British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   Stupid to the Last Drop (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/stupid-last-drop-545339/)

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 1:30 am

Stupid to the Last Drop
 
"In its desperate search for oil and gas riches, Alberta is destroying itself. As the world teeters on the edge of catastrophic climate change, Alberta plunges ahead with uncontrolled development of its fossil fuels, levelling its northern Boreal forest to get at the oil sands, and carpet-bombing its southern half with tens of thousands of gas wells. In so doing, it is running out of water, destroying its range land, wiping out its forests and wildlife and spewing huge amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, adding to global warming at a rate that is unrivalled in Canada or almost anywhere else in the world. It’s digging, drilling and blasting its way to oblivion, becoming the ultimate symbol of Canada’s – and the world’s – pathological will to self-destruct.

Nowhere has the world seen such colossal environmental destruction as is being wreaked on Alberta. At one point the province even went so far as to consider a scientist’s idea of nuking its underbelly to get at the tar sands. Stupid to the Last Drop looks at the increasingly violent geopolitical forces that are gathering as the world’s gas and oil dwindle and the Age of Oil begins its inevitable slide towards oblivion. As Canadians deplete their energy reserves, selling them off to Americans at bargain-basement prices, no thought is given to conservation or the long-term needs of the nation."

William Marsden.

Discuss.

iaink Jun 26th 2008 1:40 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6505824)

Discuss.

Why dont you go first for once?

Rete Jun 26th 2008 1:43 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 6505885)
Why dont you go first for once?


Why change protocol?:p

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 2:02 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
The quote is a tad sensationalist and dramatic, it probably overstates a few examples, but in general I couldn't argue with it.

My point of view, though, is that Alberta (well, the oil companies) are not doing this for the hell of it. The oil sands projects are a symptom or a result of the insanity of our Western lifestyles.

It's all very well bemoaning the environmental destruction, but we're still building 3,000-4,000 ft2 houses with triple garages, centrally heated and air conditioned. We're still building F-350s and Yukons and Suburbans which are used for commuting.

We're still filling our houses with ever more electronic gadgets which are never turned off.

The real question isn't the why-oh-why's of the oil sands, it's the why-oh-why do we need to produce this oil.

mandymoochops Jun 26th 2008 2:29 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
I was discussing this last night with a couple of friends - one who had just come back from a stint in Fort Mac.

He says the technology up there is just phenominal - the money being spent etc - they have just had 30 trucks delivered to their site alone at a cost of 4 million each and another plant is being built to increase the current production and it will go from 225k barrels a day to 550k by 2012.

We got on to discussing the ethanol alternative, and I may be wrong just relaying info - but if they took all of the barley, wheat etc currently in the states to produce ethanol, it would only cover 5% of what is currently being produced oilwise for automobile usage.

Where there's brass there's muck as the old saying goes and with guys being paid upwards of $2000 to work Canada day alone (in a normal mechanics job), and the revenue that the companies get, its not going to go away anytime soon.

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 2:39 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by mandymoochops;
its not going to go away anytime soon.

Many think it is, though.

I agree with jings that the rhetoric is a bit over the top, but would add that in terms of the very useful metric Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI), the oils sands are a ridiculous waste of resources.

Link added: www.EROIE.com

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 2:56 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
Interesting to see what the head of OPEC said on French TV today (I read about it in the Torygraph). I take one of his comments to be an instruction to the USA to put pressure on Israel not to attack Iran.

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 2:57 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Souvenir;
Interesting to see what the head of OPEC said on French TV today (I read about it in the Torygraph). I take one of his comments to be an instruction to the USA to put pressure on Israel not to attack Iran.

link please?

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 3:01 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506203)
link please?

www.telegraph.co.uk

Lazy git.

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 3:03 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Souvenir;

Ah. Merci.

Edit. I see what you mean.

mandymoochops Jun 26th 2008 3:08 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506155)
Many think it is, though.I agree with jings that the rhetoric is a bit over the top, but would add that in terms of the very useful metric Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI), the oils sands are a ridiculous waste of resources.

Link added: www.EROIE.com

In what respect though? Because the companies aren't going to stop until they have exhausted the supply, which is currently good for about 50 years with todays technology.

My point was that just because its environmentally unfriendly will not stop the excavation - the whole lot running out is a different matter.

