Why is it.....
#61
Re: Why is it.....
[QUOTE=
Hubby still talks about Rainbow Warrior too and how distressing he found that as an incident - and what life was like growing up in a small village on the West Coast looking after 10 chickens and a goat That way of life is still ingrained into him despite having lived here for 12 years - it's a certain attitude and outlook that he has as a New Zealander which is different and I don't know if I could ever quite understand it (but I am a city girl!).
He also bought me some Barry Crump which, try as I might, I just couldn't get into [/QUOTE]
Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J55MNq7Y4gs
Your Hubby sounds great! I still talk about Rainbow Warrior.
Had 9 hens but my father's relatives had most of North Yorks Dales+ the sheep farms.
I was a school holidays farmer- rest of the time a big city girl!
If I were younger by 30 years- but i'm not!
Hubby still talks about Rainbow Warrior too and how distressing he found that as an incident - and what life was like growing up in a small village on the West Coast looking after 10 chickens and a goat That way of life is still ingrained into him despite having lived here for 12 years - it's a certain attitude and outlook that he has as a New Zealander which is different and I don't know if I could ever quite understand it (but I am a city girl!).
He also bought me some Barry Crump which, try as I might, I just couldn't get into [/QUOTE]
Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J55MNq7Y4gs
Your Hubby sounds great! I still talk about Rainbow Warrior.
Had 9 hens but my father's relatives had most of North Yorks Dales+ the sheep farms.
I was a school holidays farmer- rest of the time a big city girl!
If I were younger by 30 years- but i'm not!
#62
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 6,695
Re: Why is it.....
To be honest I would probably have to write a book about this and I'm sure others have already done so. I'm really talking about learning the history, customs and cultures of the people, both Maori and Pakeha. As children this is taught in schools in a number of ways, and it permeates the world around you so that you almost don't notice. Learn about how the Maori settled in the country, the tribal warfare, European settlement, the land wars, the country's experience during the two world wars, the 1981 Springbok tour that many say forced NZ to grow up, the anti nuclear policy and the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior. These are just some that spring to mind right now and it does no justice to the experience many kiwis have had growing up in NZ. I was talking to my dad about when he was growing up on a farm. His dad lost out on the sale of a farm and had to support a family of 5 on a truck drivers wage until he could save up to buy a new one. Life was tough for many people, so it could be argued that the country has come along way, even if some think it has a way to go (assuming that would be progress).
That's all - I'm not here to argue. If you don't like where you are living then do something about it. Either change your expectation or change your location.
One thing I would mention that I think is sometimes not noticed by Brits. Kiwis are not likely to be critical to your face so when you think they have no opinion on a subject they probably do, but they just don't tell you about it.
That's all - I'm not here to argue. If you don't like where you are living then do something about it. Either change your expectation or change your location.
One thing I would mention that I think is sometimes not noticed by Brits. Kiwis are not likely to be critical to your face so when you think they have no opinion on a subject they probably do, but they just don't tell you about it.
If there is a book, I'd love to read it.
I agree. I don't know whether it's because of the small country/isolated thing and needing to get on, but kiwis don't tend to seek out that kind of confrontation because, in such a small country where people are very interconnected and interrelated, that kind of thing can have repercussions. WE tend to look for ways to get on, not ways to argue. We save those discussions for people we know really well.
THe wars are important because of the sense of abandonment many Pakeha felt by the British empire and also the belief that our men were treated as cannon fodder by the British (according to my oldies). All our men were fighting overseas for the UK and we were essentially undefended, and our troops were not allowed to come home. I remember my nana telling me all they had were fake wooden guns in case of japanese invasion of wellington and bunch of elderly,lame and crippled men. The joke was, they'd go up on the hills and shoot the Japanese full of bora (termites). "Never forget, girl, teh English didn't care about us." I think this was a big period of disillusionment in the Empire - the Empire showed that it was more than capable of throwing it's farthest outposts under the bus if necessary, which was not what most of the nzers had been brought up to believe- Britannia was supposed to rule the waves and protect them, and she didn't.
Nana loved the AMericans, she believed they saved us from Japanese invasion and she would never let me forget it. She had no time for the British whatsoever after WW2. It's a generational thing though - I don't know exactly when the Anti-americanism started in NZ, but the no-nukes thing definitely kicked it up another level, because the US was not happy with us.
Just as an aside, I was quite taken aback to visit the UK and find people assumed we colonials never suffered during the wars and we were all lying around eating pineapples or something.
I remember the Bok tour well because my parents supported it - they really believed politics should stay out of sport - and I was the only kid in the class whose parents did, so I kept very quiet. IT was very divisive at the time.
Kiwi toughness is something I miss. I don't miss the parochial attitudes though.
I am very proud of the no-nukes policy A really gutsy thing to do at the time. I studied it in political science - what some don't realise is that if an accident had happened, we in NZ would have been left with the clean up costs by ourselves which would have been an enormous burden for such a small country and economy.
Last edited by ExKiwilass; Jul 17th 2010 at 7:30 pm.
#63
Re: Why is it.....
Found all of your post quite interesting, so please forgive me for selecting only two bits to comment on.
