![]() |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by johnh009;
What's your opinion on coal in the UK? They have 300 to 400 years of proven reserves. With oil at approx. $136 a barrel and coal at $1 a barrel coal may be a good bet, given now that we have clean (or cleaner) burning coal and oil from coal technology.
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 6506569)
Unfortunately there are no miners anymore.
Its irrelevant. The big picture is not energy source reserves, its global CO2 emissions and the environmental repercussions. "Acid Rain" type pollution from sulphurous fuels, or the environmental scarring from mining fuel resources are red herrings in this discussion. Yes, its bad for the local ecosystems, but its not the same global threat that simply converting the fuel into energy is. The only practical proven technology that can meet energy demands right NOW without CO2 emissions is Nuclear, and although the waste is a serious issue, its more of a long term problem that can be resolved a ways down the road. Global warming and the burgeoning energy demands of the developing nations need a solution in the very near future. Waiting for renewable energy technology to rise to the challenge is just fiddling while Rome (and the rest of the world) burns in my opinion. |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 6506565)
re: dirty oil.
... and it's not just in the US (link is a bit dated, but whatever). http://www.polarisinstitute.org/fede...y_be_oil_sands But it is not as if the industry is doing nothing. As for Obama I have always suspected he was more flash than substance, we'll see I guess. Where is he going to get the 1.4 million barrels per day and growing to replace this "dirty oil" he no longer wants? How is he going tell whether or not it's dirty or clean oil? Or is he just going to refuse to buy oil from Alberta? Saskatchewan also has tar sands deposits they are talking of developing, is he going to refuse their oil too? Discuss.:p |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6506595)
Where is he going to get the 1.4 million barrels per day and growing to replace this "dirty oil" he no longer wants?
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6506595)
Where is he going to get the 1.4 million barrels per day and growing to replace this "dirty oil" he no longer wants?
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6506595)
I am not trying to make excuses for the industry because I am very much opposed to the current pace of development.
But it is not as if the industry is doing nothing. As for Obama I have always suspected he was more flash than substance, we'll see I guess. Where is he going to get the 1.4 million barrels per day and growing to replace this "dirty oil" he no longer wants? How is he going tell whether or not it's dirty or clean oil? Or is he just going to refuse to buy oil from Alberta? Saskatchewan also has tar sands deposits they are talking of developing, is he going to refuse their oil too? Discuss.:p Of course he is trying to get as many on side using the arguement that he is against 'dirty' oil. Then he will get elected, and then.......... "insert excuse as to why they need it, but will continue to lobby for ways to make it more environmentally friendly to extract / refine" To "Insert excuse as to why it is too expensive in todays economic climes to change the way things are - and the countries economy is our top priority right now" Ending with "f**k it lets go to war with someone" |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by iaink;
Pay oilsands wages and Im sure you would find some.
Its irrelevant. The big picture is not energy source reserves, its global CO2 emissions and the environmental repercussions. "Acid Rain" type pollution from sulphurous fuels, or the environmental scarring from mining fuel resources are red herrings in this discussion. Yes, its bad for the local ecosystems, but its not the same global threat that simply converting the fuel into energy is. The only practical proven technology that can meet energy demands right NOW without CO2 emissions is Nuclear, and although the waste is a serious issue, its more of a long term problem that can be resolved a ways down the road. Global warming and the burgeoning energy demands of the developing nations need a solution in the very near future. Waiting for renewable energy technology to rise to the challenge is just fiddling while Rome (and the rest of the world) burns in my opinion. I agree with the rest of your post as well. Until a few years ago I was dead against nuclear, but despite the problems "down the road", I now believe that we will need one (but only one) new generation of nuclear while we wean ourselves off an energy intensive economy / lifestyle. |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by mandymoochops;
Its the old adage of in like a firework a like a damp squib.
Of course he is trying to get as many on side using the arguement that he is against 'dirty' oil. Then he will get elected, and then.......... "insert excuse as to why they need it, but will continue to lobby for ways to make it more environmentally friendly to extract / refine" To "Insert excuse as to why it is too expensive in todays economic climes to change the way things are - and the countries economy is our top priority right now" Ending with "f**k it lets go to war with someone" |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Did anyone see this on "The National" last night.
http://www.cbc.ca/mrl3/23745/thenati...out-062508.wmv |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 6506628)
I now believe that we will need one (but only one) new generation of nuclear while we wean ourselves off an energy intensive economy / lifestyle.
If people wanted an energy frugal lifestyle here then they could be out living in tents, weaving hemp into bicycles already...but I dont see much of that. So given we need energy, and global warming is happening now, and places like India and China, with gigantic populations, are clamouring to catch up with western ideals, not only will we need more Nuclear capability to replace the current fossil fuel powered stations and our own future demand, so to will the developing nations, and quickly, and on a larger scale. Then the question of security and policing the waste and refining side of the operation in these terrorist paranoid times also becomes of crucial importance. |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by iaink;
But nobody WANTS to wean themselves off our energy intensive economy. For gods sake, a 1.8l powered car is considered "economy" here. Fuel consumption overall has got worse in the last 5 years for economy cars!
If people wanted an energy frugal lifestyle here then they could be out living in tents, weaving hemp into bicycles already...but I dont see much of that. So given we need energy, and global warming is happening now, and places like India and China, with gigantic populations, are clamouring to catch up with western ideals, not only will we need more Nuclear capability to replace the current fossil fuel powered stations and our own future demand, so to will the developing nations, and quickly, and on a larger scale. Then the question of security and policing the waste and refining side of the operation in these terrorist paranoid times also becomes of crucial importance. |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
I was under the impression that the move back to coal was well underway.
Scrubbing technology seems pretty good these days. |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6506649)
But nobody WANTS to wean themselves off our energy intensive economy. For gods sake, a 1.8l powered car is considered "economy" here. Fuel consumption overall has got worse in the last 5 years for economy cars!
The North American aviation industry will also hopefully have to take a long, hard look at itself soon. The best thing the US and Canada could do is encourage investment in a continental rail network. It's been done before, and it could be done again if the will is there. |
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 6506696)
The best thing the US and Canada could do is encourage investment in a continental rail network. It's been done before, and it could be done again if the will is there.
|
Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:56 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.