They do seem very Foxish.

She knew exactly what she was getting into IMO...in fact I firmly believe the ‘blind date’ only existed for Haz. I think, judging by the comments she made during the engagement interview, she arrogantly thought she could waltz in and change the RF’s system.

Can you recall any of the comments ?

I think she assumed that she was getting in to the British version of celebrity, and didn't realise that there was an obligation of public service.

Please, please don’t make me listen to the interview again.

But it must have been difficult for her, coming from the USA, expecting full equality, and finding out that she has to play second fiddle to the unremarkable Kate ? Not just on one occasion, but for life. I can certainly see why she had a change of heart. The RF is literally and historically (!) antithetical to the American psyche.

Agreed Siouxie, 40 is no longer young... I remember being really depressed when I turned 40! lol and no one can serioulsy claim to be naive at that age, unless you have lived a very sheltered life, and im afraid ol' Meg doesnt fall into that category at all.

However ignorant, shallow and narcissistic are what she is..... she has demonstrated her ignorance combined with and her dismissive attitude for the Queen and royal protocol She expected even more than a royal title (and of course non of the royal duty). The fact she got the younger brothers wife with no standing deal has no doubt greatly annoyed her. So as a result now she is on a poor me whingefest and has the audacity to play the race card! Thats a pretty low thing to do....and the Americans have swallowed it hook line and sinker!

Surely she's on solid ground in thinking the aged inbreeds treated her differently because she's Black. It might have been worse if she was Irish, or a dog, but it's very unlikely that the family failed to notice.

As are all your posts in this thread Paul.

The 2 are nothing similar. A so called 'celebrity' can opt out at any time they want to (and often are caste aside ... DYSWIDT) - they are only as good as their social media standing! ..... Meanwhile a royal is a royal for life.. and Yes, they perform a duty to the Queen, the country etc.

Clearly you don't believe in royalism.

That's utter rubbish. Plenty can be achieved after 40. 40 is middle age, but it's also the prime of life, enough experience to help the brain while the body can still do the stuff you want it to.

It certainly is.

I don't. The point of it is lost on me. I wouldn't campaign to abolish it but it's as relevant to me as ice hockey or the flat earth society. If y'all want to trash someone why not a deserving candidate, Katie Hopkins, for example.

Well you have rubber stamped her pure ignorance, not the mention the rest of her wonderful traits.

Aged inbreeds? you just said 40 was young!! Prince William is only 39,, and its said he is the one that is most incensed about all of this....as I am sure he feels his younger brother has been hi jacked by this charlatan

The point of royalty is lost and not relevant to you and yet you continue to post your opinions in this thread against them.. so you must have some interest, LOL.

Not all of the comments are trashing anyone... and yet you continue to trash the Royal family... a touch of hypocracy there, perhaps....

Some interest, sure. As with Billie Eilish's hair colour the royal family are a matter of passing interest.