Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
#346
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319











"Disarm" campaign against Liverpool gun and gang culture
Former soldier set up secret gun factories to supply street gangs
Liverpool looks like a good recruiting area for the Army. The gang members will even be able to learn about weapons so they can sell them to gangs after they've left the military.
Quite, the point (that we both make) is which ever angle you 'attack' this from, there IS a counter argument that (most) reasonable people can at least consider even if they dont agree with it 100%.
I (currently) dont hunt, I do however ski. Many people would say that ski 'resorts' and the surrounding infrastructure are destroying the natural beauty and habitats of the mountains.
I drive (as you know) a Jeep Cheroke with a 3.0L Diesel engine. Do I need something that size? (within .5 km of me are two large grocery stores, christ knows how many coffee shops, numerous restaurants, London Drugs, Shoppers Drug Mart, Dominoes, at least three bars...... you get the idea). I could 'survive' without a vehicle at all.
I (currently) dont hunt, I do however ski. Many people would say that ski 'resorts' and the surrounding infrastructure are destroying the natural beauty and habitats of the mountains.
I drive (as you know) a Jeep Cheroke with a 3.0L Diesel engine. Do I need something that size? (within .5 km of me are two large grocery stores, christ knows how many coffee shops, numerous restaurants, London Drugs, Shoppers Drug Mart, Dominoes, at least three bars...... you get the idea). I could 'survive' without a vehicle at all.
If the government doesn't want us to drive vehicles with large engines, they could force manufaturers to restrict the size of their engines, which would then restrict the size of the vehicle. If government seriously wanted to reduce speeding they could force manufacturers to install speed limiters on every new car.
If the Albertan government (or their agents) were to do the culling themselves, this could result in a ban on most hunting along with a possible reduction in stores which supply hunting equipment.
Last edited by DaveLovesDee; Sep 22nd 2009 at 4:53 am.
#347
Consider this situation.
No hunters would require the 'authorities' to employ people to cull animals. The need to employ people would either result in lower unemployment OR greater demand within the current labour market. BOTH cases would result in higher overall spending power (due to increased incomes), the first case would result in lower EI payments allowing the govt to reduce a deficit budget OR increase a credit budget. Higher overall spending would result in increased demand for goods and services, resulting in EITHER further increases in employment (to meet increased demand) or increase in price (to reduce demand and therefore stop demand from outstripping supply).
Increased employment (and therefore wages\salaries) allows the govt to increase Income tax 'take'. Increased prices results in higher GST\PST\HST again going into the Govts coffers.
SO maybe we should stop hunting on purely economic grounds.
No hunters would require the 'authorities' to employ people to cull animals. The need to employ people would either result in lower unemployment OR greater demand within the current labour market. BOTH cases would result in higher overall spending power (due to increased incomes), the first case would result in lower EI payments allowing the govt to reduce a deficit budget OR increase a credit budget. Higher overall spending would result in increased demand for goods and services, resulting in EITHER further increases in employment (to meet increased demand) or increase in price (to reduce demand and therefore stop demand from outstripping supply).
Increased employment (and therefore wages\salaries) allows the govt to increase Income tax 'take'. Increased prices results in higher GST\PST\HST again going into the Govts coffers.
SO maybe we should stop hunting on purely economic grounds.

So maybe we should keep hunting on purely economic grounds

Oops - should have read to end of thread before commenting. MMC made just this point earlier.
Last edited by Oakvillian; Sep 22nd 2009 at 5:39 am. Reason: late to the party
#348
Banned










Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,706
From: In Limbo











However, as these newly employed government cullers are on the public payroll, the government has to put up taxes to pay for them, having simultaneously lost the existing income stream from hunters paying for their tags. The increased tax burden drives businesses away from the jurisdiction and towards a lower-tax regime, resulting in significant job losses in the local economy, further reducing government income in the form of EI and income tax contributions, and further depleting government resources through increased EI payouts.
So maybe we should keep hunting on purely economic grounds
Oops - should have read to end of thread before commenting. MMC made just this point earlier.
So maybe we should keep hunting on purely economic grounds

Oops - should have read to end of thread before commenting. MMC made just this point earlier.
#349
However, as these newly employed government cullers are on the public payroll, the government has to put up taxes to pay for them, having simultaneously lost the existing income stream from hunters paying for their tags. The increased tax burden drives businesses away from the jurisdiction and towards a lower-tax regime, resulting in significant job losses in the local economy, further reducing government income in the form of EI and income tax contributions, and further depleting government resources through increased EI payouts.
So maybe we should keep hunting on purely economic grounds
Oops - should have read to end of thread before commenting. MMC made just this point earlier.
So maybe we should keep hunting on purely economic grounds

Oops - should have read to end of thread before commenting. MMC made just this point earlier.

#350
Realising that the newly formed Govt Culling Team is economically unviable, the federal govt puts the work out to tender. In order to keep costs down the winning bidder culls the animals, selling the meat to various restaurants and fast food outlets, the remaining carcasses are used for various animal by products, the skins are sold and the company makes massive profits and therefore pays ridiculous taxes back to the Govt offsetting any costs incured by the govt 

#351
Account Closed










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,319











Then the meat that is sold cannot be deemed fit for human consumtion as no-one is sure what it ate when it was walking around in the wild, and therefore all the wild deer have to be kept in enclosures so that it can be monitored what they eat, then all the animal liberation jobbies will be up in arms because there are no wild deer anymore.............................. 