So if the many think soon is because of pressure due to the production ethics, I would suggest that the many might be wrong :(

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 3:13 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506215)
Ah. Merci.

Edit. I see what you mean.

Yes, you are a lazy git.

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 3:14 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
How much would energy costs have to go up before your consumption patterns and your lifestyle were seriously altered? What if gasoline prices here in Canada were the same as the UK at $2.60 per litre, or if domestic gas and electricity prices doubled?

What would it take to make you...

Move to a smaller house.
Get rid of a vehicle(s).
Only take local holidays.

etc. etc.

iaink Jun 26th 2008 3:15 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
Wasnt he also saying that OPEC output was meeting current demand, and that increasing output was pointless lipservice.

Seems to me the current "high" cost of oil is due to speculation thats based on political instability in the oil producing regions, rather than true supply and demand market forces. Could be that bubble will burst and prices will come down again, or it could be that demand from China and other developing nations will keep the price high regardless.

I read somewhere that saudi oil costs less than $10 a barrel to get out of the ground and to the end user, but oil sand oil only starts to break even with the extraction cost at $70....and I dont know if they figured in the cost to return the landscape to the way they found it in that figure, which the oil companies are legally commited too. Given the way that they dragged their heels in cases like the Exxon Valdes cleanup, you have to wonder if they are really going to do that anyway.

I wouldnt say selling oil to the US at $136 a barrel is "bargain basement", and as oil prices increase north america WILL have to make changes in its energy use profile, as has happened in Europe as a result of higher taxation levels focusing minds on economy. Will that happen soon enough? Probably not Im afraid. If $136 is an inflated price, then better to sell to the US now at $66 a barrel profit, than to hold on to this resource and sell after the bubble burst for only $30 profit?

Never mind the economics of the situation, the global environmental effect is the real issue, and with china racing to catch up with a US style consumer society, Im afraid the outlook is very bleak for my childrens children. I first became aware of global warming in 1989, reading Ben Eltons book Stark, and frankly, what has changed in 20 years that will make enough difference to prevent us passing a tipping point at which point it will be too late?

Oil supply is not a concern in the short term, there is more extractable oil reserves known about now than there was 30 or 40 years ago when people first started to say it was running out. As the price increases, so does the level of technology available to to extract it where it was previously impractical or to make it from other sources, but thats a dangerous game, and even at $5000 a barrel, eventually you cant extract what is no longer there. However, it doesnt matter if oil runs out in 50 or 100 or 1000 years time. If we dont wean ourselves off carbon fuels in the much shorter term, it wont matter anyway.

It seems to me the North American majority seems to be pinning all its hopes on some sort of "Star Trek" solution..by which I mean they expect the engineers to pull some fantastic (unnamed) solution to the problem out of there arse at the last minute, to narrowly avert disaster. Unfortunately things on this planet seldom work out quite like that.

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 3:16 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by mandymoochops;
In what respect though? Because the companies aren't going to stop until they have exhausted the supply, which is currently good for about 50 years with todays technology.

My point was that just because its environmentally unfriendly will not stop the excavation - the whole lot running out is a different matter.

So if the many think soon is because of pressure due to the production ethics, I would suggest that the many might be wrong :(

Fair enough mandy, what I meant is that the oil based economy is considered by many to be in its death throes.

And from souv's telegraph link...

"A litre of unleaded petrol currently costs an average of £1.18. Every dollar increase in the price of oil adds about 0.42p to a litre of petrol."

Eh? How does that work? If crude is now $130 US/barrel doing the conversions says that at 1.18 pounds a litre that cost of the crude is about 40% of the UK pump price. An increase of 0.42 p / litre corresponds to an increase of ~$US 6 per barrel. Somebody's telling porkies.

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 3:19 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506155)
Many think it is, though.

I agree with jings that the rhetoric is a bit over the top, but would add that in terms of the very useful metric Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI), the oils sands are a ridiculous waste of resources.

Link added: www.EROIE.com

Link doesn't work for me, Novo. But I agree, the final product of the oil sands is synthetic crude, which takes about half a barrel of oil equivalent and two barrels of water to produce one barrel of synthetic crude. Ridiculously inefficient, but if there's a market for it willing to pay, then it will be produced.

That's why there is talk of building a nuclear power plant up there to produce the steam that's needed. But even if that happens, it's going to be 10 years away.

