Prince Andrew
#31
Re: Prince Andrew
That is reductio ad absurdum, AC, and you know it.
There is a colossal imbalance in the power and influence of the "woman" and the "man". "The woman" was actually a 17-year old girl who was an occasional paid plaything of a then-notorious (and since convicted) sexual predator. "The man" is a privileged and protected playboy, seemingly without the brains to realise that going on TV with a laughable "explanation" was going to do the exact opposite of draw a line under this story.
It's not strange times we live in; they were strange times when this sort of behaviour was considered par for the course, just what people of that set do.
Andrew and the royals have had a damned easy pass in life. It's about time they were genuinely held to account for their behaviour. Their privilege only comes from our willingness to give it, so they should be held to account by us.
There is a colossal imbalance in the power and influence of the "woman" and the "man". "The woman" was actually a 17-year old girl who was an occasional paid plaything of a then-notorious (and since convicted) sexual predator. "The man" is a privileged and protected playboy, seemingly without the brains to realise that going on TV with a laughable "explanation" was going to do the exact opposite of draw a line under this story.
It's not strange times we live in; they were strange times when this sort of behaviour was considered par for the course, just what people of that set do.
Andrew and the royals have had a damned easy pass in life. It's about time they were genuinely held to account for their behaviour. Their privilege only comes from our willingness to give it, so they should be held to account by us.
She has made comments that he suggests (I don't know where he was or if he has/had the medical condition he suggests renders her accusations questionable) mean that her version of events could not have happened. I am not defending him as I have no idea what happened and, if it did happen, I would be happy to pull the trigger.
#32
Re: Prince Andrew
None of that deals with the facts.
She has made comments that he suggests (I don't know where he was or if he has/had the medical condition he suggests renders her accusations questionable) mean that her version of events could not have happened. I am not defending him as I have no idea what happened and, if it did happen, I would be happy to pull the trigger.
She has made comments that he suggests (I don't know where he was or if he has/had the medical condition he suggests renders her accusations questionable) mean that her version of events could not have happened. I am not defending him as I have no idea what happened and, if it did happen, I would be happy to pull the trigger.
Why is that strange? Most people, and I'm sure as a lawyer you've seen more examples than most, tend to not believe outlandish defences to plausible allegations. What is strange about that?
A woman makes an allegation and, from what I have seen, gives lots of details about what she alleges happened. Man responds stating that the allegations could not be correct (his location and his medical condition) and people on the internet know what happened, believing that he is the one lying. Strange times we live in.
#33
Re: Prince Andrew
Epstein.
A man who knew too much for his own good.
Looks like a couple of patseys are lined up to take the fall...
Andrew and others would have breathed a big sigh, convenient wasn't it?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...in/4082679002/
A man who knew too much for his own good.
Looks like a couple of patseys are lined up to take the fall...
Andrew and others would have breathed a big sigh, convenient wasn't it?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...in/4082679002/
#34
Re: Prince Andrew
Epstein.
A man who knew too much for his own good.
Looks like a couple of patseys are lined up to take the fall...
Andrew and others would have breathed a big sigh, convenient wasn't it?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...in/4082679002/
A man who knew too much for his own good.
Looks like a couple of patseys are lined up to take the fall...
Andrew and others would have breathed a big sigh, convenient wasn't it?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...in/4082679002/
#35
Re: Prince Andrew
It might be if the 'suicide' wasn't actually suicide, whhich is what many people have said, given the connections of many of the people in Epsteins Black Books, I suspect there would be a lot of them not wanting him to give evidence, and with the wherewithal to do something about it.
#36
Re: Prince Andrew
If they can pin sleeping on duty on civilian guards who'd worked double shifts instead of members of the corrections officers' union they'll have less opposition.
#37
Re: Prince Andrew
I went and re-read your post that I replied to. Indeed, you have set out the "facts", as we are meant to understand them... Woman makes allegations. Man makes defence, on TV. People generally appear to disbelieve the man. All this is fine. Then we get to your last sentence, "Strange times we live in."
Why is that strange? Most people, and I'm sure as a lawyer you've seen more examples than most, tend to not believe outlandish defences to plausible allegations. What is strange about that?
Why is that strange? Most people, and I'm sure as a lawyer you've seen more examples than most, tend to not believe outlandish defences to plausible allegations. What is strange about that?
I get it, you believe he raped her. At this time, based upon what I have read, I don't
#38
Re: Prince Andrew
It might be if the 'suicide' wasn't actually suicide, whhich is what many people have said, given the connections of many of the people in Epsteins Black Books, I suspect there would be a lot of them not wanting him to give evidence, and with the wherewithal to do something about it.
It seems beyond belief that he had access to a ligament to hang himself while the two jail guards slept at the SAME time.
This sounds like an MI6 job.
Last edited by Danny B; Nov 19th 2019 at 4:51 pm.
#39
Re: Prince Andrew
We know, from the famous picture, that he had inappropriate physical contact with her so it's just a matter of how far we think that likely to have gone. If we believe the rest of her story, that she was obliged to have sex with friends of Epstein and Maxwell, then her story is, I think, more plausible than his. Do you not believe any of what she has to say or do you think that, despite his being English, Prince Andrew is an innocent, cuddly, kind of a guy?
#40
Banned
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 19,879
Re: Prince Andrew
Age of consent - consensual sex... not necessarily rape or 'underage sex'.
#42
Re: Prince Andrew
We know, from the famous picture, that he had inappropriate physical contact with her so it's just a matter of how far we think that likely to have gone. If we believe the rest of her story, that she was obliged to have sex with friends of Epstein and Maxwell, then her story is, I think, more plausible than his. Do you not believe any of what she has to say or do you think that, despite his being English, Prince Andrew is an innocent, cuddly, kind of a guy?
Having had to deal with a number of the members of the royal family in the past, I have no particular liking of any of them.
I am unable to describe anyone that I have ever met as an innocent, cuddly, kind of guy and, having never met him, I would not use those words to describe him either.
I have to admit that I had heard her say anything and I have only read what the BBC has written about this and, from what I have read, I prefer his version of events to hers, primarily on the "sweating" issue.
#43
Re: Prince Andrew
Why do you think he stayed with Epstein and Maxwell if not for their exceptional hospitality?
#45
Re: Prince Andrew
https://www.insider.com/epstein-accu...festyle-2019-8
It appears beyond doubt that Prince Andrew was a regular visitor to Epstein who was well-known for hosting sex parties with girls like Giuffre on the menu. Prince Andrew was photographed with Giuffre at Maxwell's house. It is a matter of fact that Epstein admitted to, and was convicted of, procuring underage girls for prostitution.
How many people do you know who are notorious procurers of underage girls for prostitution? I'm sure it's none, but if you did know one, would you go to his house and cuddle young girls? Would you go to his house for 4 days after he came out of jail for procuring underage girls for prostitution?
You are, of course, perfectly entitled to believe Prince Andrew did no wrong. But we are entitled to question your judgement of what is proper, or right, or legal, based on your stated opinions. For what it's worth, I think you are being deliberately obstructive just for reasons of BE sport. I don't actually think that you, as a parent to young women, believe that Prince Andrew's behaviour is anything other than abhorrent and obscenely entitled.