Some stuffs in the movie lies.

http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf

Don't like bush, but I like balanced information.
http://genepoolsurvivalguide.com

On 1 Jan 2005 21:10:34 -0800, [email protected] wrote:

    >Some stuffs in the movie lies.
    >http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf

The title is:
"Fifty-nine DECEITS in Fahrenheit 911"

...not 59 lies. Are you trying to deceive people?

You can drive a truck through some of the holes in this document. Look
at this one:

"32. Despite Moore’s pose in the movie, he opposed the
Afghanistan War, and—in December 2002—claimed that
Osama bin Laden might be innocent."

Now, what did Moore ACTUALLY say?
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

Deep Frayed Morgues <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:

    >On 1 Jan 2005 21:10:34 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
    >>Some stuffs in the movie lies.
    >>http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf
    >The title is:
    >"Fifty-nine DECEITS in Fahrenheit 911"
    >...not 59 lies. Are you trying to deceive people?


hmm...


    >You can drive a truck through some of the holes in this document. Look
    >at this one:
    >"32. Despite Moore’s pose in the movie, he opposed the
    >Afghanistan War, and—in December 2002—claimed that
    >Osama bin Laden might be innocent."
    >Now, what did Moore ACTUALLY say?

Five seconds with Google turned up this piece by a guy named
Christopher Hitchens. Hitchens apparently doesn't have the greatest
reputation; between Hitchens and St. Michael, it's hard to guess which
is less credible.

Relevant excerpt from http://slate.msn.com/id/2102723/:

"In late 2002, almost a year after the al-Qaida assault on American
society, I had an onstage debate with Michael Moore at the Telluride
Film Festival. In the course of this exchange, he stated his view that
Osama Bin Laden should be considered innocent until proven guilty.
This was, he said, the American way. The intervention in Afghanistan,
he maintained, had been at least to that extent unjustified.
Something—I cannot guess what, since we knew as much then as we do
now—has since apparently persuaded Moore that Osama Bin Laden is as
guilty as hell."


--
"You can't learn anything except from eccentrics. It has
something to do with their getting your attention in the
first place." - Late UCLA art teacher, Mary Holmes

[email protected] wrote:

    > Some stuffs in the movie lies.

How? When much of it is (censored?) newsclips from the
vaults of major networks? You may question Moore's
interpretation of some of it, but things like protestors
"egging" Bush's limousine during the innaugural parade would
be a little hard to fake, don't you think? Also the fact
the parade was re-routed - and shortened - after it began
seems to support that film footage, does it not?

(Our "president" may have "had egg on his face"
figuratively, but one can't really blame hinm for not
wanting the phrase to have literal meaning, as well!)

Well, some truth. But look at the link
http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf