America Resorts to Economic Blackmail
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
"ArKLyte" schreef in bericht
news:[email protected]...
> On 7 Mar 2003 07:59:19 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> >ArKLyte wrote:
> >> On 6 Mar 2003 09:36:58 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> >> >The ****in' Idiot is NOT "America". According to the latest poll of
> >> >which I'm aware, twenty-five percent (25%) of San Franciscans support
> >> >his foreign policy.
> >>
> >> So, San Fran is the heartbeat of America?
> >
> >No, it unfortunately isn't. Too bad, don't you agree?
> Uhh. no. While it is the most beautiful city in the U.S.
> (I lived there for 7 years) it does not in any way
> represent the majority of American political opinion.
> Sorry.
That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
Sjoerd
news:[email protected]...
> On 7 Mar 2003 07:59:19 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> >ArKLyte wrote:
> >> On 6 Mar 2003 09:36:58 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> >> >The ****in' Idiot is NOT "America". According to the latest poll of
> >> >which I'm aware, twenty-five percent (25%) of San Franciscans support
> >> >his foreign policy.
> >>
> >> So, San Fran is the heartbeat of America?
> >
> >No, it unfortunately isn't. Too bad, don't you agree?
> Uhh. no. While it is the most beautiful city in the U.S.
> (I lived there for 7 years) it does not in any way
> represent the majority of American political opinion.
> Sorry.
That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
Sjoerd
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
ArKLyte wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:42:31 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>
> >> You don't know much about international politics and diplomacy,
> >> do you Viktor.
> >
> >I suspect it's Dumbya who doesn't know much about "international
> >politics and diplomacy"! (At least he's not exhibited much grasp of
> >either, so far.)
>
> So a *unanimous* U.N. resolution to disarm Saddam Hussein
> isn't a diplomatic victory?
When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
>
> LOL
>
> ================================================== ============
> "Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
> because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
> - Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
>
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:42:31 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>
> >> You don't know much about international politics and diplomacy,
> >> do you Viktor.
> >
> >I suspect it's Dumbya who doesn't know much about "international
> >politics and diplomacy"! (At least he's not exhibited much grasp of
> >either, so far.)
>
> So a *unanimous* U.N. resolution to disarm Saddam Hussein
> isn't a diplomatic victory?
When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
>
> LOL
>
> ================================================== ============
> "Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
> because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
> - Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:25:56 +0100, "Sjoerd" wrote:
>That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and morally.
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
>That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and morally.
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
ArKLyte wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:14:42 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>
> >I think the rest of the world is right to wonder "If his
> >method works in changing the Iraqi regime, who's next?"
>
> Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria/Lebanon regimes get changed through
> diplomacy or failing that with attack from our new/temporary
> bases in Iraq.
Are you REALLY the cretin you appear to be? Or was being "in the
military" the only time in your life you ever felt like a man, so you'd
like to repeat the experience? ...This time vicariously, of course - if
you were old enough for WW2, you're too old for this one. (Maybe THAT'S
your problem - senile dementia?)
>
> If Russia/China negotiations fail, then North Korea gets
> regime-changed by Trident missiles from our submarines
> as soon as the 37,000 unwanted U.S. troops are evacuated
> from South Korea. Alternatively, NK gets blown away by a
> re-armed, nuclear Japanese military with our help.
>
> Simple.
>
> ================================================== ============
> "Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
> because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
> - Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
>
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:14:42 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>
> >I think the rest of the world is right to wonder "If his
> >method works in changing the Iraqi regime, who's next?"
>
> Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria/Lebanon regimes get changed through
> diplomacy or failing that with attack from our new/temporary
> bases in Iraq.
Are you REALLY the cretin you appear to be? Or was being "in the
military" the only time in your life you ever felt like a man, so you'd
like to repeat the experience? ...This time vicariously, of course - if
you were old enough for WW2, you're too old for this one. (Maybe THAT'S
your problem - senile dementia?)
