Post The Latest Picture You Have Taken
#691










Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830











Ronnie Yip here, checking in from Toronto.
Thanks for posting my photos, and calling them "cooked" after getting caught with your pants down.
I guess the following pics were also posted tongue-in-cheek:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/neilta/...in/photostream
You even took his title.
http://forums.redflagdeals.com/post-.../#post13310428
Looks like you are an avid peruser of this thread in Red Flag Deals:
http://forums.redflagdeals.com/post-...-taken-726885/
Seems that you were such a big fan that you decided to start a similar concept here.
I don't mind people reposting my photos, but a credit would be nice. I was going to let this slide until your lame "a tongue-in-cheek dig" defense came up.
Thanks for posting my photos, and calling them "cooked" after getting caught with your pants down.
I guess the following pics were also posted tongue-in-cheek:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/neilta/...in/photostream
You even took his title.
http://forums.redflagdeals.com/post-.../#post13310428
Looks like you are an avid peruser of this thread in Red Flag Deals:
http://forums.redflagdeals.com/post-...-taken-726885/
Seems that you were such a big fan that you decided to start a similar concept here.
I don't mind people reposting my photos, but a credit would be nice. I was going to let this slide until your lame "a tongue-in-cheek dig" defense came up.
How'd you twig onto this forum and the images?
Last edited by Aviator; Sep 21st 2011 at 2:42 am.
#692
The pictures you posted were not all 'cooked' as you put it, some were candid portraits.
Not sure how long you have been doing photography, Nothing wrong with post processing. If you shoot RAW, you have to post process as RAW is an unprocessed image. Just a new slant on dark room techniques. JPG is lossy format and don't give the quality image you would get from RAW or the latitude for exposure adjustment and Canon don't save as TIFF. It is hard to get a perfect image straight out of a DSLR due to the limited dynamic range sensitivity of sensors at present. I may get one or two, but not many in a high range scene. Even with full frame and 21mp sensor, colour saturation is good, but it still struggles with dynamic range on occasion and requires some adjustment.
With positives (slides) we used to sandwich, negatives and Cibachrome would be dodged and burned, cropped and all sorts of other techniques. The purpose, to make a pleasing image, for the photographer or client. We all have different ideas of what makes a good image, some look natural some don't.
In a previous post you said you use Photomatix, yet you don't like 'cooked' images, Photmatix is HDR software, to 'cook' images. This is post processing.
There are some inconsistencies and backtracking here me thinks.
Also read rule 7 about posting copyrighted material. You may also want to become familiar with copyright laws and photography. Just because it is on the Internet or no copyright assertion is made (which it was in this instance I believe) does not make it fair game.
Not sure how long you have been doing photography, Nothing wrong with post processing. If you shoot RAW, you have to post process as RAW is an unprocessed image. Just a new slant on dark room techniques. JPG is lossy format and don't give the quality image you would get from RAW or the latitude for exposure adjustment and Canon don't save as TIFF. It is hard to get a perfect image straight out of a DSLR due to the limited dynamic range sensitivity of sensors at present. I may get one or two, but not many in a high range scene. Even with full frame and 21mp sensor, colour saturation is good, but it still struggles with dynamic range on occasion and requires some adjustment.
With positives (slides) we used to sandwich, negatives and Cibachrome would be dodged and burned, cropped and all sorts of other techniques. The purpose, to make a pleasing image, for the photographer or client. We all have different ideas of what makes a good image, some look natural some don't.
In a previous post you said you use Photomatix, yet you don't like 'cooked' images, Photmatix is HDR software, to 'cook' images. This is post processing.
There are some inconsistencies and backtracking here me thinks.
Also read rule 7 about posting copyrighted material. You may also want to become familiar with copyright laws and photography. Just because it is on the Internet or no copyright assertion is made (which it was in this instance I believe) does not make it fair game.
#693
Flickr offers stats that include where people viewing your pics are coming from...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12691530@N04/stats/
photobucket also offers that
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12691530@N04/stats/
photobucket also offers that
Last edited by iaink; Sep 21st 2011 at 2:52 am.
#694
Any chance we can just stick to the thread title, and take chatter to the other threads?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...e/IMG_0624.jpg
<etc>
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...e/IMG_0624.jpg
<etc>
#695
Just Joined
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2








You take great photos... how do you choose your subjects? Just random strangers?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ronnieyip/
The urban decay ones are fab too.
As for ultrarunner, more questions than answers there....
I dont get why anyone would do that, sorry...
I can delete the posts if you want me to, let me know.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ronnieyip/
The urban decay ones are fab too.

As for ultrarunner, more questions than answers there....
I dont get why anyone would do that, sorry...I can delete the posts if you want me to, let me know.
I don't mind you keeping the photos intact, again I don't mind the reposting.

up is down. by ronnie.yip, on Flickr
Flickr offers stats that include where people viewing your pics are coming from...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12691530@N04/stats/
photobucket also offers that
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12691530@N04/stats/
photobucket also offers that
#696










Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830











http://forums.redflagdeals.com/photo...elcome-980348/
#697
The word that springs to mind with respect to our athletic type is: "Busted!
#698
Picture taken by me. Post processing courtesy of Steve P.
#699










Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830











Thanks! Street photography takes a lot of time and patience. Most of the "shooting" is in fact just standing around, observing, and waiting for something or someone who is interesting enough.
I don't mind you keeping the photos intact, again I don't mind the reposting.
Thanks, a posted a hello message here:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6170/...e0292630_b.jpg
up is down. by ronnie.yip, on Flickr
Yep, I got here via the flickr stats.
I don't mind you keeping the photos intact, again I don't mind the reposting.
Thanks, a posted a hello message here:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6170/...e0292630_b.jpg
up is down. by ronnie.yip, on Flickr
Yep, I got here via the flickr stats.
Nice shot.
#701
What the December 2009 bit you mean? Of perhaps the permanently banned poster?
http://forums.redflagdeals.com/photo...elcome-980348/
http://forums.redflagdeals.com/photo...elcome-980348/






I do think IMG_0032b looks just that bit better though. 