Steve_P Jun 26th 2008 3:26 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 6506239)
How much would energy costs have to go up before your consumption patterns and your lifestyle were seriously altered? What if gasoline prices here in Canada were the same as the UK at $2.60 per litre, or if domestic gas and electricity prices doubled?

What would it take to make you...

Move to a smaller house.
Get rid of a vehicle(s).
Only take local holidays.

etc. etc.

By today's standards we already live in a relatively small home so a move wouldn't gain us much. We have replaced all of our windows for more up to date ones, replaced the furnace last year with a 94% efficient one. About the only thing left we could do is have the siding taken off the house, have foam board insulation applied and the siding replaced.

We could get rid of one vehicle but it's not driven much anyway so minor gain there. Bought a hybrid in 2006.

We normally don't take big holidays the recent Hawaii trip was our first trip of any significance since 1999.

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 3:33 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506243)
Somebody's telling porkies.

Surely not!!!!!!!

The Alberta converters generate a large and growing amount of petroleum coke. Some is used as a fuel source but most is "stockpiled for future use".

Digging a sodding great hole in the ground, filling it with waste and then covering it over is, to my mind, a fairly loose interpretation of the word "stockpiling".

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 3:33 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty;
Link doesn't work for me, Novo. But I agree, the final product of the oil sands is synthetic crude, which takes about half a barrel of oil equivalent and two barrels of water to produce one barrel of synthetic crude. Ridiculously inefficient, but if there's a market for it willing to pay, then it will be produced.

That's why there is talk of building a nuclear power plant up there to produce the steam that's needed. But even if that happens, it's going to be 10 years away.

My bad. http://www.eroei.com/

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 3:40 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
Let me throw a bit more fuel on the fire (sorry).

Short term: The fact that the price of crude is denominated in US $ and that said $ is down the tubes against a basket of other currencies is more or less being ignored in the discussion of current oil prices.
A favourite conspiracy theory around a couple of years ago was that it was Iraq's "threat" to price its crude exports in euro which prompted Cheney et al. to invade and overthrow SH.

Longer term: I know the convoluted history of all this (NEP and all), but why, oh why can a provincial government make decisions like the irresponsible exploitation of the oil sands without input from the ROC?

Steve_P Jun 26th 2008 3:49 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506324)
Longer term: I know the convoluted history of all this (NEP and all), but why, oh why can a provincial government make decisions like the irresponsible exploitation of the oil sands without input from the ROC?

I feeling particularly dumb this a.m.

What is ROC?

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 3:54 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Steve_P;
I feeling particularly dumb this a.m.

What is ROC?

Oh, sorry. Rest of Canada. I've probably misused it, its normal meaning is Canada minus Quebec.

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 3:55 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Steve_P (Post 6506344)
I feeling particularly dumb this a.m.

What is ROC?

Rest of the country? Guessing here.

JonboyE Jun 26th 2008 3:55 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 6506241)
Wasnt he also saying that OPEC output was meeting current demand, and that increasing output was pointless lipservice.

Seems to me the current "high" cost of oil is due to speculation thats based on political instability in the oil producing regions, rather than true supply and demand market forces. Could be that bubble will burst and prices will come down again ...

I suspect there is a lot of truth in this. I don't think it is a coincidence that the recent spike in oil prices has happened at the same time as the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Investment funds taken out of the mortgage market have to go somewhere and a lot has ended up in commodities. It is basic economics that the price of a good will rise until it uses up all the money that is available to spend on it.

We are told that the liquidity crunch will take 2-3 years to work its way through the world's financial markets so I can see oil prices remaining artificially high for some time to come, but they will eventually return to a price that keeps demand and supply in balance. I wish I knew what price that will be.


I read somewhere that saudi oil costs less than $10 a barrel to get out of the ground and to the end user, but oil sand oil only starts to break even with the extraction cost at $70....and I dont know if they figured in the cost to return the landscape to the way they found it in that figure, which the oil companies are legally commited too.
Seven or eight years ago I remember someone saying that the oil sands oil cost $40 a barrel to extract, but I can't remember who or have a source. If they were right then $70 may include remediation.


