Wikiposts

CTT Mail Box

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 24th 2021 | 12:19 am
  #16  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 446
appman999 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: CTT Mail Box

With Google's help I read 14 as saying;

You don't need to have a fiscal rep OR an electronic mailbox if you 'joined the public service of electronic notifications associated with the unique digital address' as also mentioned in clause 2.

I guess the question is does this overrule clause 6 and/or apply to residents of the UK? Also what is 'the public service of electronic notifications associated with the unique digital address'

Also this advice from the tax office clearly says 'The designation of a fiscal representative is mandatory for citizens residing abroad, more precisely in a third country, outside the EU or the European Economic Area.'
 
Old Jan 24th 2021 | 12:27 am
  #17  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 446
appman999 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: CTT Mail Box

I think the fiscal rep requirement has always been there for residents of 'third countries' as the UK now is. The statement on 23/12/2020 is regarding the change for UK residents and is saying if you were already registered before 1/1/2021 you have 6 months to appoint a fiscal rep, if you register after that you must have a fiscal rep immediately?
 
Old Jan 24th 2021 | 12:32 am
  #18  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 418
TonyJ1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: CTT Mail Box

Originally Posted by fergus
Hi all, I have looked at the article that Tonyj mentions. https://info.portaldasfinancas.gov.p...ges/lgt19.aspx This seems to have been formalised from a draft that was done in 2018. There is no other associated dates that I can see. However, the requirement for a fiscal rep was made on 23rd December 2020. The final paragraph of this new requirement states that for those that register with AT after 1st January 2021 that the appointment of a fiscal rep is mandatory. I presume that as the latest and most recent law that it would take precedent over previous law? I appreciate that it is quite explicit with regards to new registration after 1st January 2021, but I do not see anything that states if you were registered before then, that you do not need a fiscal rep if you use a digital email service. Apart that is for the (contradictory) article on the AT site (link above). Is it possible the AT have simply not updated this in line with the new legislation made on 23rd December 2020? Here is a link to the December law which also happens to be on the AT web site.
https://info.portaldasfinancas.gov.p..._2020_XXII.pdf
Anyone care to comment??
I will comment - the law is not a draft - refer to the income tax act itself. Despacho's etc are not laws https://info.portaldasfinancas.gov.p...ges/lgt19.aspx. Despachos are internal instructions
However, taxpayers may have to 'push'. In other words, if a taxpayer has the ctt email box, and this is linked to the tax database, the tax authority cannot validly raise fines for non compliance. If they do so, it up to the taxpayer to raise the necessary defences - but I doubt they will raise any fines if the database is correctly linked in accordance with the tax act.- sometimes instructions are understandably out of date.
 
Old Jan 24th 2021 | 12:35 am
  #19  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 418
TonyJ1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: CTT Mail Box

Originally Posted by appman999
I think the fiscal rep requirement has always been there for residents of 'third countries' as the UK now is. The statement on 23/12/2020 is regarding the change for UK residents and is saying if you were already registered before 1/1/2021 you have 6 months to appoint a fiscal rep, if you register after that you must have a fiscal rep immediately?
There is 2 alternatives - either the ctt box, or a tax representative. In the case of corporations, a representative is required - many properties in PT are formerly owned by companies registered offshore, in this case the 19-14 does not apply.

The law was altered - current wording effective as from 2018
 
Old Jan 24th 2021 | 4:22 am
  #20  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 666
Bomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond reputeBomber Harris has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: CTT Mail Box

I would suggest people seek clarification from the Portuguese tax authority before blindly following one person's interpretation of Article 18 that having a CTT mailbox alleviates the need for a fiscal rep, rather than risking a fine which can be from €75 to €7500.

Decreto-Lei n.º 93/2017 will tell you exactly what a CTT mailbox replaces.
 
Old Jan 24th 2021 | 7:06 pm
  #21  
Red Eric's Avatar
Polished expat
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 18,687
From: Arcos de Valdevez "Onde Portugal se fez"
Red Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond reputeRed Eric has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: CTT Mail Box

Originally Posted by Bomber Harris
I would suggest people seek clarification from the Portuguese tax authority before blindly following one person's interpretation of Article 18 that having a CTT mailbox alleviates the need for a fiscal rep, rather than risking a fine which can be from €75 to €7500.

Decreto-Lei n.º 93/2017 will tell you exactly what a CTT mailbox replaces.
Is Article 12 of the latter not consistent with what has been said about dispensation of the obligation to appoint a fiscal representative?
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.