:43:59 -0700, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, Stanislas de
>Kertanguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Go Fig avait écrit le 26/07/2006 :
>> > In article <[email protected]>, Stanislas de
>> > Kertanguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mxsmanic a pens´ tr?s fort :
>> >>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Can you explain how the free press "have been" hindered by the military
>> >>>> _specifically in France_ ? In your opinion, when was the press actually
>> >>>> free and when did the military begin to interfere ?
>> >>>
>> >>> I thought my comments on France didn't vex you.
>> >>
>> >> I'm absolutely not vexed by this specific comment on France. I'd just
>> >> like to go further in the argument, and since I am interested in the
>> >> problems of the press, we may get somewhere.
>> >
>> > Do you think it appropriate that the government issues required 'press
>> > credentials' ?
>>
>> You mean "la carte de presse", right ?
>The one that that must be issued by CCIJP, the Commission of
>Professional Journalist.
Is this commission influenced politically at all?
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
>In article <[email protected]>, Stanislas de
>Kertanguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Go Fig avait écrit le 26/07/2006 :
>> > In article <[email protected]>, Stanislas de
>> > Kertanguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mxsmanic a pens´ tr?s fort :
>> >>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Can you explain how the free press "have been" hindered by the military
>> >>>> _specifically in France_ ? In your opinion, when was the press actually
>> >>>> free and when did the military begin to interfere ?
>> >>>
>> >>> I thought my comments on France didn't vex you.
>> >>
>> >> I'm absolutely not vexed by this specific comment on France. I'd just
>> >> like to go further in the argument, and since I am interested in the
>> >> problems of the press, we may get somewhere.
>> >
>> > Do you think it appropriate that the government issues required 'press
>> > credentials' ?
>>
>> You mean "la carte de presse", right ?
>The one that that must be issued by CCIJP, the Commission of
>Professional Journalist.
Is this commission influenced politically at all?
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Stanislas de
> Kertanguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Mxsmanic a pensé très fort :
> > > Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
> > >
> > >> Can you explain how the free press "have been" hindered by the military
> > >> _specifically in France_ ? In your opinion, when was the press actually
> > >> free and when did the military begin to interfere ?
> > >
> > > I thought my comments on France didn't vex you.
> >
> > I'm absolutely not vexed by this specific comment on France. I'd just
> > like to go further in the argument, and since I am interested in the
> > problems of the press, we may get somewhere.
>
> Do you think it appropriate that the government issues required 'press
> credentials' ?
Yes, it shocks me too. Obviously, they need to adopt the US style of
lame-arsed journalism. US journalists make the French ones seem like
highly intelligent, probing, pit-bull terriers. I listen to NPR quite a
bit, which you probably consider way too left. I had to turn it off- I'd
not realised just how whacko right-wing US 'journalism' often is. Of
course, for hard-core right wing I suppose you could turn to Fux- no
doubt your fave- but that's a cartoon. A bit like the UK Sun, or even
Times.
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
> In article <[email protected]>, Stanislas de
> Kertanguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Mxsmanic a pensé très fort :
> > > Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
> > >
> > >> Can you explain how the free press "have been" hindered by the military
> > >> _specifically in France_ ? In your opinion, when was the press actually
> > >> free and when did the military begin to interfere ?
> > >
> > > I thought my comments on France didn't vex you.
> >
> > I'm absolutely not vexed by this specific comment on France. I'd just
> > like to go further in the argument, and since I am interested in the
> > problems of the press, we may get somewhere.
>
> Do you think it appropriate that the government issues required 'press
> credentials' ?
Yes, it shocks me too. Obviously, they need to adopt the US style of
lame-arsed journalism. US journalists make the French ones seem like
highly intelligent, probing, pit-bull terriers. I listen to NPR quite a
bit, which you probably consider way too left. I had to turn it off- I'd
not realised just how whacko right-wing US 'journalism' often is. Of
course, for hard-core right wing I suppose you could turn to Fux- no
doubt your fave- but that's a cartoon. A bit like the UK Sun, or even
Times.
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
deansgate <[email protected]> wrote:
[]
> I listen to NPR quite a
> bit, which you probably consider way too left. I had to turn it off- I'd
> not realised just how whacko right-wing US 'journalism' often is.
I _lie_. I meant to say I'd forgotten, not 'not realised.'
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
deansgate <[email protected]> wrote:
[]
> I listen to NPR quite a
> bit, which you probably consider way too left. I had to turn it off- I'd
> not realised just how whacko right-wing US 'journalism' often is.
