![]() |
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8640069)
Apparently developed at Loughborough University for Adidas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adidas_...i#cite_note-28 I like the contrast between the comments from the Adidas sponsored players and the rest. Goal count is well down on average for the 1st matches anyway. What's your point? |
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by Greenhill
(Post 8639658)
If anyone was wondering, not that I was, here is the table with PTS/Predictions as a percentage.
Code:
Name PTS # Predictions PTS/PredictionsThere are lies, there are damned lies and then there are football prediction statistics! |
Re: World Cup
JamesM Germany 2 Serbia 0
JamesM Slovenia 1 USA 1 JamesM England 3 Algeria 0 |
Re: World Cup
tomorrows games USA to lose 2-1 England to win 3-1
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8639625)
Sol Campbell has slammed England coach Fabio Capello for overlooking him for the World Cup finals.
I seem to remember he wouldn't come out for the second half a few years ago when Arsenal were getting beaten 3-0. http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/170620...s-capello.html Stick Sol Campbell, Stick Sol Campbell up your arse" as they sing, jollily, at Tottenham games. |
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by JamesM
(Post 8640138)
JamesM Germany 2 Serbia 0
JamesM Slovenia 1 USA 1 JamesM England 3 Algeria 0 |
Re: World Cup
looks like the refs are anti-American. Would have been nice to seem them come back from 2 goals down to win, but no.
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8639620)
Sh*t? :huh:
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8641278)
looks like the refs are anti-American. Would have been nice to seem them come back from 2 goals down to win, but no.
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8641078)
You got the first one a bit wrong, didn't you:p
I fear England will meet Germany in round 2. |
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8641429)
Half the US team had their hands wrapped around the Slovenian players. It was a clear foul. The US was lucky to get a draw. The US has always delusions of grandeur in footballing terms, must be that they come from such a weak confederation.
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8641308)
That wouldn't be suprising the way they play it. The point is they decided to follow the international norm unlike the remaining 3 countries.
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8641476)
Yes, I am sure that the Aussie citizens will start calling it football with the name of their national team being the socceroos. :rolleyes:
|
Re: World Cup
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8641552)
It's fine for insular places to use parochial names like the "S" word.
|
Re: World Cup
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:56 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.