![]() |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 6506670)
Did you look at Steve's link yet? It's not a matter of wanting it one way or t'ther. It's what we're going to have.
With enough "clean" energy and renewable resource technology to substitute mineral oil based products with artificially generated "oil" products, I personally think its feasable to carry on regardless, but in a slightly different way. Major plastics companies for example are already dabbling with vegetable based plastics. Biofuels are practical, but its currently a question of energy usage and priority management. Given the way agricultural caps and the like work, it must be currently feasable to grow sufficient crops (taking CO2 from the atmosphere in the process) to feed everyone, and meet oil demand, especially if homes and businesses convert to electric heating (from Nuclear or renewable sources) and local transportation can be done with plug in battery driven vehicle or smaller more economical biofuel burners. Same lifestyle...different mechanism, see? |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Souvenir
(Post 6506709)
I don't think the Chinese and Irish immigrants are as poor as they used to be.
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 6506734)
No, but there might be plenty of ex-Boeing workers looking for a new job. :p
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6506649)
Then the question of security and policing the waste and refining side of the operation in these terrorist paranoid times also becomes of crucial importance.
If I were even more cynical that I already am, I might think that the oil lobby doesn't want a nuclear-powered world because it'll pull the rug out from under their captive market. Cheap (relatively) and widespread nuclear power would hasten the development of mass-market hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles (or even real-world-viable plug-in vehicles), as off-peak electricity could be used to hydrolise water; domestic and industrial heating/power requirements would not need oil- and gas-fired power stations to the same extent they do now, etc etc etc. The competing demands and aspirations of the global oil and nuclear industries, and the shifting views of Western politicians as they try to balance these with everything else going on, must have been the subject of a good book or two... anybody read any they'd recommend? |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6506754)
Ah, and there's the rub. What with the US seemingly about to join a diplomatic love-in with North Korea as they hand over information on their nuclear programme, the balance of opinion - in the current US administration at least - seems to be that nuclear power is too much of a liability to "let" emerging economies have access to it.
If you were more cynical...yeah right, as if:) Point taken about the oil lobby. That's not cynicism, its reality. Books? Do people still read them? Isnt that what turned into the internet of sumfink? |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6506865)
If you were more cynical...yeah right, as if:)
Books? Do people still read them? Isnt that what turned into the internet of sumfink? I'm reading the new James Bond at the mo - Sebastian Faulks does a very good pastiche of Ian Fleming's style. I'm only 100 pages or so into it, but it's a rollicking good yarn so far.... |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6506754)
Ah, and there's the rub. What with the US seemingly about to join a diplomatic love-in with North Korea as they hand over information on their nuclear programme, the balance of opinion - in the current US administration at least - seems to be that nuclear power is too much of a liability to "let" emerging economies have access to it.
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 6506984)
It might also be a consideration that the leading vendor of nuclear power plants is not the US but that nation of cheese eating surrender monkeys.
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6506880)
Couldn't disagree more :p. Books don't run out of batteries or break when you drop them or spill tea over them.
I'm reading the new James Bond at the mo - Sebastian Faulks does a very good pastiche of Ian Fleming's style. I'm only 100 pages or so into it, but it's a rollicking good yarn so far.... Im still reading "kids" books...I recently thoroughly enjoyed Northern Lights / Golden Compass as it is here...off to the library for more. I just need to squeeze past all the people lined up there for their internet access |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6507089)
Thats the one hes driving a Bentley in right?
Im still reading "kids" books...I recently thoroughly enjoyed Northern Lights / Golden Compass as it is here...off to the library for more. I just need to squeeze past all the people lined up there for their internet access I liked Pullman's stuff - much better written than Harry Potter, with which it always seems to be compared. The other two in the series are great reads too... Hey, since this thread started on oil and drifted into politics, this topic brings us neatly onto religion: why is it that the Church (primarly evangelicals with JK Rowling, primarily Catholics with Philip Pullman) get so upset about wizardry or anti-religious allegory, yet are so quick to leap to the defence of heavy-handed pro-religious claptrap like Narnia or the schmaltz that was the Bridge to Terabithia? (I think I may have given away my own views on the matter by my editorial tone..... :) ) |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6507153)
Yup, he has a customised Continental. The book's set in the mid-60s, so it's probably one of these http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C31678?pt=pf although possibly with different coachwork.
I liked Pullman's stuff - much better written than Harry Potter, with which it always seems to be compared. The other two in the series are great reads too... Hey, since this thread started on oil and drifted into politics, this topic brings us neatly onto religion: why is it that the Church (primarly evangelicals with JK Rowling, primarily Catholics with Philip Pullman) get so upset about wizardry or anti-religious allegory, yet are so quick to leap to the defence of heavy-handed pro-religious claptrap like Narnia or the schmaltz that was the Bridge to Terabithia? (I think I may have given away my own views on the matter by my editorial tone..... :) ) Since the inevitable (and welcome) drift is well underway, I have a trivia question from another forum which connects vaguely to Oak's last post. "What Author accidentally spawned a Church from one of his most famous novels I am not talking about the one were the Author set up the church after writing a novel. Because believe it or not its happened a few times anyway question is Author, Book, and Church bonus point for the two characters in the story that set up the church. As a hint another one of his books became a film and this book is currently in production for a film. Are you a good Citizen?" Typos inside the quotes are not mine. :) |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6507153)
Hey, since this thread started on oil and drifted into politics, this topic brings us neatly onto religion: why is it that the Church (primarly evangelicals with JK Rowling, primarily Catholics with Philip Pullman) get so upset about wizardry or anti-religious allegory, yet are so quick to leap to the defence of heavy-handed pro-religious claptrap like Narnia or the schmaltz that was the Bridge to Terabithia?
Simply because there is no monopoly on hypocrisy, its not just for politicians;) |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 6507251)
Ah, well. 5 pages and 70 posts (all of them by the way, well considered and interesting) on topic ain't half bad. Thanks everyone ... you see it can be done here after all.
Since the inevitable (and welcome) drift is well underway, I have a trivia question from another forum which connects vaguely to Oak's last post. "What Author accidentally spawned a Church from one of his most famous novels I am not talking about the one were the Author set up the church after writing a novel. Because believe it or not its happened a few times anyway question is Author, Book, and Church bonus point for the two characters in the story that set up the church. As a hint another one of his books became a film and this book is currently in production for a film. Are you a good Citizen?" Typos inside the quotes are not mine. :) |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by johnh009
(Post 6506555)
What's your opinion on coal in the UK? They have 300 to 400 years of proven reserves. With oil at approx. $136 a barrel and coal at $1 a barrel coal may be a good bet, given now that we have clean (or cleaner) burning coal and oil from coal technology.
<runs and hides> |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6507360)
The Church of All Worlds, inspired by Robert Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land"?
I think it was Novo that guided me towards The Black Swan - which I have to say is completely difficult to read but well worth it from the bits I could fathom out!!!!!!!! |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:45 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.