4 More years
Oct 27th 2004, 3:36 pm
#106
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years of hell
Gregory Morrow wrote:
> Frank F. Matthews wrote:
>
>>Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>snip
>>>Well *this* Yank knows for a *fact* that Georgia is one of the more
>
> ghastly
>>>places in the US, it's positively Turd World down there and I heartily
>> wish
>>>that Georgia along with the rest of the South plus Texas would secede
>> from
>>>the Union...or even better simply vanish altogether in a quick "poof!".
>>Of course, they did try it once. Out of curiosity why leave Texas out
>>of the term "South"? They did join the confederacy even if they did
>>have to dump Sam Houston from the Governor's office to manage it.
> Texas should be it's own country - they could manage it alright I think...
Traditionalist.
> Frank F. Matthews wrote:
>
>>Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>snip
>>>Well *this* Yank knows for a *fact* that Georgia is one of the more
>
> ghastly
>>>places in the US, it's positively Turd World down there and I heartily
>> wish
>>>that Georgia along with the rest of the South plus Texas would secede
>> from
>>>the Union...or even better simply vanish altogether in a quick "poof!".
>>Of course, they did try it once. Out of curiosity why leave Texas out
>>of the term "South"? They did join the confederacy even if they did
>>have to dump Sam Houston from the Governor's office to manage it.
> Texas should be it's own country - they could manage it alright I think...
Traditionalist.
Oct 27th 2004, 7:52 pm
#107
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
Not as good a win-win situation as if you should break your red neck and die
soon
Might give us some peace and quiet
Freda
--
Please reply to the list as my email address is a fake
"ARKADYA" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Hi,
> >
> >actually it was because the soviet union, our ally, put enough men on
> >the front lines to stop germany regardless of the cost.
> Theres a win win situation, dead Germans and dead Russians.
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
soon
Might give us some peace and quiet
Freda
--
Please reply to the list as my email address is a fake
"ARKADYA" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Hi,
> >
> >actually it was because the soviet union, our ally, put enough men on
> >the front lines to stop germany regardless of the cost.
> Theres a win win situation, dead Germans and dead Russians.
> Never Forgive, Never Forget
> 9-11-01
Oct 27th 2004, 8:42 pm
#108
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:22:01 +0930, Freda wrote:
>>>actually it was because the soviet union, our *ally*, put enough men on
>>>the front lines to stop germany regardless of the cost.
>> Theres a win win situation, dead Germans and dead Russians.
This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
--
Tim C.
>>>actually it was because the soviet union, our *ally*, put enough men on
>>>the front lines to stop germany regardless of the cost.
>> Theres a win win situation, dead Germans and dead Russians.
This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
--
Tim C.
Oct 27th 2004, 10:06 pm
#109
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Oct 27th 2004, 10:24 pm
#110
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On 28 Oct 2004 10:06:02 GMT, [email protected] (ARKADYA) wrote:
>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
So what sort of history do they have?
--
Martin
>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
So what sort of history do they have?
--
Martin
Oct 28th 2004, 1:53 am
#111
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On 28 Oct 2004 10:06:02 GMT, ARKADYA wrote:
>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
> Germans and Russians? Allies?
You said : " ... the soviet union, our ally,..."
--
Tim C.
>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
> Germans and Russians? Allies?
You said : " ... the soviet union, our ally,..."
--
Tim C.
Oct 28th 2004, 9:17 am
#112
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
>>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>So what sort of history do they have?
The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
strong leaders and losing wars.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>>Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>So what sort of history do they have?
The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
strong leaders and losing wars.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Oct 28th 2004, 9:26 am
#113
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On 28 Oct 2004 21:17:31 GMT, [email protected] (ARKADYA) wrote:
>>>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>>Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>>trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>>So what sort of history do they have?
>The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
>strong leaders and losing wars.
You have a lot in common with your allies.
--
Martin
>>>>This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>>Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>>trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>>So what sort of history do they have?
>The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
>strong leaders and losing wars.
You have a lot in common with your allies.
--
Martin
Oct 28th 2004, 10:41 am
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
ARKADYA <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>> Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>> trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>> So what sort of history do they have?
> The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
> strong leaders and losing wars.
You're making this too easy.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
>>>> This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>> Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>> trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>> So what sort of history do they have?
> The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
> strong leaders and losing wars.
You're making this too easy.
miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu
Oct 28th 2004, 11:08 am
#115
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:41:05 -0500, Miguel Cruz wrote:
> ARKADYA <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>>> Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>>> trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>>> So what sort of history do they have?
>> The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
>> strong leaders and losing wars.
>
> You're making this too easy.
Actually a strong case can be make to the effect that one major difference
between the US and the Soviet Union was in how successful their respective
governments were in their propaganda efforts.
No one in the Soviet Union seriously believed it.
