![]() |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 11427926)
The legion here is quite progressive. Women have been allowed in the lounge bar for a few years now. Some of the old timers moan when they do though:(
|
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11427890)
Unfortunately civilian deaths are guaranteed, both there and here.
And given the remark upthread from either caretaker or yourself that airstrikes in Iraq or Syria aren't making and won't make the slightest difference towards the marvellous euphemism of "degrading" the militants, why bother? If the West (US lead in most instances) stopped behaving like the militants' caricature of them in the Middle East, could they break the eternal cycle of violence? I don't know until it's tried. But, as usual, nothing is how it's portrayed. Why doesn't anybody ever think about the oil addiction? |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 11427946)
I heard that even in the 1980s the bars used to have a special "lady entrance." :blink:
|
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 11427946)
I heard that even in the 1980s the bars used to have a special "lady entrance." :blink:
|
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11428002)
Country hotel bars here still had the signs up over the doors then but the last place I was in that had the 2 rooms segregated "Gentlemen" and "Ladies & Escorts" and enforced it was the Marina Hotel in Thunder Bay about 40 years ago.
I think it was still that way well into the eighties. We (the men & the gentlemen) all shared the same bog though. |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
ISIS is hard on drinking.
|
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11428010)
ISIS is hard on drinking.
It was called the Isis and *shock* it's now on Facebook. Time to get the scimitars out, I'd say. |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11428004)
The pub in Newcastle I drank in most often when I was about 19 or 20 had a men only bar and a ladies' & gentlemen's lounge with a separate entrance.
I think it was still that way well into the eighties. We (the men & the gentlemen) all shared the same bog though. Back on topic, I think that a good start would be to stop trying to enforce the Sykes-Picot "national" boundaries and allow the Middle East to form new administrations that reflected the shared interests of the various groups of people who live there. |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 11428015)
Back on topic, I think that a good start would be to stop trying to enforce the Sykes-Picot "national" boundaries and allow the Middle East to form new administrations that reflected the shared interests of the various groups of people who live there. You're right though.. |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11427987)
I believe your "here" is not the same as my "here", but that aside, why is that the case?
And given the remark upthread from either caretaker or yourself that airstrikes in Iraq or Syria aren't making and won't make the slightest difference towards the marvellous euphemism of "degrading" the militants, why bother? If the West (US lead in most instances) stopped behaving like the militants' caricature of them in the Middle East, could they break the eternal cycle of violence? I don't know until it's tried. But, as usual, nothing is how it's portrayed. Why doesn't anybody ever think about the oil addiction? Can't speak for Caretaker, but personally I think air strikes will seriously weaken IS military capability and eliminate many of their soldiers. This one is not about oil it's, about cultural dominance. We (West) are as guilty as IS in asserting our cultural values, but it is a case of defeat or be defeated. |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11428038)
My "here" was meant as the West: Canada, UK, Texas ;)
Can't speak for Caretaker, but personally I think air strikes will seriously weaken IS military capability and eliminate many of their soldiers. This one is not about oil it's, about cultural dominance. We (West) are as guilty as IS in asserting our cultural values, but it is a case of defeat or be defeated. Do you know who? I don't. How apocalyptic. Do you remember the domino theory? |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11428041)
I don't want to come across as obsessed with oil and the politics and power surrounding it, but ISIS are selling oil to someone to finance their operations.
Do you know who? I don't. How apocalyptic. Do you remember the domino theory? |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11428041)
How apocalyptic. Do you remember the domino theory? |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11428051)
ISIS is the latest guise of what some politicos are terming death cultists. In their ambition to form a state oil is an invaluable resource. Is that economic threat the only or even main reason the US and others are risking a major war, unlikely. I think a formed IS would be serious existential threat to Israel because unlike Iran they have an expansionist stance. And they are mad/crazy; they are not merely proposing a fundamental interpretation of Islam they are undertaking and propagating jihad. This entire ISIS movement is about jihad.
It means resistance or struggle. Contrast the word crusade which was used by GWB when his father, GHWB, former Director of the CIA ,told his dummy son in 2001 to go and screw up the middle east and most especially Saddam Hussein in the sweet cause of revenge. All recent events follow. |
Re: US step up war on ISIL
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11428038)
personally I think air strikes will seriously weaken IS military capability and eliminate many of their soldiers.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:11 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.