Go Back  British Expats > Usenet Groups > rec.travel.* > rec.travel.europe
Reload this Page >

_:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

_:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 28th 2004, 1:53 pm
  #31  
Miguel Cruz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

The Reids <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Following up to Miguel Cruz
    >>> And of course, round trip is 70 blocks. You want to walk 35 blocks after
    >>> eating a meal?
    >> Absolutely! I walked home 20km after my Christmas eve dinner tonight. And it
    >> was 85F. Nothing better for alleviating the guilt of overeating.
    > nothing better than a good walk after a meal, especially in the
    > cold, How far is 35 blocks?

Not even 2 miles.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
 
Old Dec 29th 2004, 6:39 am
  #32  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

Following up to nitram

    >>I find it ridiculous anybody would think 1.5 mile walk
    >>ridiculous!
    >A 3 mile walk is a bit much if you only have 40 minutes for lunch.
    >--

If I have 40 minutes for lunch why eat 1.5 miles away? But that's
getting closer to the core of the issue. People rushing around to
do more and more to get more money to drive an SUV to lunch.
--
Mike Reid
UK Red Cross earthquake appeal is at
"http://www.redcross.org.uk"
 
Old Dec 29th 2004, 8:48 am
  #33  
Nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:39:40 +0000, The Reids
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >Following up to nitram
    >>>I find it ridiculous anybody would think 1.5 mile walk
    >>>ridiculous!
    >>A 3 mile walk is a bit much if you only have 40 minutes for lunch.
    >>--
    >If I have 40 minutes for lunch why eat 1.5 miles away?

Perhaps because that's the distance to the nearest place, where food
is available?

    > But that's
    >getting closer to the core of the issue. People rushing around to
    >do more and more to get more money to drive an SUV to lunch.

See above.
--
Martin
 
Old Dec 29th 2004, 10:19 am
  #34  
Icono Clast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

The Reids wrote:
    > I'll stick my neck out and say most of the worlds population now,
    > and all of the worlds population 50 years ago, regarded 4 miles
    > as a short walk. I used to walk farther to school every day in the
    > 50s.

Poor neck. A four-mile walk here has always been considered as
extremely long and close to unthinkable except to the very few. It's
more than half-way across town.

My walks to school were considered long, one farther than a mile, one
about a mile, and one about three-quarters of a mile.

Had you said "all of the world's population" in poor countries, or
rural areas in well-off countries, I would not disagree about today,
fifty years ago, or five thousand years ago.

    > The human body, to be healthy, requires that level of "fitness" in
    > all but the old

Wrong again. I know people in their eighties who walk more than five
miles a day because they want to; they enjoy it.

Because I dance, I don't take walks. They physical demands of dancing
are greater and doing so is infinitely more fun. (See today's Palm
Springs post.)
__________________________________________________ ______________
A San Franciscan who never says "No!" to an invitation to dance!
http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 8:13 am
  #35  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

Following up to Icono Clast

    >> I'll stick my neck out and say most of the worlds population now,
    >> and all of the worlds population 50 years ago, regarded 4 miles
    >> as a short walk. I used to walk farther to school every day in the
    >> 50s.
    >Poor neck. A four-mile walk here has always been considered as
    >extremely long and close to unthinkable except to the very few. It's
    >more than half-way across town.

Only by Americans.
Four miles unthinkable? Don't Americans ever go for a walk? If I
go out walking an easy day with a pub lunch will be 12-15 miles.
I'll walk more than 4 miles taking photos in central London, I
walk 4 miles return between the railway station and my dentist
and home. A 4 mile *run* isn't even long.

    >My walks to school were considered long, one farther than a mile, one
    >about a mile, and one about three-quarters of a mile.

Only by Americans

    >Had you said "all of the world's population" in poor countries, or
    >rural areas in well-off countries, I would not disagree about today,
    >fifty years ago, or five thousand years ago.

OK, the whole world except USA.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 10:26 am
  #36  
Icono Clast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

The Reids wrote:
    > Following up to Icono Clast
    >>>I'll stick my neck out and say most of the worlds population now,
    >>>and all of the worlds population 50 years ago, regarded 4 miles
    >>>as a short walk. I used to walk farther to school every day in the
    >>>50s.
    >>Poor neck. A four-mile walk here has always been considered as
    >>extremely long and close to unthinkable except to the very few. It's
    >>more than half-way across town.
    >
    >
    > Only by Americans.

The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
__________________________________________________ __________
A San Franciscan in (where else?) San Francisco
http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 11:48 am
  #37  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

Following up to Icono Clast

    >>>>I'll stick my neck out and say most of the worlds population now,
    >>>>and all of the worlds population 50 years ago, regarded 4 miles
    >>>>as a short walk. I used to walk farther to school every day in the
    >>>>50s.
    >>>Poor neck. A four-mile walk here has always been considered as
    >>>extremely long and close to unthinkable except to the very few. It's
    >>>more than half-way across town.

    >> Only by Americans.
    >The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.

Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
distances SFs think long are regarded as short.

San Franciscans are Americans.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 1:30 pm
  #38  
Nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:48:50 +0000, The Reids
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >Following up to Icono Clast
    >>>>>I'll stick my neck out and say most of the worlds population now,
    >>>>>and all of the worlds population 50 years ago, regarded 4 miles
    >>>>>as a short walk. I used to walk farther to school every day in the
    >>>>>50s.
    >>>>Poor neck. A four-mile walk here has always been considered as
    >>>>extremely long and close to unthinkable except to the very few. It's
    >>>>more than half-way across town.
    >
    >>> Only by Americans.
    >>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    >Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    >distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    >San Franciscans are Americans.

but not all Americans are San Franciscans.
--
Martin
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 1:58 pm
  #39  
The Reids
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

Following up to nitram

    >>>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    >>Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    >>distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    >>San Franciscans are Americans.
    >but not all Americans are San Franciscans.

