Originally Posted by bats

The carbuncle was a proposed modern style extension to the National Gallery. Presumably he would also classify the pyramid at the Louvre and and the ROM as carbuncles.

Originally Posted by dbd33

One certainly hopes so. It was quite an achievement to build arguably the ugliest stucture in Toronto, such competition, such a carbunkular effort.

Originally Posted by Zen10

Your post clearly implied that there was a positive side to his veto, which is undemocratic intervention in the legislature. And furthermore you reiterate this position here:



And here:






While the principle is all that matters, we're talking about more then "buildings" although the details are only emerging. Finally, David Cameron most certainly was elected, by the voters of the Witney Consituency, and overwhelmingly as well. The fact remains, simple and glaring: a member of a private dynasty should not have a veto over parliamentary legislation. never mind public subsidies like his 60k one night in Jersey etc.

Originally Posted by Jetlag

Ah, I see where this is going. This is not about reading what I said, it's about reading INTO what I said that which will really piss you off despite whether it's true or not. Fair enough. Not my sort of convo.