Will you vote in the UK election?
#31
Forum Regular



Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 237
From: Blind Bay, BC











Hi Almost Canadian...... of course I will.....it is my right!!
Best wishes, Steve
Best wishes, Steve
#32
Pointless unless you intend to return, at the end of the day does it really matter who's in power?
#33
Looks like the announcement is iminent.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8603591.stm
I did register as on overseas voter fwiw. I noticed on the forms that commonwealth and EU citizens who are UK residents can vote in UK general elections. In Canada it seems only Canadian citizens can vote. Why is voting eligibility so restrictive in Canada?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8603591.stm
I did register as on overseas voter fwiw. I noticed on the forms that commonwealth and EU citizens who are UK residents can vote in UK general elections. In Canada it seems only Canadian citizens can vote. Why is voting eligibility so restrictive in Canada?
#34
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,284

I would like to vote and downloaded the forms. As far as I can make out the ballot papers are sent out a week or so before the election so it is unlikely that the mail will get them back in time. You can go for a proxy vote but that can only be made in the electoral district in which you were last registered and as we don't know anyone there that isn't an option.
So, no vote for us.
So, no vote for us.
#35
What Canada does is normal for sovereign, independent nations.
#37
I would like to vote and downloaded the forms. As far as I can make out the ballot papers are sent out a week or so before the election so it is unlikely that the mail will get them back in time. You can go for a proxy vote but that can only be made in the electoral district in which you were last registered and as we don't know anyone there that isn't an option.
So, no vote for us.
So, no vote for us.
#39
I noticed the National tonight had a short feature on the UK election. It mentioned that some academics had produced a report on the experiences of minority goverments worldwide which cited the canadian federal parliament as the prime example of a dysfunctional aggressive parliament. Is the canadian minority government situation one to be avoided at all costs?
#40
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,553











I noticed the National tonight had a short feature on the UK election. It mentioned that some academics had produced a report on the experiences of minority goverments worldwide which cited the canadian federal parliament as the prime example of a dysfunctional aggressive parliament. Is the canadian minority government situation one to be avoided at all costs?
By the way - I'm surprised nobody in the media - especially the Tory-supporting element - have pointed out that, due to uneven population distribution, it takes on average fewer votes to elect a Labour MP than a Tory MP.............
#41
By the way - I'm surprised nobody in the media - especially the Tory-supporting element - have pointed out that, due to uneven population distribution, it takes on average fewer votes to elect a Labour MP than a Tory MP.............
#42
Not sure of the Canadian system, but all PR systems (if that's what they have) run this risk - the UK's first-past-the-post system makes it less likely.
As another poster mentioned Canada is first past the post also. Some PR systems seem to work - I'm assuming the likes of Germany, France, Holland etc where most governments are coalitions so in itself PR isn't necessarily a problem. It seems in Canada the problem is more related to the existence of a regional nationalist party which distorts the process. It looks like the UK could be vulnerable to such behaviour also. I seem to remember in the last years of the Major government ,as the conservative majority declined with resignations and deaths of MPs they were forced to rely on the UU to win votes in the commons.
By the way - I'm surprised nobody in the media - especially the Tory-supporting element - have pointed out that, due to uneven population distribution, it takes on average fewer votes to elect a Labour MP than a Tory MP.............
I think that's mainly due to the distribution of voters - there are more very safe conservative seats than labour ones. I think it's also the case that the constituencies vary in size with conservative ones tending to be a little larger on average. The boundary commission can catch up with population movements in time to even out constituency sizes. I'm not sure what the % is but I'd guess that the conservatives need 4 or 5% more of the popular vote to have parity on numbers of MPs with labour.
As another poster mentioned Canada is first past the post also. Some PR systems seem to work - I'm assuming the likes of Germany, France, Holland etc where most governments are coalitions so in itself PR isn't necessarily a problem. It seems in Canada the problem is more related to the existence of a regional nationalist party which distorts the process. It looks like the UK could be vulnerable to such behaviour also. I seem to remember in the last years of the Major government ,as the conservative majority declined with resignations and deaths of MPs they were forced to rely on the UU to win votes in the commons.
By the way - I'm surprised nobody in the media - especially the Tory-supporting element - have pointed out that, due to uneven population distribution, it takes on average fewer votes to elect a Labour MP than a Tory MP.............
I think that's mainly due to the distribution of voters - there are more very safe conservative seats than labour ones. I think it's also the case that the constituencies vary in size with conservative ones tending to be a little larger on average. The boundary commission can catch up with population movements in time to even out constituency sizes. I'm not sure what the % is but I'd guess that the conservatives need 4 or 5% more of the popular vote to have parity on numbers of MPs with labour.
#44
Binned by Muderators










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC











I noticed the National tonight had a short feature on the UK election. It mentioned that some academics had produced a report on the experiences of minority goverments worldwide which cited the canadian federal parliament as the prime example of a dysfunctional aggressive parliament. Is the canadian minority government situation one to be avoided at all costs?
#45
Quite. There's a strong school of thought that much of Canada's lauded stability and economically-less-messed-uppedness is a direct result of having a government that has been unable to pass any contentious legislation. While the three-way alliance of Libs, NDP and Bloc collapsed almost before it began at the end of 2008, it served its purpose in a way - Harper persuaded the GG to prorogue parliament to escape the inevitable confidence motion, and when they came back again there was a bit less ideological crap in the throne speech.