I _lie_. I meant to say I'd forgotten, not 'not realised.'
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:46:36 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Martin wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:30:09 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >Mxsmanic wrote:
>> >
>> >> Gregory Morrow writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Are the roofs of the White House and it's directly - adjoining
>> >> > buildings blanked - out...???
>> >>
>> >> Some of the roof area on the White House has been retouched on Google
>> >> Maps. It's not a very good job.
>> >>
>> >> I just tried Geoportail; the image quality is almost unusably poor,
>> >> and looks like a sick joke compared to Google Maps. And this is for
>> >> the center of Paris! The site is also designed more poorly and the
>> >> response time is worse. If they can't do it right, why don't they
>> >> just give up?
>> >
>> >
>> >Does this site also display the French penchant for Flash...???
>> Flesh Gordon gRunge?
>With his cohort "Jacqueline the Merciless"...
... wearing nothing but Delft Blue cling film and a silly smile?
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Martin wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:30:09 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >Mxsmanic wrote:
>> >
>> >> Gregory Morrow writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Are the roofs of the White House and it's directly - adjoining
>> >> > buildings blanked - out...???
>> >>
>> >> Some of the roof area on the White House has been retouched on Google
>> >> Maps. It's not a very good job.
>> >>
>> >> I just tried Geoportail; the image quality is almost unusably poor,
>> >> and looks like a sick joke compared to Google Maps. And this is for
>> >> the center of Paris! The site is also designed more poorly and the
>> >> response time is worse. If they can't do it right, why don't they
>> >> just give up?
>> >
>> >
>> >Does this site also display the French penchant for Flash...???
>> Flesh Gordon gRunge?
>With his cohort "Jacqueline the Merciless"...
... wearing nothing but Delft Blue cling film and a silly smile?
--
Martin
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:49:31 +0200, Stanislas de Kertanguy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
>deansgate a exprimé avec précision :
>> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>>>
>>>> You know, not every French lives in Paris.
>>>
>>> Every French what?
>> Piss off.
>By the way, is using the adjective as a noun _that_ incorrect ? (candid
>question!)
Yes but this time we forgive you.
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
>deansgate a exprimé avec précision :
>> Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
>>>
>>>> You know, not every French lives in Paris.
>>>
>>> Every French what?
>> Piss off.
>By the way, is using the adjective as a noun _that_ incorrect ? (candid
>question!)
Yes but this time we forgive you.
--
Martin
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:37:52 +0200, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:46:36 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>Martin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:30:09 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Mxsmanic wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Gregory Morrow writes:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Are the roofs of the White House and it's directly - adjoining
>>> >> > buildings blanked - out...???
>>> >>
>>> >> Some of the roof area on the White House has been retouched on Google
>>> >> Maps. It's not a very good job.
>>> >>
>>> >> I just tried Geoportail; the image quality is almost unusably poor,
>>> >> and looks like a sick joke compared to Google Maps. And this is for
>>> >> the center of Paris! The site is also designed more poorly and the
>>> >> response time is worse. If they can't do it right, why don't they
>>> >> just give up?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Does this site also display the French penchant for Flash...???
>>> Flesh Gordon gRunge?
>>With his cohort "Jacqueline the Merciless"...
>... wearing nothing but Delft Blue cling film and a silly smile?
Poor, poor old goat! You postings become more scummy every day!
>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:46:36 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>Martin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:30:09 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Mxsmanic wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Gregory Morrow writes:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Are the roofs of the White House and it's directly - adjoining
>>> >> > buildings blanked - out...???
>>> >>
>>> >> Some of the roof area on the White House has been retouched on Google
>>> >> Maps. It's not a very good job.
>>> >>
>>> >> I just tried Geoportail; the image quality is almost unusably poor,
>>> >> and looks like a sick joke compared to Google Maps. And this is for
>>> >> the center of Paris! The site is also designed more poorly and the
>>> >> response time is worse. If they can't do it right, why don't they
>>> >> just give up?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Does this site also display the French penchant for Flash...???
>>> Flesh Gordon gRunge?
>>With his cohort "Jacqueline the Merciless"...
>... wearing nothing but Delft Blue cling film and a silly smile?
Poor, poor old goat! You postings become more scummy every day!
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
deansgate writes:
> Can you think of a country where web design generally avoids Flash
> though?
The United States, Japan ... all the more developed countries.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
deansgate writes:
> Can you think of a country where web design generally avoids Flash
> though?