Interesting that the UK/American forces even in those days had 'spheres of influence'. It's quite likely they agreed between themselves that NZ would be primarily defended by the US. The UK had quite a lot of trouble defending places as small as Jersey which was much more local!!!
Don't be too surprised. Public surveys often highlight astonishing ignorance in the population at large, even over contemporary affairs. Many people find it impossible to even name their own Prime Minister...
Don't be too surprised. Public surveys often highlight astonishing ignorance in the population at large, even over contemporary affairs. Many people find it impossible to even name their own Prime Minister...
#64
Re: Why is it.....
Now give me a couple of years to find it and get settled first and then I'll let you know
In the shorter term, maybe someone else on the forum already lives there and can tell us both
#65
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 6,695
Re: Why is it.....
The "no farmers in a fifty mile radius" had me stumped
#66
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: In a large village called Auckland
Posts: 5,249
#67
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: bottom of the world
Posts: 4,533
Re: Why is it.....
#68
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: bottom of the world
Posts: 4,533
Re: Why is it.....
Fighting in italy and liberating france, belgium and driving the germans back to berlin
from all across europe.
On top of that they also defended the atlantic sea lanes and many mediteranian ports.
The americans were fighting the war in the pacific, they needed strategic
bases around the rim.
Australia, new zealand and hawaii were their main ports of call.
New zealand was never under any threat during the war apart from its
position as a staging post for us troops it was no threat and its position was
of no importance to the japanese unless they decided to invade australia
which was never part of its plans.
Kiwi soilders played a great role during the war but those left behind over
exagerated their coutrys importance and the threat to it.
Rainbow warrior was a tragerdy but again the threat and significance was and still is
over played. The uk was blown up and bombed regularly but people just got
on with it. No one digs it up or talks about it, its done with and we moved on.
#69
Re: Why is it.....
Also defending itself, freeing north africa, greece, the low countries, malta,
Fighting in italy and liberating france, belgium and driving the germans back to berlin
from all across europe.
On top of that they also defended the atlantic sea lanes and many mediteranian ports.
The americans were fighting the war in the pacific, they needed strategic
bases around the rim.
Australia, new zealand and hawaii were their main ports of call.
New zealand was never under any threat during the war apart from its
position as a staging post for us troops it was no threat and its position was
of no importance to the japanese unless they decided to invade australia
which was never part of its plans.
Kiwi soilders played a great role during the war but those left behind over
exagerated their coutrys importance and the threat to it.
Rainbow warrior was a tragerdy but again the threat and significance was and still is
over played. The uk was blown up and bombed regularly but people just got
on with it. No one digs it up or talks about it, its done with and we moved on.
Fighting in italy and liberating france, belgium and driving the germans back to berlin
from all across europe.
On top of that they also defended the atlantic sea lanes and many mediteranian ports.
The americans were fighting the war in the pacific, they needed strategic
bases around the rim.
Australia, new zealand and hawaii were their main ports of call.
New zealand was never under any threat during the war apart from its
position as a staging post for us troops it was no threat and its position was
of no importance to the japanese unless they decided to invade australia
which was never part of its plans.
Kiwi soilders played a great role during the war but those left behind over
exagerated their coutrys importance and the threat to it.
Rainbow warrior was a tragerdy but again the threat and significance was and still is
over played. The uk was blown up and bombed regularly but people just got
on with it. No one digs it up or talks about it, its done with and we moved on.
#70
Re: Why is it.....
Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J55MNq7Y4gs
Your Hubby sounds great! I still talk about Rainbow Warrior.
Had 9 hens but my father's relatives had most of North Yorks Dales+ the sheep farms.
I was a school holidays farmer- rest of the time a big city girl!
If I were younger by 30 years- but i'm not!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J55MNq7Y4gs
Your Hubby sounds great! I still talk about Rainbow Warrior.
Had 9 hens but my father's relatives had most of North Yorks Dales+ the sheep farms.
I was a school holidays farmer- rest of the time a big city girl!
If I were younger by 30 years- but i'm not!
#71
Re: Why is it.....
As I understand it from the New Zealanders I spoke to it had little to do with threat and more to do with the French shafting NZ royally. Show me an English person who hasn't ranted about the French at one point or another in their lifetime.......even if it is just over a rugby game......
#72
Re: Why is it.....
Oh and just on the French....a rather entertaining column in the Scotsman on the latest French brainwave - I'm not saying I agree or disagree, just found it, and the comments, rather amusing http://news.scotsman.com/news/Gerald...ils.6425988.jp (apologies for the off topic post but it kind of relates to my last one I am not sure what French/NZ relations are like these days? )
Last edited by londonescapee; Jul 18th 2010 at 9:50 pm.
#73
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: bottom of the world
Posts: 4,533
Re: Why is it.....
The law to ban the burqa ban is an attempt to halt the spread of islam across
europe. The threat from islam is not a terrorist threat as many particulaly in
the media will try to link this move to a wish to rid musllms from european communities.
The fear among eurpean countries is a loss of national identity.