>
> If Russia/China negotiations fail, then North Korea gets
> regime-changed by Trident missiles from our submarines
> as soon as the 37,000 unwanted U.S. troops are evacuated
> from South Korea. Alternatively, NK gets blown away by a
> re-armed, nuclear Japanese military with our help.
>
> Simple.
>
> ================================================== ============
> "Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
> because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
> - Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 12:35:39 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>ArKLyte wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:42:31 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>>
>> >> You don't know much about international politics and diplomacy,
>> >> do you Viktor.
>> >
>> >I suspect it's Dumbya who doesn't know much about "international
>> >politics and diplomacy"! (At least he's not exhibited much grasp of
>> >either, so far.)
>>
>> So a *unanimous* U.N. resolution to disarm Saddam Hussein
>> isn't a diplomatic victory?
>When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
>talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
You don't know much, do you, ma'am.
U.N. Resolution 1441, which instructs Saddam to 'disarm
or face serious consequences' was passed in December 2002
U N A N I M O U S L Y.
I think it's time for you to turn on your TV or read a newspaper.
You haven't a single, solitary clue about what's going on.
You're busted, bitch.
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
>ArKLyte wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:42:31 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote:
>>
>> >> You don't know much about international politics and diplomacy,
>> >> do you Viktor.
>> >
>> >I suspect it's Dumbya who doesn't know much about "international
>> >politics and diplomacy"! (At least he's not exhibited much grasp of
>> >either, so far.)
>>
>> So a *unanimous* U.N. resolution to disarm Saddam Hussein
>> isn't a diplomatic victory?
>When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
>talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
You don't know much, do you, ma'am.
U.N. Resolution 1441, which instructs Saddam to 'disarm
or face serious consequences' was passed in December 2002
U N A N I M O U S L Y.
I think it's time for you to turn on your TV or read a newspaper.
You haven't a single, solitary clue about what's going on.
You're busted, bitch.
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:25:56 +0100, "Sjoerd"
wrote:
>That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
Gays would certainly have an easier life.
************* DAVE HATUNEN ([email protected]) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
wrote:
>That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
Gays would certainly have an easier life.
************* DAVE HATUNEN ([email protected]) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article , Hatunen
writes
>In any case, America is a quite secular nation despite some obvious
>pointing with alarm. Far more so than it was, say, when I was a
>student in the 1940s and the Lord's Prayer was part of our morning
>ritual.
Americans, however, seem to me, to be far more involved in religious
organisations than Europeans.
--
Marie Lewis
writes
>In any case, America is a quite secular nation despite some obvious
>pointing with alarm. Far more so than it was, say, when I was a
>student in the 1940s and the Lord's Prayer was part of our morning
>ritual.
Americans, however, seem to me, to be far more involved in religious
organisations than Europeans.
--
Marie Lewis
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
le Fri, 07 Mar 2003 21:09:36 GMT, dans l'article , ArKLyte a dit ...
{ snip }
>>When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
>>talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
> You don't know much, do you, ma'am.
>
> U.N. Resolution 1441, which instructs Saddam to 'disarm
> or face serious consequences' was passed in December 2002
> U N A N I M O U S L Y.
>
> I think it's time for you to turn on your TV or read a newspaper.
> You haven't a single, solitary clue about what's going on.
The resolution was _never_ designed to authorise military force, without a
second resolution.
{ snip infantile _ad hominem_ }
--
Desmond Coughlan
desmond @ zeouane.org
http: // www . zeouane . org
{ snip }
>>When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
>>talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
> You don't know much, do you, ma'am.
>
> U.N. Resolution 1441, which instructs Saddam to 'disarm
> or face serious consequences' was passed in December 2002
> U N A N I M O U S L Y.
>
> I think it's time for you to turn on your TV or read a newspaper.
> You haven't a single, solitary clue about what's going on.
The resolution was _never_ designed to authorise military force, without a
second resolution.