The United States, Japan ... all the more developed countries.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Stanislas de Kertanguy writes:
> 1/ Is submetre precision available on Google Earth (as this was the
> subject of your discussion) ?
I don't use Google Earth, but Google Maps goes down to one metre in
many locations.
> 2/ Have you lokked upon small French towns (or not so small ones) on
> Google Earth and Géoportail.
Yes. The resolution varies, depending on what they have on file.
> and one remark : I strongly doubt that ultra-high resolution Google
> pics are satellite ones.
Why?
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
> 1/ Is submetre precision available on Google Earth (as this was the
> subject of your discussion) ?
I don't use Google Earth, but Google Maps goes down to one metre in
many locations.
> 2/ Have you lokked upon small French towns (or not so small ones) on
> Google Earth and Géoportail.
Yes. The resolution varies, depending on what they have on file.
> and one remark : I strongly doubt that ultra-high resolution Google
> pics are satellite ones.
Why?
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
[email protected] writes:
> How do you define 'free' in this context?
Allowed to publish anything.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
> How do you define 'free' in this context?
Allowed to publish anything.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
[email protected] writes:
> Quite - but I'm waiting for him to expand on this. There's a middle
> ground between total press freedom and total state control of the media,
> and virtually all countries fall into this. But I don't think Mixi likes
> grey areas!
Gray areas often conceal slippery slopes.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
> Quite - but I'm waiting for him to expand on this. There's a middle
> ground between total press freedom and total state control of the media,
> and virtually all countries fall into this. But I don't think Mixi likes
> grey areas!
Gray areas often conceal slippery slopes.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Go Fig writes:
> Do you think it appropriate that the government issues required 'press
> credentials' ?
In France, this is used for censorship. The United States has no
government press credentials because it violates the Constitutional
guarantee of freedom of speech.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
> Do you think it appropriate that the government issues required 'press
> credentials' ?
In France, this is used for censorship. The United States has no
government press credentials because it violates the Constitutional
guarantee of freedom of speech.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:57:27 +0200, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Martin writes:
>> Not every user wants to change their settings of Norton Anti Virus or
>> McAfee to be able to see a photo.
>What is the site doing that interferes with antivirus software?
If you ran some you would know.
--
Martin
wrote:
>Martin writes:
>> Not every user wants to change their settings of Norton Anti Virus or
>> McAfee to be able to see a photo.
>What is the site doing that interferes with antivirus software?
If you ran some you would know.
--
Martin
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave Frightens Me writes:
> Is this commission influenced politically at all?
To get a press card, you need to earn at least half your income from
journalism, or you need to be sponsored by a press agency. To earn
half your income from journalism, you need a press card. Thus, the
only practical way to get a press card is to work for a press agency
of significant size. And the largest press agency in France is AFP,
which is very heavily subsidized by the government. Are you starting
to get the picture?
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
> Is this commission influenced politically at all?
To get a press card, you need to earn at least half your income from
journalism, or you need to be sponsored by a press agency. To earn
half your income from journalism, you need a press card. Thus, the
only practical way to get a press card is to work for a press agency
of significant size. And the largest press agency in France is AFP,
which is very heavily subsidized by the government. Are you starting
to get the picture?
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the royal duchy of city south and
deansgate writes:
> Yes, it shocks me too. Obviously, they need to adopt the US style of
> lame-arsed journalism. US journalists make the French ones seem like
> highly intelligent, probing, pit-bull terriers. I listen to NPR quite a
> bit, which you probably consider way too left. I had to turn it off- I'd
> not realised just how whacko right-wing US 'journalism' often is.
It's better to hear a wide variety of opinions than to have all but
approved opinions censored. Variety is a consequence of freedom of
speech. Do you oppose freedom of speech?
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
deansgate writes:
> Yes, it shocks me too. Obviously, they need to adopt the US style of
> lame-arsed journalism. US journalists make the French ones seem like
> highly intelligent, probing, pit-bull terriers. I listen to NPR quite a
> bit, which you probably consider way too left. I had to turn it off- I'd
> not realised just how whacko right-wing US 'journalism' often is.
It's better to hear a wide variety of opinions than to have all but
approved opinions censored. Variety is a consequence of freedom of
speech. Do you oppose freedom of speech?
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mxsmanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
>
> > How do you define 'free' in this context?
>
> Allowed to publish anything.
Which countries allow their media to publish anything?
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org
> [email protected] writes:
>
> > How do you define 'free' in this context?
>
> Allowed to publish anything.
Which countries allow their media to publish anything?
--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org



