|
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by Siouxie
(Post 12789390)
Nobody's busines PROVIDED they pay their own way and don't rely on HRH to pay nor Canadian or UK taxpayers. They want to be financially independent - then do so, stop taking hand outs and expecting everyone else to pay. :D If they had to rely on their personal income only, I wonder how long it would last? He has a few million from parents, no doubt..
:) |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12789436)
Just watch the next broadcast of CBC National News...it's their top story.
|
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12789570)
It seems to me that ol' Meghan wants her cake and eat it.....sorry Meghan this is not Hollywood it doesn't work that way. You knew what you signed up for.....there is a bit more to it than the fairy tale of marrying a prince.
|
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
An advantage if they move to BC is they won't be so easily hounded by paparazzi as the Safe Streets Act makes it illegal here.
Safe Streets Act I believe some other provinces have similar laws. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12789596)
The word you're groping for is "uppity".
|
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12789596)
The word you're groping for is "uppity".
Not that I've got any time for the royals, just even less for the Piers Morgan-style press. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12789651)
Read this for an idea of why Markle might find the UK press a little "hostile".
Not that I've got any time for the royals, just even less for the Piers Morgan-style press. If they didn't exist, I wouldn't invent the royal family, but none of us chooses our circumstances and I have some sympathy for theirs. I've no clue how one could step into that household and appear to be low maintenance. The little I read of her, Ms. Markle seems to be doing passably well at a impossible act. Shame in a way that Prince Harry didn't marry someone properly unsuitable like Gwyneth Paltrow or Lizzo - give the press something to really be apocalyptic about. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy
(Post 12789600)
An advantage if they move to BC is they won't be so easily hounded by paparazzi as the Safe Streets Act makes it illegal here.
Safe Streets Act I believe some other provinces have similar laws. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by Rete
(Post 12789160)
Well Mama has given Harry and Meghan permission to split their year between Canada and the UK. We in the US are thankful they have not chosen the US to call home.
Can Brits live in Canada for six months? What about Americans? I know that Canadians can live in the US for six months (live, not work) but not sure if it is the same the other way around. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by christmasoompa
(Post 12789199)
My guess is that Meghan probably still has PR, she lived in Canada until a couple of years ago. If so, sponsoring Harry will be easy.
If memory serves actors and those in the film industry easily obtain work permits. https://www.immigration.ca/performin...rmit-in-canada |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12789570)
It seems to me that ol' Meghan wants her cake and eat it.....sorry Meghan this is not Hollywood it doesn't work that way. You knew what you signed up for.....there is a bit more to it than the fairy tale of marrying a prince.
Selling "Sussex Royal" branded stuff seems unbelievably tacky. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by cxx
(Post 12789680)
Totally agree. She / they seem to want to keep all of the privileges of being royal, whilst supposedly being financially independent. If they want to be independent, how can they expect others to fund their security? Surely the best thing is for her to go back to acting and support him, and he can do charity stuff as an individual, not a royal.
Selling "Sussex Royal" branded stuff seems unbelievably tacky. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12789665)
Sarah Vine is even worse than Piers Morgan, a foul person. The avocado headlines gave me a laugh, thanks for that.
If they didn't exist, I wouldn't invent the royal family, but none of us chooses our circumstances and I have some sympathy for theirs. I've no clue how one could step into that household and appear to be low maintenance. The little I read of her, Ms. Markle seems to be doing passably well at a impossible act. Shame in a way that Prince Harry didn't marry someone properly unsuitable like Gwyneth Paltrow or Lizzo - give the press something to really be apocalyptic about. On a lighter note....Harry and Lizzo :rofl::rofl: now thats hilarious!! thats made me laugh. |
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Any time I wonder why ordinary people vote Conservative.... and yet, these creatures do exist,by the millions....
|
Re: Prince Harry and Meghan ......
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12789743)
Any time I wonder why ordinary people vote Conservative.... and yet, these creatures do exist,by the millions....
Do you wonder an lot then? .....you say that as though its some kind of crime? you're not making assumptions on people again are you? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:09 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.