![]() |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Elizabeth I
(Post 8391809)
Therefore it was directed to the whole board, does that make it any better? That it was against everyone, all of us here because we of British extraction?
Anyway, there has been more than enough discussion of moderation on this thread, if you lot want to defend yourselves from the scurrilous accusations against you go ahead, but leave us mods out of it now. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393163)
Whinging pom is often just a gentle ribbing between nations of the same race (like Aussie convict) where <the removed term> is often based in racism rather than micky taking nationalism. IMO, the two shouldn't be equated. But then, I would say that as I am an Aussie :)
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8393195)
So what's the difference between calling a person from Australia an "Aussie", a British person a "Brit", or a person from Pakistan a "Paki"?
Surely they're all just shortened versions of their country of origin and should cause no offence? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393274)
Nothing wrong with it if an Australian says it because in Australia it always has just been a shortening....like we shorten all words....but in the UK the term Paki has been hijacked and taken on a much more sinister race based tone with a lot of British...so is best avoided there IMO....but then I'm not British so you lot may know more about it...
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393274)
Nothing wrong with it if an Australian says it because in Australia it always has just been a shortening....like we shorten all words....but in the UK the term Paki has been hijacked and taken on a much more sinister race based tone with a lot of British...so is best avoided there IMO....but then I'm not British so you lot may know more about it...
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Auld Yin
(Post 8393316)
IMO it should be avoided in Canada also. Regardless of its origins, it is now a racist word almost in the same realm as the N word. Non Pakistanis use it as a word used to denigrate and has no place in the lexicon of an educated society.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8393367)
Interestingly, i personally hear the term used much more frequently from non white British people.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393377)
I don't totally agree....Britain uses the word in that fashion but the UK does not have the cultural influence the USA does through movies so I think it is unfair to say all educated societies should stop using it as they do not think of it in that way....it has not become a world wide meaning.
I do agree with Auld Yin about the N word in such that it is derogatory in any context, even when it is being self imposed, in my opinion. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
You will see the word Aussie, Brit, Yank or Canuck quoted freely in the news media in North America and the UK, but I doubt you'll see the word Paki unless quoted in the context of a racist activity report.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Auld Yin
(Post 8393435)
You will see the word Aussie, Brit, Yank or Canuck quoted freely in the news media in North America and the UK, but I doubt you'll see the word Paki unless quoted in the context of a racist activity report.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393474)
So is saying Paki rather than Pakistani racist in the US and/or Canada then?
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8393489)
Yes.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393474)
So is saying Paki rather than Pakistani racist in the US and/or Canada then? Can any locals comment? Or do they just not shorten the word like we do?
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
There is a huge debate going on in Canada at the moment as to whether its National Anthem is sexist. I have to admit that it is great living in a country that is so devoid of any real issues that issues such as this one are mentioned in the throne speech:thumbsup:
You will find Canada way more PC than the UK. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8393532)
You will find Canada way more PC than the UK. In the major cities its probably a toss up, but Canada has a lot of small towns where PC just doesnt happen much, perhaps because old habits die hard and the non caucation population is still relatively low. In the UK its probably harder to get far enough away from some of the PC influences. But as usual generalisations about the UK or in particular Canada are hard to apply. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8393547)
In the UK its probably harder to get far enough away from some of the PC influences.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8393238)
I deleted a post where you called the OP a tosser. That is all I did. I didnt close the thread, I didnt delete your later remarks:rolleyes:
As you probably know by now, if you want to give constructive criticism then private messaging is the accepted medium, not posting on the forum. i understand the deletion, i simply felt it was in the tone of the thread and the word used as mild as the general insults from the o/p, who is conspicuous by his absence i note. anyway i think i have kicked the proverbial out of this one. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8393174)
Rae, i think a simple change of wording would suffice, given the feedback you've been given. Something like - "People who create threads of this nature are tossers".
This does not single out a poster. It is merely a generalisation such as, for example, directing the comment, "whinging, whinning, limey, poms and luddites" to the users of an internet forum. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by fish.01
(Post 8393274)
....but in the UK the term Paki has been hijacked and taken on a much more sinister race based tone with a lot of British...
Yeah I agree with you, Paki was used in a racist way, a nasty way in England. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Auld Yin
(Post 8393498)
Yes, it is racist in NA. Try calling a Pakistani "Paki" and see if you're still on your feet 2 seconds later. Black people use the N word freely when discussing/speaking to each other but will normally not countenance a caucasion doing so. I suggest the same applies to Pakistanis.
Claiming to be an abbreviation would not be a defence in any circumstance I can think of. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8393253)
It was not PERSONAL, and no one saw fit to report it... I didnt take offence at it, although I did observe that no good would come of it. Somehow I suspect if the mods had dissapeared it then there would have been far more wringing of hands anyway. Damned if we do , damned if we dont.
Anyway, there has been more than enough discussion of moderation on this thread, if you lot want to defend yourselves from the scurrilous accusations against you go ahead, but leave us mods out of it now. sowwy:( |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Political correctness, like many other practices here, is very polarized. With the occasional small iffy remark, I have deeply offended people, whereas I have met others who make some really bigoted remarks.