{ snip infantile _ad hominem_ }
--
Desmond Coughlan
desmond @ zeouane.org
http: // www . zeouane . org
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
le Fri, 07 Mar 2003 20:49:54 GMT, dans l'article , ArKLyte a dit ...
>>That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>>Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
> No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and morally.
What, you mean you're not already ?
--
Desmond Coughlan
desmond @ zeouane.org
http: // www . zeouane . org
>>That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>>Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
> No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and morally.
What, you mean you're not already ?
--
Desmond Coughlan
desmond @ zeouane.org
http: // www . zeouane . org
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:32:17 +0000, Desmond Coughlan wrote:
>le Fri, 07 Mar 2003 21:09:36 GMT, dans l'article , ArKLyte a dit ...
>{ snip }
>>>When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
>>>talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
>> You don't know much, do you, ma'am.
>>
>> U.N. Resolution 1441, which instructs Saddam to 'disarm
>> or face serious consequences' was passed in December 2002
>> U N A N I M O U S L Y.
>>
>> I think it's time for you to turn on your TV or read a newspaper.
>> You haven't a single, solitary clue about what's going on.
>The resolution was _never_ designed to authorise military force, without a
>second resolution.
Fine. So a second resolution it will be.
See how fair we are?
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
>le Fri, 07 Mar 2003 21:09:36 GMT, dans l'article , ArKLyte a dit ...
>{ snip }
>>>When did this take place? If it's the resolution others have been
>>>talking about, it happened long before the shrub took over from daddy.
>> You don't know much, do you, ma'am.
>>
>> U.N. Resolution 1441, which instructs Saddam to 'disarm
>> or face serious consequences' was passed in December 2002
>> U N A N I M O U S L Y.
>>
>> I think it's time for you to turn on your TV or read a newspaper.
>> You haven't a single, solitary clue about what's going on.
>The resolution was _never_ designed to authorise military force, without a
>second resolution.
Fine. So a second resolution it will be.
See how fair we are?
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Sjoerd" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "ArKLyte" schreef in bericht
> news:[email protected]...
> > On 7 Mar 2003 07:59:19 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> >
> > >ArKLyte wrote:
> > >> On 6 Mar 2003 09:36:58 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> > >> >The ****in' Idiot is NOT "America". According to the latest poll of
> > >> >which I'm aware, twenty-five percent (25%) of San Franciscans
support
> > >> >his foreign policy.
> > >>
> > >> So, San Fran is the heartbeat of America?
> > >
> > >No, it unfortunately isn't. Too bad, don't you agree?
> >
> > Uhh. no. While it is the most beautiful city in the U.S.
> > (I lived there for 7 years) it does not in any way
> > represent the majority of American political opinion.
> >
> > Sorry.
> That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
> Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
> Sjoerd
> You are so right!
Regards;
Alex
news:[email protected]...
> "ArKLyte" schreef in bericht
> news:[email protected]...
> > On 7 Mar 2003 07:59:19 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> >
> > >ArKLyte wrote:
> > >> On 6 Mar 2003 09:36:58 -0800, [email protected] (Icono Clast) wrote:
> > >> >The ****in' Idiot is NOT "America". According to the latest poll of
> > >> >which I'm aware, twenty-five percent (25%) of San Franciscans
support
> > >> >his foreign policy.
> > >>
> > >> So, San Fran is the heartbeat of America?
> > >
> > >No, it unfortunately isn't. Too bad, don't you agree?
> >
> > Uhh. no. While it is the most beautiful city in the U.S.
> > (I lived there for 7 years) it does not in any way
> > represent the majority of American political opinion.
> >
> > Sorry.
> That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
> Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
> Sjoerd
> You are so right!
Regards;
Alex
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
"ArKLyte" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:25:56 +0100, "Sjoerd"
wrote:
> >That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
> >Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
> No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and
morally.
> As opposed to mentally like yourself. I'll take SF any day.
Alex
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:25:56 +0100, "Sjoerd"
wrote:
> >That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
> >Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
> No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and
morally.
> As opposed to mentally like yourself. I'll take SF any day.