Yep, let the others say how far they walk.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 2:38 pm
  #40  
Nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:58:58 +0000, The Reids
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >Following up to nitram
    >>>>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    >>>Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    >>>distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    >>>San Franciscans are Americans.
    >>but not all Americans are San Franciscans.
    >Yep, let the others say how far they walk.

Walking is easier in Florida than in SF. I am sure you can work out
why.
--
Martin
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 2:59 pm
  #41  
Miss L. Toe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

"nitram" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
    > On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:58:58 +0000, The Reids
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >Following up to nitram
    > >
    > >>>>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    > >>>
    > >>>Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    > >>>distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    > >>>
    > >>>San Franciscans are Americans.
    > >>
    > >>but not all Americans are San Franciscans.
    > >
    > >Yep, let the others say how far they walk.
    > Walking is easier in Florida than in SF. I am sure you can work out
    > why.

Hmm - cos its hot and sticky and you get chased by alligators ?
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 3:04 pm
  #42  
Nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:59:50 -0000, "Miss L. Toe"
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >"nitram" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected].. .
    >> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:58:58 +0000, The Reids
    >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >Following up to nitram
    >> >
    >> >>>>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    >> >>>
    >> >>>Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    >> >>>distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    >> >>>
    >> >>>San Franciscans are Americans.
    >> >>
    >> >>but not all Americans are San Franciscans.
    >> >
    >> >Yep, let the others say how far they walk.
    >> Walking is easier in Florida than in SF. I am sure you can work out
    >> why.
    >Hmm - cos its hot and sticky and you get chased by alligators ?

and because Florida is as flat as a pancake and SF isn't.

--
Martin
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 3:21 pm
  #43  
Miss L. Toe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

"nitram" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
    > On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:59:50 -0000, "Miss L. Toe"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >"nitram" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > >news:[email protected].. .
    > >> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:58:58 +0000, The Reids
    > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >Following up to nitram
    > >> >
    > >> >>>>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>>Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    > >> >>>distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>>San Franciscans are Americans.
    > >> >>
    > >> >>but not all Americans are San Franciscans.
    > >> >
    > >> >Yep, let the others say how far they walk.
    > >>
    > >> Walking is easier in Florida than in SF. I am sure you can work out
    > >> why.
    > >
    > >Hmm - cos its hot and sticky and you get chased by alligators ?
    > and because Florida is as flat as a pancake and SF isn't.

You havent seen *my* pancakes :-)
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 3:25 pm
  #44  
Nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:21:08 -0000, "Miss L. Toe"
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >"nitram" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected].. .
    >> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:59:50 -0000, "Miss L. Toe"
    >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >"nitram" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >> >news:[email protected].. .
    >> >> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:58:58 +0000, The Reids
    >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >Following up to nitram
    >> >> >
    >> >> >>>>The reference was to San Francisco, not the USA.
    >> >> >>>
    >> >> >>>Uh? The point I was making that in the rest of the world,
    >> >> >>>distances SFs think long are regarded as short.
    >> >> >>>
    >> >> >>>San Franciscans are Americans.
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >>but not all Americans are San Franciscans.
    >> >> >
    >> >> >Yep, let the others say how far they walk.
    >> >>
    >> >> Walking is easier in Florida than in SF. I am sure you can work out
    >> >> why.
    >> >
    >> >Hmm - cos its hot and sticky and you get chased by alligators ?
    >> and because Florida is as flat as a pancake and SF isn't.
    >You havent seen *my* pancakes :-)

LOL
Hot and sticky are they?

--
Martin
 
Old Dec 31st 2004, 8:35 pm
  #45  
Bob Fusillo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: _:Re: Mean streets in Europe?

When I was a boy I walked five miles to school in the snow, uphill each way.
Or so my son accuses me.
But if a Londoner says it's a ten minute walk, take a taxi.
rjf

"Icono Clast" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1104362809.c00747f14ff48508be0a2fe3e35abcda@t eranews...
    > The Reids wrote:
    > > I'll stick my neck out and say most of the worlds population now,
    > > and all of the worlds population 50 years ago, regarded 4 miles
    > > as a short walk. I used to walk farther to school every day in the
    > > 50s.
    > Poor neck. A four-mile walk here has always been considered as
    > extremely long and close to unthinkable except to the very few. It's
    > more than half-way across town.
    > My walks to school were considered long, one farther than a mile, one
    > about a mile, and one about three-quarters of a mile.
    > Had you said "all of the world's population" in poor countries, or
    > rural areas in well-off countries, I would not disagree about today,
    > fifty years ago, or five thousand years ago.
    > > The human body, to be healthy, requires that level of "fitness" in
    > > all but the old
    > Wrong again. I know people in their eighties who walk more than five
    > miles a day because they want to; they enjoy it.
    > Because I dance, I don't take walks. They physical demands of dancing
    > are greater and doing so is infinitely more fun. (See today's Palm
    > Springs post.)
    > __________________________________________________ ______________
    > A San Franciscan who never says "No!" to an invitation to dance!
    > http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
    > ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.