I think in the UK the issue people have isn't so much political correctness in the population but it's effect on local government to the point of absurdity. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8393532)
There is a huge debate going on in Canada at the moment as to whether its National Anthem is sexist. I have to admit that it is great living in a country that is so devoid of any real issues that issues such as this one are mentioned in the throne speech:thumbsup:
You will find Canada way more PC than the UK. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Can anybody explain this to me - agree that mobile phone service is expensive here bla blah blah....but how come they can give unlimited free calls after 7 pm to 6 am next day (or 6 for some)........if they can do this then it proves that they can surely balance the cost reasonably so we pay a decent price .......if the service is so expensive that they make us pay so much during daytime usage then how come it becomes FREE after 7 pm. This just doesnt make sense.
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 8390036)
Wholly agree. I just want a phone that makes and receives calls. The only gizmo I need with it is GSM. I don't want text messaging, GSM, games, internet.......
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by gingnut
(Post 8395099)
There are real issues in Canada, but Canadians would rather not deal with them. So we debate a single syllable word in the anthem.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by bsmith
(Post 8395403)
Yeah, but you must agree that having the word ***t in your national anthem wasn't the greatest of ideas was it. Someone was bound to pick up on it eventually.
what happened?:confused: |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Miss Clinique
(Post 8390383)
I am without GHD's does that make me a luddite?
Please say yes - then my OH will HAVE to buy me a new pair.:D Hell yeah!!
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8390613)
Free? There is a $6Bn cost to build and host that someone has to pay for, and tickets for the events were far from free unless you happen to be the chairman of coca cola or some similar sponsoring multinational!
Someone told me the cheapest tickets for the hockey started at $800... not sure if thats true or not though. I do know they werent free though!
Originally Posted by Kiwilass
(Post 8391170)
Oh, this is what she was talking about! :D ha.
ps - Luddite: The term "Luddite fallacy" has become a concept in neoclassical economics reflecting the belief that labour-saving technologies (i.e., technologies that increase output-per-worker) increase unemployment by reducing demand for labour. This argument may be decried fallacious if—instead of seeking to keep production constant by employing a smaller, more productive workforce—employers increase production while keeping workforce size constant. - I googled it :) |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8389435)
I'll give you whinging and whinning, even limey and poms. But luddites - I think you'd best go and look that one up in a dictionary.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by DandNHill
(Post 8398723)
The Luddites were a social movement of British textile artisans in the nineteenth century who protested—often by destroying mechanized looms—against the changes produced by the Industrial Revolution, which they felt were leaving them without work and changing their entire way of life.
History is always written by the victors and all that. |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
So in idiot terms "Luddite" when reffered to in modern terms strictly speaking means someone whos a bit p*****d off at losing out to modern technology, and therefore revolts against it to put things back to the way they were.
Not too appropriate for an internet forum (which can also be likened to Facebook or such,) that has taken over the need to converse face to face. Should we do the done thing and instead of burning bras burn our laptops and all arrange to meet in a central point to discuss things like in the good old days :confused: ;) |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by DandNHill
(Post 8398723)
The Luddites were a social movement of British textile artisans in the nineteenth century who protested—often by destroying mechanized looms—against the changes produced by the Industrial Revolution, which they felt were leaving them without work and changing their entire way of life.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by DandNHill
(Post 8398723)
The Luddites were a social movement of British textile artisans in the nineteenth century who protested—often by destroying mechanized looms—against the changes produced by the Industrial Revolution, which they felt were leaving them without work and changing their entire way of life.
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8400164)
Fascinating insight. Who was their leader again?
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by bsmith
(Post 8400181)
....Wasn't it Laura Ashley?
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by bsmith
(Post 8400181)
....Wasn't it Laura Ashley?
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 8400164)
Fascinating insight. Who was their leader again?
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by flashman
(Post 8400210)
Ned Ludd
Can you possibly think we didn't know that? |
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
I tried to explain to my Canadian boss that "paki" is an offensive term in Britain and I think he thought I was mental..... His response was "so, what should they be called?", he had a point I guess, I didn't have an answer to that...
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by G77
(Post 8400650)
I tried to explain to my Canadian boss that "paki" is an offensive term in Britain and I think he thought I was mental..... His response was "so, what should they be called?", he had a point I guess, I didn't have an answer to that...
|
Re: what's wrong with you lot?
Originally Posted by G77
(Post 8400650)
I tried to explain to my Canadian boss that "paki" is an offensive term in Britain and I think he thought I was mental..... His response was "so, what should they be called?", he had a point I guess, I didn't have an answer to that...
Really infuriates me because its such a widespread term to refer to people of Indian origin IMO. Also IIRC calling an Indian a Paki is offensive for one part because they are from India not Pakistan. Now, I can understand what your boss is saying, and referring to "them" in that manner is derogatory. How about telling him to learn who "they" are, where "they" are from and refer to "them" in the correct term. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:32 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.