![]() |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 10075480)
But what do you have to offer in return?
anyway it's all good - clearly i'm not gonna get a muslim version of Hugh Jackman out here :p |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by Bahtatboy
(Post 10075441)
Therefore you must be fugly :thumbsup:
|
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by mission
(Post 10075399)
you guys have NO idea what we females have to put up with out here :rofl: trust me, there maybe quantity but it certainly lacks in quality. and yes of course we could easily get laid if we had no standards -the few and far between, who are vaguely decent are usually taken.....and unlike the fugly dudes who have to go to a pro to fulfill his sexual urges - for women, and i guess i can only speak for myself, i'd think about paying for a hot/fit/cute guy to keep me entertained of an evening and who could actually string a sentence in coherent English :p As they say you pay for what you get :D
As with there is not a 'type' of woman that is a 'pro' there is no 'type' of man that visits a 'pro' I guess if you are not in the profession then you would not know what kind of guy does this.... 80% of my clients are married, there are many reasons for paying escorts a visit, I know many reasons but do not think this is the place to share. The single guys that come and see me give me many reasons but I have to say the No1 reason is that women are too needy, second reason is lack of time as they are usually very busy with work and of course maybe the quality of single women is not all that and they just do not find someone they are attracted to. Guys from all walks of life do this and how much a woman charges will determine the caliber of client she will see. This is not to offend anybody but it's the facts!! |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
There is something I am trying to think of regarding seeing a gigolo, applies to women also but essentially it boils down to would you go out with someone who will sleep with others for money.
No matter how cute/fit/intelligent etc the person is surely this is always the stumbling block, but if it only boils down to wanting a casual shag then I can't see that its that hard to find a reasonable guy. aimed at mission above ^^ |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by British Nat
(Post 10075495)
As with there is not a 'type' of woman that is a 'pro' there is no 'type' of man that visits a 'pro'
I guess if you are not in the profession then you would not know what kind of guy does this.... 80% of my clients are married, there are many reasons for paying escorts a visit, I know many reasons but do not think this is the place to share. The single guys that come and see me give me many reasons but I have to say the No1 reason is that women are too needy, second reason is lack of time as they are usually very busy with work and of course maybe the quality of single women is not all that and they just do not find someone they are attracted to. Guys from all walks of life do this and how much a woman charges will determine the caliber of client she will see. This is not to offend anybody but it's the facts!! |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by weasel decentral
(Post 10075496)
There is something I am trying to think of regarding seeing a gigolo, applies to women also but essentially it boils down to would you go out with someone who will sleep with others for money.
No matter how cute/fit/intelligent etc the person is surely this is always the stumbling block, but if it only boils down to wanting a casual shag then I can't see that its that hard to find a reasonable guy. aimed at mission above ^^ The dilemma I will have is when I meet someone do I tell him my old job straight away or wait until he gets to know me? I do not like secrets and would like to think I would tell him straight away but then if he has not gotten to know me he may judge. If I wait for him to get to know me then tell him, will he think that everything I have told him is a lie! I guess I will know when the time comes. |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by shiva
(Post 10075512)
there may not be a type but is there any nationality that favours the services of a pro more than any others
Not that I am aware of |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by mission
(Post 10075393)
:rofl:
isn't Millhouse taken??? :sneaky: |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by British Nat
(Post 10075517)
also for me personally in my real life casual sex is a no no so maybe setting the foundations for a relationship with no sex first will reassure that an ex 'pro' is not a sex maniac and will bang an guy she meets.
It would take quite a secure guy to take that on, regardless of the associated moral judgements he may have. Also I would never tell at the start, its normal human behaviour to slowly reveal ourselves to each other, so while this is a large secret it would really only become properly relevant if something physical was going to develop in the relationship. |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by British Nat
(Post 10075495)
As with there is not a 'type' of woman that is a 'pro' there is no 'type' of man that visits a 'pro'
I guess if you are not in the profession then you would not know what kind of guy does this.... 80% of my clients are married, there are many reasons for paying escorts a visit, I know many reasons but do not think this is the place to share. The single guys that come and see me give me many reasons but I have to say the No1 reason is that women are too needy, second reason is lack of time as they are usually very busy with work and of course maybe the quality of single women is not all that and they just do not find someone they are attracted to. Guys from all walks of life do this and how much a woman charges will determine the caliber of client she will see. This is not to offend anybody but it's the facts!! There used to be footballers in there, Rugby stars and people from TV, so I can honestly say there is not a particular guy that is more or less likely to engage the services of a working girl. Look at Hugh Bonneville for starters with a dilly dolly up his ass. |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by weasel decentral
(Post 10075552)
I don't think its the sex maniac part of it really, for me it would be all about my own insecurities. A woman with more sexual experience and all that entails, and also the chance of meeting former clients etc..
It would take quite a secure guy to take that on, regardless of the associated moral judgements he may have. Also I would never tell at the start, its normal human behaviour to slowly reveal ourselves to each other, so while this is a large secret it would really only become properly relevant if something physical was going to develop in the relationship. The not telling bit.....I will have a 2 year gap in my work CV, if I do not tell then I would have to lie and say I was doing another job.... |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by britexpat76
(Post 10075579)
As I am anonymous on here I will share this one, Back in the Late 90's and my Mid 20's I lived in Leeds, was earning 80k + a year with a nice pretty girlfriend, house car etc. What my family/GF work colleagues didn't know was that every friday night myself and 3 friends on a par with me would be out in Town stuffing more stuff up our nostrils that a 2 year old and after town we would go to a place called Winstons. Winstons was a bona fide high class whore house which served beer all night, had a sauna, Jacuzzi and some of the fittest women in Leeds, Most of which were students or Career women who wanted extra cash. So despite having pretty much everything and as I was then a cute looking guy we spent every friday and some saturdays in the company of quite a few working girls.
There used to be footballers in there, Rugby stars and people from TV, so I can honestly say there is not a particular guy that is more or less likely to engage the services of a working girl. Look at Hugh Bonneville for starters with a dilly dolly up his ass. |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
hmm I like to think Im pretty open minded, however I'm not sure I could get my head around a guy having slept with working girls, or a guy that had worked as a gigolo. I guess it would just leave me too insecure. I always think best not ask a question you might not like the answer to- sometimes ignorance is bliss!
However if a guy I was dating slept with anyone whilst we were a couple without a question (working girl or not) he would be out on his arse quicker than he could say it was only a handjob. I would possibly break his legs on the way out as well. |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Originally Posted by kittycat1
(Post 10075620)
hmm I like to think Im pretty open minded, however I'm not sure I could get my head around a guy having slept with working girls, or a guy that had worked as a gigolo. I guess it would just leave me too insecure. I always think best not ask a question you might not like the answer to- sometimes ignorance is bliss!
However if a guy I was dating slept with anyone whilst we were a couple without a question (working girl or not) he would be out on his arse quicker than he could say it was only a handjob. I would possibly break his legs on the way out as well. |
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
funnily enough I could probably live with that however I would never want to see it or know any details. I might ask him to destroy any copies he had as well.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:46 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.