Many muslims settle into communities that do not intergrate and those
communities are growing fast.They do not accept their host nations traditions
and ideals and many see that as a threat.
Personally i dont mind scarfs but i like to see people i talk to and find the
burqa very intrusive. There is also now the growing incidence of the burqa
being worn as a sign of defiance, to cause intimidation. Admitedly this is
probably done by a very small minority but it is very difficultt to differentiate
between the true believer and the annoying idiot when you cant see them.
Having lived around muslims for many years i've never really hada problem with
them on a pesonal level. those i have known as freinds or work mates have
been from the group that intergrates yet retaines their belief and faith.
The other group who we see mainly in the media, the fundamentalists and non conformists
are the ones who create the drastic situations we have now seen in france with
the banning of the burqa and also in switzerland where ilsamic style mosqes
with minerrets have been banned.
It is a little strange when in places like the uk where only around 2% of the population
attend a christian church on a sunday so many complain about muslims bringing their religion to the country.
On a lighter note
I heard a few weeks ago on a phone in show on Newstalk ZB in the waikato
a kiwi guy explaining why he no longer bought chocolate if it had arabic writing
on the wrapper because he said that meant that some of the money from the
cost of the chocolate was being sent to afganistan to support terrorists
I laughed so hard i almost crashed the car
europe. The threat from islam is not a terrorist threat as many particulaly in
the media will try to link this move to a wish to rid musllms from european communities.
The fear among eurpean countries is a loss of national identity.
Many muslims settle into communities that do not intergrate and those
communities are growing fast.They do not accept their host nations traditions
and ideals and many see that as a threat.
Personally i dont mind scarfs but i like to see people i talk to and find the
burqa very intrusive. There is also now the growing incidence of the burqa
being worn as a sign of defiance, to cause intimidation. Admitedly this is
probably done by a very small minority but it is very difficultt to differentiate
between the true believer and the annoying idiot when you cant see them.
Having lived around muslims for many years i've never really hada problem with
them on a pesonal level. those i have known as freinds or work mates have
been from the group that intergrates yet retaines their belief and faith.
The other group who we see mainly in the media, the fundamentalists and non conformists
are the ones who create the drastic situations we have now seen in france with
the banning of the burqa and also in switzerland where ilsamic style mosqes
with minerrets have been banned.
It is a little strange when in places like the uk where only around 2% of the population
attend a christian church on a sunday so many complain about muslims bringing their religion to the country.
On a lighter note
I heard a few weeks ago on a phone in show on Newstalk ZB in the waikato
a kiwi guy explaining why he no longer bought chocolate if it had arabic writing
on the wrapper because he said that meant that some of the money from the
cost of the chocolate was being sent to afganistan to support terrorists
I laughed so hard i almost crashed the car
#74
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 6,695
Re: Why is it.....
Also defending itself, freeing north africa, greece, the low countries, malta,
Fighting in italy and liberating france, belgium and driving the germans back to berlin
from all across europe.
On top of that they also defended the atlantic sea lanes and many mediteranian ports.
The americans were fighting the war in the pacific, they needed strategic
bases around the rim.
Australia, new zealand and hawaii were their main ports of call.
New zealand was never under any threat during the war apart from its
position as a staging post for us troops it was no threat and its position was
of no importance to the japanese unless they decided to invade australia
which was never part of its plans.
Kiwi soilders played a great role during the war but those left behind over
exagerated their coutrys importance and the threat to it.
Rainbow warrior was a tragerdy but again the threat and significance was and still is
over played. The uk was blown up and bombed regularly but people just got
on with it. No one digs it up or talks about it, its done with and we moved on.
Fighting in italy and liberating france, belgium and driving the germans back to berlin
from all across europe.
On top of that they also defended the atlantic sea lanes and many mediteranian ports.
The americans were fighting the war in the pacific, they needed strategic
bases around the rim.
Australia, new zealand and hawaii were their main ports of call.
New zealand was never under any threat during the war apart from its
position as a staging post for us troops it was no threat and its position was
of no importance to the japanese unless they decided to invade australia
which was never part of its plans.
Kiwi soilders played a great role during the war but those left behind over
exagerated their coutrys importance and the threat to it.
Rainbow warrior was a tragerdy but again the threat and significance was and still is
over played. The uk was blown up and bombed regularly but people just got
on with it. No one digs it up or talks about it, its done with and we moved on.
I don't think it has anything to do with importance of NZ -it has everything to do with being undefended while the Japanese expanded in the Pacific. At the time, the people left here had no idea what the Japanese plans were. If the US hadn't come in, do you really think the Japanese, who were hungry for land and resources, would have left Aus and NZ alone? ooookay then.
I seem to remember there was a commemoration ceremony recently for the london bombings...I guess people aren't 'done with it' yet. They obviously forgot their stiff upper lips somewhere?
#75
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 6,695
Re: Why is it.....
As I understand it from the New Zealanders I spoke to it had little to do with threat and more to do with the French shafting NZ royally. Show me an English person who hasn't ranted about the French at one point or another in their lifetime.......even if it is just over a rugby game......
Unlike the bombings in the UK, which were over Northern Ireland, which the British invaded.