#352
and those managed deer will become domesticated and eventually actively farmed, and they'll be stuffed full of growth hormones and kept in feedlots and made to eat corn and pumped with antibiotics and then there'll be a movement to return to "real" grass-fed organic venison as intensive deer farming is bad for the environment and the meat doesn't taste as good as it used to...
#353
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











Then the meat that is sold cannot be deemed fit for human consumtion as no-one is sure what it ate when it was walking around in the wild, and therefore all the wild deer have to be kept in enclosures so that it can be monitored what they eat, then all the animal liberation jobbies will be up in arms because there are no wild deer anymore.............................. 

Healthy deer ; green tag and off to the food inspectors
Weak sick deer; red tag and to the dog food factory
#354
Why is "government controlled" morally better than individually hunted?
#356
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











You can train the government hunter to a high level in a multitude of areas and skill sets, higher than your average hunter will get to voluntarily , get clean kill rates above average hunters, ensure that the process is more controlled, it’s possible to get clean audit trail on the beast concerned to achieve a higher level of confidence in the consumeability of the meat
Investment in techniques and technology to maximize the return in investment can be achieved due to the higher purchasing power of regional government as opposed to the single hunter
This could lead to tagging of herds to ensure that the cull can be statistically analyzed and linked to meat data ensuring future improvements to the process
A controlled route to market can be made that would allow a greater distribution of the meat ensuring maximum price (ship to higher priced city markets, designer restaurants)
Stuff the morals, bring on the Dollar
#357










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











Not morally better
You can train the government hunter to a high level in a multitude of areas and skill sets, higher than your average hunter will get to voluntarily , get clean kill rates above average hunters, ensure that the process is more controlled, it’s possible to get clean audit trail on the beast concerned to achieve a higher level of confidence in the consumeability of the meat
Investment in techniques and technology to maximize the return in investment can be achieved due to the higher purchasing power of regional government as opposed to the single hunter
This could lead to tagging of herds to ensure that the cull can be statistically analyzed and linked to meat data ensuring future improvements to the process
A controlled route to market can be made that would allow a greater distribution of the meat ensuring maximum price (ship to higher priced city markets, designer restaurants)
Stuff the morals, bring on the Dollar
You can train the government hunter to a high level in a multitude of areas and skill sets, higher than your average hunter will get to voluntarily , get clean kill rates above average hunters, ensure that the process is more controlled, it’s possible to get clean audit trail on the beast concerned to achieve a higher level of confidence in the consumeability of the meat
Investment in techniques and technology to maximize the return in investment can be achieved due to the higher purchasing power of regional government as opposed to the single hunter
This could lead to tagging of herds to ensure that the cull can be statistically analyzed and linked to meat data ensuring future improvements to the process
A controlled route to market can be made that would allow a greater distribution of the meat ensuring maximum price (ship to higher priced city markets, designer restaurants)
Stuff the morals, bring on the Dollar
#359










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











Dunno - not a hunter. Hope you're right though, it makes the most sense.
Edit to add: Am late into this debate. Have to confess to not having read it all...
Edit to add: Am late into this debate. Have to confess to not having read it all...
Last edited by Alan2005; Sep 22nd 2009 at 8:38 am.
#360
Not morally better
You can train the government hunter to a high level in a multitude of areas and skill sets, higher than your average hunter will get to voluntarily , get clean kill rates above average hunters, ensure that the process is more controlled, it’s possible to get clean audit trail on the beast concerned to achieve a higher level of confidence in the consumeability of the meat
Investment in techniques and technology to maximize the return in investment can be achieved due to the higher purchasing power of regional government as opposed to the single hunter
This could lead to tagging of herds to ensure that the cull can be statistically analyzed and linked to meat data ensuring future improvements to the process
A controlled route to market can be made that would allow a greater distribution of the meat ensuring maximum price (ship to higher priced city markets, designer restaurants)
Stuff the morals, bring on the Dollar
You can train the government hunter to a high level in a multitude of areas and skill sets, higher than your average hunter will get to voluntarily , get clean kill rates above average hunters, ensure that the process is more controlled, it’s possible to get clean audit trail on the beast concerned to achieve a higher level of confidence in the consumeability of the meat
Investment in techniques and technology to maximize the return in investment can be achieved due to the higher purchasing power of regional government as opposed to the single hunter
This could lead to tagging of herds to ensure that the cull can be statistically analyzed and linked to meat data ensuring future improvements to the process
A controlled route to market can be made that would allow a greater distribution of the meat ensuring maximum price (ship to higher priced city markets, designer restaurants)
Stuff the morals, bring on the Dollar

Let's see - how did the professional British army do against the "amateur" Boers, or the professional US army do against the "amateurs" in Vietnam?
Hunting is more akin to guerilla warfare than trench warfare. The amateurs do just fine! They are highly motivated to improve their skills!
Tag all the deer? Dear me!
They need to be wild, not farmed!Who is going to pay for all this? It works "as is" with the "amateurs" doing it for free, and not even for free - they pay!