Given the way that they dragged their heels in cases like the Exxon Valdes cleanup, you have to wonder if they are really going to do that anyway.
There was a report on this on the radio last night. Exxon were originally ordered to pay $5 billion in compensation. 16 years later, by appealing every court decision against them they have managed to whittle this down to $500 million (not yet paid). Last year they made $41 billion profit.


Oil supply is not a concern in the short term, there is more extractable oil reserves known about now than there was 30 or 40 years ago when people first started to say it was running out. As the price increases, so does the level of technology available to to extract it where it was previously impractical ...
This is so true as well. There is more than enough oil in the world. Much more important is a) how much are we prepared to pay for it and b) how are we going to live with the consequences of using it.

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 3:56 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
<whispers> Russian Orthodox Church.



or maybe Rest of Canada.

JonboyE Jun 26th 2008 3:59 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506324)
Longer term: I know the convoluted history of all this (NEP and all), but why, oh why can a provincial government make decisions like the irresponsible exploitation of the oil sands without input from the ROC?

Because they pay for the rest of Canada?

Steve_P Jun 26th 2008 4:00 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506355)
Oh, sorry. Rest of Canada. I've probably misused it, its normal meaning is Canada minus Quebec.


Originally Posted by Souvenir (Post 6506360)
Rest of the country? Guessing here.

Thank you both. ;)

The answer lies in the fact that it is in the constitution (I believe) that the provinces not the federal government are responsible for their resources.

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 4:03 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 6506362)

There was a report on this on the radio last night. Exxon were originally ordered to pay $5 billion in compensation. 16 years later, by appealing every court decision against them they have managed to whittle this down to $500 million (not yet paid). Last year they made $41 billion profit.

Unfortunately this says more about the idiocy and impotence of the US legal system than it does about oil companies.

iaink Jun 26th 2008 4:03 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506324)
Let me throw a bit more fuel on the fire (sorry).

Short term: The fact that the price of crude is denominated in US $ and that said $ is down the tubes against a basket of other currencies is more or less being ignored in the discussion of current oil prices.

Good point...

willmore Jun 26th 2008 4:06 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
One might say that the oil companies have us over a barrel........:rofl:

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 4:10 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Steve_P (Post 6506376)
Thank you both. ;)

The answer lies in the fact that it is in the constitution (I believe) that the provinces not the federal government are responsible for their resources.

They are. Whether or not they have the final say on environmental fallout from resource exploitation, which may affect other parts of the country, I do not know.

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 4:29 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Steve_P;
Thank you both. ;)

The answer lies in the fact that it is in the constitution (I believe) that the provinces not the federal government are responsible for their resources.

As I said, I know the history, but it still makes me shake my head in bemusement.

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 4:31 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506462)
As I said, I know the history, but it still makes me shake my head in bemusement.

Why? Is it because you don't believe that people really are greedy short-termists?

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 4:32 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
I read the other day about US mayors putting pressure on Canada about 'dirty oil'.

First thought of course is Pot, Kettle, Black, but then I wondered if the US might actually resent being dependent on and enriching Canadian oil producers even more than it does OPEC producers?

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 4:38 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Souvenir;
Why? Is it because you don't believe that people really are greedy short-termists?

Not really. I think that its because I'm an internationalist at heart.

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 4:41 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Novocastrian (Post 6506485)
Not really. I think that its because I'm an internationalist at heart.

Bleeding-heart pinko.

Souvenir Jun 26th 2008 4:42 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 6506474)
I read the other day about US mayors putting pressure on Canada about 'dirty oil'.

First thought of course is Pot, Kettle, Black, but then I wondered if the US might actually resent being dependent on and enriching Canadian oil producers even more than it does OPEC producers?

Isn't the US military - a big oil consumer - also getting stroppy about dirty oil?

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 4:44 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Souvenir;
Bleeding-heart pinko.

Enough about me. :)

Novocastrian Jun 26th 2008 4:45 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 

Originally Posted by Souvenir;
Isn't the US military - a big oil consumer - also getting stroppy about dirty oil?

There's a considerable lobby in Washington who are very much against it. It is at least a strong possibility that after the Presidential election, the market in the US for oil sands product will dry up.

Jingsamichty Jun 26th 2008 4:46 am

Re: Stupid to the Last Drop
 
Weeeee-eeellll... perhaps Alberta might soon find itself being included in the same Pentagon memos as Iran and North Korea!


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:49 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.