Wildy immigration
Dec 2nd 2014 | 6:00 am
#31
Nuther day in paradise.ca
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,269
From: Ajax, Ontario
Re: Wildy immigration
Boring shit thread, I am outa here 
Dec 2nd 2014 | 6:03 am
#32
Thread Starter
half a century
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
Re: Wildy immigration
Oh I know I have previously recommended them. However? Seeing how they have been currently treating clients, I wouldnt now. One can change Ones opinion .
Dec 2nd 2014 | 6:07 am
#33
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 905
From: AB
Re: Wildy immigration
Of course people can change their mind, perhaps some should think twice before an endorcement, particularly if you haven't used them. Just saying....
Dec 2nd 2014 | 6:08 am
#34
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 905
From: AB
Re: Wildy immigration
Do we have any member left stranded and out of pocket?
Dec 2nd 2014 | 6:12 am
#35
Thread Starter
half a century
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
Dec 2nd 2014 | 6:33 am
#36
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
Re: Wildy immigration
it's a tricky one though i agree.
Dec 2nd 2014 | 9:08 am
#37
"In cruce vincam"
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,233
From: Mill Bay, Vancouver Island
Re: Wildy immigration
There are likely to be comparative newcomers to this site who will read this thread and be completely unaware of previous positive recommendations that Wildy Immigration got, at least relative to other consultants who have been pilloried on here in the past. I'm still not sure what he or his firm has actually done to anyone on the BE forum to warrant the attacks on his reputation.
To the Moderators, are there rules on this? If there are, why aren't they being implemented? Especially as no tangible evidence seems to have been offered. If there isn't a rule, I think there perhaps should be,or at least give Paul Wiley the opportunity to respond.
To the Moderators, are there rules on this? If there are, why aren't they being implemented? Especially as no tangible evidence seems to have been offered. If there isn't a rule, I think there perhaps should be,or at least give Paul Wiley the opportunity to respond.
Dec 2nd 2014 | 9:26 am
#38
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
Re: Wildy immigration
but how is this any different to the slagging of Brazalot?
Dec 2nd 2014 | 9:30 am
#40
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
Re: Wildy immigration
good point.
Dec 2nd 2014 | 9:57 am
#41
Thread Starter
half a century
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
Re: Wildy immigration
There are likely to be comparative newcomers to this site who will read this thread and be completely unaware of previous positive recommendations that Wildy Immigration got, at least relative to other consultants who have been pilloried on here in the past. I'm still not sure what he or his firm has actually done to anyone on the BE forum to warrant the attacks on his reputation.
To the Moderators, are there rules on this? If there are, why aren't they being implemented? Especially as no tangible evidence seems to have been offered. If there isn't a rule, I think there perhaps should be,or at least give Paul Wiley the opportunity to respond.
To the Moderators, are there rules on this? If there are, why aren't they being implemented? Especially as no tangible evidence seems to have been offered. If there isn't a rule, I think there perhaps should be,or at least give Paul Wiley the opportunity to respond.
Dec 2nd 2014 | 9:58 am
#42
Thread Starter
half a century
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,222
From: Sarf Lundun to East Van :)
Dec 2nd 2014 | 10:00 am
#43
Born again atheist
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Dec 2nd 2014 | 10:06 am
#44
"In cruce vincam"
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,233
From: Mill Bay, Vancouver Island
Re: Wildy immigration
I think the difference is that Brazalot has been consistently (if not always unanimously) vilified on this site, whereas Wildy has been generally praised and recommended to people as a "good egg". I still don't see why the mood has swung against him and his firm without any evidence. I haven't checked, but I think there are numerous examples cited of Brazalot not coming up to expectation. I don't think the same can be said of Wildy.
Dec 2nd 2014 | 10:10 am
#45
slanderer of the innocent
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
Re: Wildy immigration
hmm. I understand what you are saying, so maybe it's best to let this thread die. If Wildy is truly as shit as we all believe it is, people will start complaining soon enough.