Alex
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 23:52:47 GMT, "Alex Starke" wrote:
>"ArKLyte" wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:25:56 +0100, "Sjoerd"
>wrote:
>> >That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>> >Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
>> No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and
>morally.
>> As opposed to mentally like yourself. I'll take SF any day.
And I'm pretty sure they'd 'take' you.
LOL!!
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
>"ArKLyte" wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:25:56 +0100, "Sjoerd"
>wrote:
>> >That's indeed sad. If the average American voted like the average San
>> >Franciscan, the USA and the world would be a much better place.
>> No. If we did, the U.S. would be totally bankrupted financially and
>morally.
>> As opposed to mentally like yourself. I'll take SF any day.
And I'm pretty sure they'd 'take' you.
LOL!!
================================================== ============
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
"ArKLyte" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:14:42 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote:
> >I think the rest of the world is right to wonder "If his
> >method works in changing the Iraqi regime, who's next?"
> Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria/Lebanon regimes get changed through
> diplomacy or failing that with attack from our new/temporary
> bases in Iraq.
> If Russia/China negotiations fail, then North Korea gets
> regime-changed by Trident missiles from our submarines
> as soon as the 37,000 unwanted U.S. troops are evacuated
> from South Korea. Alternatively, NK gets blown away by a
> re-armed, nuclear Japanese military with our help.
> Simple.
> Go crawl back under your rock. You are proving yourself to be one of the
biggest meatheads I've run across here. Do they let you out of the house
often. Or do you just live in that smelly basement full-time?
Oh, by the way the latest polls are out and your lover-boy GW is slipping
further and further DOWN.
Alex
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:14:42 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote:
> >I think the rest of the world is right to wonder "If his
> >method works in changing the Iraqi regime, who's next?"
> Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria/Lebanon regimes get changed through
> diplomacy or failing that with attack from our new/temporary
> bases in Iraq.
> If Russia/China negotiations fail, then North Korea gets
> regime-changed by Trident missiles from our submarines
> as soon as the 37,000 unwanted U.S. troops are evacuated
> from South Korea. Alternatively, NK gets blown away by a
> re-armed, nuclear Japanese military with our help.
> Simple.
> Go crawl back under your rock. You are proving yourself to be one of the
biggest meatheads I've run across here. Do they let you out of the house
often. Or do you just live in that smelly basement full-time?
Oh, by the way the latest polls are out and your lover-boy GW is slipping
further and further DOWN.
Alex
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> ArKLyte wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:14:42 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote:
> >
> > >I think the rest of the world is right to wonder "If his
> > >method works in changing the Iraqi regime, who's next?"
> >
> > Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria/Lebanon regimes get changed through
> > diplomacy or failing that with attack from our new/temporary
> > bases in Iraq.
> Are you REALLY the cretin you appear to be? Or was being "in the
> military" the only time in your life you ever felt like a man, so you'd
> like to repeat the experience? ...This time vicariously, of course - if
> you were old enough for WW2, you're too old for this one. (Maybe THAT'S
> your problem - senile dementia?)
> >
Can you believe the outright stupidity of this twit?
I hope they don't let him out of his straitjacket often.
Regards;
Alex
news:[email protected]...
> ArKLyte wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:14:42 -0800, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote:
> >
> > >I think the rest of the world is right to wonder "If his
> > >method works in changing the Iraqi regime, who's next?"
> >
> > Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria/Lebanon regimes get changed through
> > diplomacy or failing that with attack from our new/temporary
> > bases in Iraq.
> Are you REALLY the cretin you appear to be? Or was being "in the
> military" the only time in your life you ever felt like a man, so you'd
> like to repeat the experience? ...This time vicariously, of course - if
> you were old enough for WW2, you're too old for this one. (Maybe THAT'S
> your problem - senile dementia?)
> >
Can you believe the outright stupidity of this twit?
I hope they don't let him out of his straitjacket often.
Regards;
Alex



