Something that will no doubt spark controversy....
#136
Fledermaus - I try my best but am not a right wing militant veggie - I went veggie as I didnt like meat and then continued from there.
re the calcium etc. . . when I was pregnant the drs tried to force me onto iron tabs asuming I was anaemic as I was veggie- I refused until my bloods proved it- they never did~ !
re the calcium etc. . . when I was pregnant the drs tried to force me onto iron tabs asuming I was anaemic as I was veggie- I refused until my bloods proved it- they never did~ !
#137
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710











Gryph
#138
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,284

Fledermaus - I try my best but am not a right wing militant veggie - I went veggie as I didnt like meat and then continued from there.
re the calcium etc. . . when I was pregnant the drs tried to force me onto iron tabs asuming I was anaemic as I was veggie- I refused until my bloods proved it- they never did~ !
re the calcium etc. . . when I was pregnant the drs tried to force me onto iron tabs asuming I was anaemic as I was veggie- I refused until my bloods proved it- they never did~ !
I understand what you mean about not liking meat, the texture used to do it for me. I still won't eat seafood, clams, mussels etc. that just grosses me out!
#139
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,284

MMC can you explain when you can and can't take the head or antlers as a trophy? I was at someone's house for dinner, a moose he had shot, and when we asked where the antlers were he said that you aren't allowed to keep them?? Is is that you pay more to be able to keep a trophy? What about the bear/beaver/fox furs? What happens then?? Any ideas?
#140
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











You missed the point. You don't jump because the landing is the best part, otherwise you would jump off the roof of your house. My point with the "social" part of the the hunt is the get together and the beverages and venturing into the wilderness with friends. But if you insist yes hunting has a very very very long social and cultural tie with humanity that has lasted for tens of thousands of years and across every culture on earth and the end result is the death of an animal, quite like farming. I think complaining about the death of a non endangered wild animal is illogical and hypocritical. Think about that the next time you are paying to enjoy a meal at a restaurant. Live and let live 

The reality is they are lying to themselves and others about their primitive blood lust
I think they all do know why they do it, just that they don’t like the reality of it being bandied around as it makes them appear to be a little lower on the social evolutionary scale to their counterparts
Last edited by MikeUK; Jul 8th 2009 at 3:06 am.
#141
My issue is with the hunter coming up with hundreds of reasons why its everything but the kill that they do it for, when if that was true there are many better ways of achieving that aim
The reality is they are lying to themselves and others about their primitive blood lust
I think they all do know why they do it, just that they don’t like the reality of it being bandied around as it makes them appear to be a little lower on the social evolutionary scale to their counterparts
The reality is they are lying to themselves and others about their primitive blood lust
I think they all do know why they do it, just that they don’t like the reality of it being bandied around as it makes them appear to be a little lower on the social evolutionary scale to their counterparts
A good day's hunting is absolutely not all about the kill. Sure, there is some primaeval instinct to do with provision of food which you are obviously sophisticated enough to have suppressed in yourself, but - as has been discussed endlessly here - the provision of food is not the primary purpose of a hunt in Western civilisations. Supermarkets can fulfil that need much more simply.
#142
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











Mike, you're missing one fundamental point to reinforce the social-bonding aspect of hunting. If it were all about the kill, then a day's hunting that didn't result in a kill would be a failure, and cause for disappointment. How is it, then, that a group of buddies can go out into the boondocks on a hunting expedition and have a great time despite never getting a whiff of their prey?
A good day's hunting is absolutely not all about the kill. Sure, there is some primaeval instinct to do with provision of food which you are obviously sophisticated enough to have suppressed in yourself, but - as has been discussed endlessly here - the provision of food is not the primary purpose of a hunt in Western civilisations. Supermarkets can fulfil that need much more simply.
A good day's hunting is absolutely not all about the kill. Sure, there is some primaeval instinct to do with provision of food which you are obviously sophisticated enough to have suppressed in yourself, but - as has been discussed endlessly here - the provision of food is not the primary purpose of a hunt in Western civilisations. Supermarkets can fulfil that need much more simply.
The key bond being the desire for a kill, the fact that a day can go past without meeting the desire in no way break the group bond because it likely they be able to meet that requirement next time
A day’s hunting may not be all about the kill, but being a hunter is about the Kill
An analogy
I sometimes go paragliding and the day is blown out, but I often have a good time talking with colleagues about other more successful days or social things the day isn’t disappointing because it’s expected that some days just won’t work out…. But my primary reason is the flying otherwise I just wouldn’t be there
#143
I'm not sure about the interior decor aspect of this either. Eeek
MMC can you explain when you can and can't take the head or antlers as a trophy? I was at someone's house for dinner, a moose he had shot, and when we asked where the antlers were he said that you aren't allowed to keep them?? Is is that you pay more to be able to keep a trophy? What about the bear/beaver/fox furs? What happens then?? Any ideas?
MMC can you explain when you can and can't take the head or antlers as a trophy? I was at someone's house for dinner, a moose he had shot, and when we asked where the antlers were he said that you aren't allowed to keep them?? Is is that you pay more to be able to keep a trophy? What about the bear/beaver/fox furs? What happens then?? Any ideas?
When you see antlers displayed they are either as a result of collecting sheds in late winter or because the cost of mounting a head is more so they don't.
I know basically anything that is in our house if you kill it you keep it, it is up to you whether or not you get it mounted.
Most people who shoot a bear will get it full body mounted or make it into a rug (this can cost thousands and takes around 2 years to get done).
You can have the furs made into whatever you want - completely down to personal choice, or full or partial body mounted.
Hang on though am at work at the mo will just go talk to some of the guys out back to see what the issue is with the horns, antlers of the moose
#144
Hey Fled just checked and the general concensus is that the guy is pulling your leg.
There are no stipulations as to not keeping the horns, you wouldn't shoot a trophy bull moose and mount it without its rack! So if there are no signs of antlers at all its probably a female, if there are little stubs then its just a baby not something that should have been shot.
On that note it may well have been the first moose he shot with a bow or something - so could well be a cow and therefore as his first would be something he would want to keep as a trophy!
There are no stipulations as to not keeping the horns, you wouldn't shoot a trophy bull moose and mount it without its rack! So if there are no signs of antlers at all its probably a female, if there are little stubs then its just a baby not something that should have been shot.
On that note it may well have been the first moose he shot with a bow or something - so could well be a cow and therefore as his first would be something he would want to keep as a trophy!
#145
Account Closed










Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,284

Hey Fled just checked and the general concensus is that the guy is pulling your leg.
There are no stipulations as to not keeping the horns, you wouldn't shoot a trophy bull moose and mount it without its rack! So if there are no signs of antlers at all its probably a female, if there are little stubs then its just a baby not something that should have been shot.
On that note it may well have been the first moose he shot with a bow or something - so could well be a cow and therefore as his first would be something he would want to keep as a trophy!
There are no stipulations as to not keeping the horns, you wouldn't shoot a trophy bull moose and mount it without its rack! So if there are no signs of antlers at all its probably a female, if there are little stubs then its just a baby not something that should have been shot.
On that note it may well have been the first moose he shot with a bow or something - so could well be a cow and therefore as his first would be something he would want to keep as a trophy!
#146
I disagree I believe that the social bonding aspect of hunting is more about likeminded individuals being together
The key bond being the desire for a kill, the fact that a day can go past without meeting the desire in no way break the group bond because it likely they be able to meet that requirement next time
A day’s hunting may not be all about the kill, but being a hunter is about the Kill
An analogy
I sometimes go paragliding and the day is blown out, but I often have a good time talking with colleagues about other more successful days or social things the day isn’t disappointing because it’s expected that some days just won’t work out…. But my primary reason is the flying otherwise I just wouldn’t be there
The key bond being the desire for a kill, the fact that a day can go past without meeting the desire in no way break the group bond because it likely they be able to meet that requirement next time
A day’s hunting may not be all about the kill, but being a hunter is about the Kill
An analogy
I sometimes go paragliding and the day is blown out, but I often have a good time talking with colleagues about other more successful days or social things the day isn’t disappointing because it’s expected that some days just won’t work out…. But my primary reason is the flying otherwise I just wouldn’t be there
Can I just say that some hunts last for a good 10 days, so if you are out after something particularly hard to get, then there is every likelihood you will come back with nothing.
A very good friend of mine shot nothing last year but had an awesome time with the guys even so.
#147
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











Can I just say that some hunts last for a good 10 days, so if you are out after something particularly hard to get, then there is every likelihood you will come back with nothing.
A very good friend of mine shot nothing last year but had an awesome time with the guys even so.
A very good friend of mine shot nothing last year but had an awesome time with the guys even so.
Your comment in no way surprises me, the harder it is to achieve your goal the less likely you will be disappointed with failure..
None of these thoughts conflicts with my rational, people hunt because they enjoy killing
The fact they feel better when doing this in a group environment is easy to understand
The fact that they can get more pleasure from going for the more complex and difficult animals and that here is pleasure in the process and build up isn’t a surprise, but in the end the process is completed with a kill, it could have been a photograph, but it isn’t, the desired end result is a dead animal
Last edited by MikeUK; Jul 8th 2009 at 4:38 am.
#148
He's been hunting all his life, so not the first he had killed. The family have a barn set up where they skin and butcher the animals they have killed. I doubt that he was pulling our legs either. All I could think of was that you may have to pay more to keep a trophy and as they hunt for food then they hadn't paid that money. This was in Northern Ontario, maybe different regs?
The tag is attached to the animal when you have shot it and its yours to do whatever you want with, be it eating or mounting.