In contrast, look at what people still believe on how the cold war
started. Or the Vietnam war. Built upon a very successfully package
bunch of lies.
> ARKADYA <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> This is typical of America's attitude to allies?
>>>> Germans and Russians? Allies? neither one of them has a history of being
>>>> trustworthy. incompetant expantionist rascist drunks.
>>> So what sort of history do they have?
>> The opposite. Both of these nations have a history of being brainwashed by
>> strong leaders and losing wars.
>
> You're making this too easy.
Actually a strong case can be make to the effect that one major difference
between the US and the Soviet Union was in how successful their respective
governments were in their propaganda efforts.
No one in the Soviet Union seriously believed it.
In contrast, look at what people still believe on how the cold war
started. Or the Vietnam war. Built upon a very successfully package
bunch of lies.
Oct 28th 2004, 11:42 am
#116
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
>In contrast, look at what people still believe on how the cold war
>started. Or the Vietnam war. Built upon a very successfully package
>bunch of lies.
The fact is that a World War against Islam is coming. It doesnt matter if the
battle is in Iraq or Arabia. Its all the same war, only Europeans are too
stupid to see the big picture
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>started. Or the Vietnam war. Built upon a very successfully package
>bunch of lies.
The fact is that a World War against Islam is coming. It doesnt matter if the
battle is in Iraq or Arabia. Its all the same war, only Europeans are too
stupid to see the big picture
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Oct 28th 2004, 12:00 pm
#117
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:42:59 +0000, ARKADYA wrote:
>>In contrast, look at what people still believe on how the cold war
>>started. Or the Vietnam war. Built upon a very successfully package
>>bunch of lies.
>
> The fact is that a World War against Islam is coming. It doesnt matter if the
> battle is in Iraq or Arabia. Its all the same war, only Europeans are too
> stupid to see the big picture
Another crusade, eh?
BTW, the US plus a couple of minions a world war does not make.
(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years. Which is
why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the last
time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
>>In contrast, look at what people still believe on how the cold war
>>started. Or the Vietnam war. Built upon a very successfully package
>>bunch of lies.
>
> The fact is that a World War against Islam is coming. It doesnt matter if the
> battle is in Iraq or Arabia. Its all the same war, only Europeans are too
> stupid to see the big picture
Another crusade, eh?
BTW, the US plus a couple of minions a world war does not make.
(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years. Which is
why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the last
time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
Oct 28th 2004, 2:01 pm
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
>(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years. Which is
>why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the last
>time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
You mean the war the liberals lost for us? maybe if we had used bigger bombs
after Tet in 68 we might have won. Pol Pot won HIS war, why? because he killed
all the liberals.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the last
>time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
You mean the war the liberals lost for us? maybe if we had used bigger bombs
after Tet in 68 we might have won. Pol Pot won HIS war, why? because he killed
all the liberals.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Oct 28th 2004, 4:22 pm
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:01:59 +0000, ARKADYA wrote:
>>(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years. Which is
>>why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the last
>>time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
>
> You mean the war the liberals lost for us? maybe if we had used bigger bombs
> after Tet in 68 we might have won. Pol Pot won HIS war, why? because he killed
> all the liberals.
Sounds like you like the company. You probably liked Hitler ever better,
presumably?
>>(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years. Which is
>>why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the last
>>time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
>
> You mean the war the liberals lost for us? maybe if we had used bigger bombs
> after Tet in 68 we might have won. Pol Pot won HIS war, why? because he killed
> all the liberals.
Sounds like you like the company. You probably liked Hitler ever better,
presumably?
Oct 28th 2004, 5:02 pm
#120
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 4 More years
"devil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]. ..
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:01:59 +0000, ARKADYA wrote:
> >>(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years.
Which is
> >>why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the
last
> >>time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
> >
> > You mean the war the liberals lost for us? maybe if we had used
bigger bombs
> > after Tet in 68 we might have won. Pol Pot won HIS war, why? because
he killed
> > all the liberals.
> Sounds like you like the company. You probably liked Hitler ever
better,
> presumably?
My guess is that he'd have been more comfortable under Antonio de
Oliveira Salazar.
news:[email protected]. ..
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:01:59 +0000, ARKADYA wrote:
> >>(Guess what, nobody has won a colonial war in the last 200 years.
Which is
> >>why I believe neither the US or Israel can win theirs. Remember the
last
> >>time the US got involved in one? Does Vietnam ring a bell?)
> >
> > You mean the war the liberals lost for us? maybe if we had used
bigger bombs
> > after Tet in 68 we might have won. Pol Pot won HIS war, why? because
he killed
> > all the liberals.
> Sounds like you like the company. You probably liked Hitler ever
better,
> presumably?
My guess is that he'd have been more comfortable under Antonio de
Oliveira Salazar.
