![]() |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12442827)
California closer than Barrie? I think not.
|
Re: Patrick Brown
Seems Mr Brown is suing CTV for defamation etc, in that they set him up. If that's the case, good luck to him. No need to ask where CTV are on the left/right of centre politics...;)
|
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by macadian
(Post 12442931)
Seems Mr Brown is suing CTV for defamation etc, in that they set him up. If that's the case, good luck to him. No need to ask where CTV are on the left/right of centre politics...;)
|
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by macadian
(Post 12442931)
Seems Mr Brown is suing CTV for defamation etc, in that they set him up. If that's the case, good luck to him. No need to ask where CTV are on the left/right of centre politics...;)
Or maybe Canada's centre is so far to the right that left of centre is still on the right. :lol: |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12442972)
These things are relative but I really can't imagine any big organisation on the left. Just like politicians, it's all Right and not quite as much Right.
Or maybe Canada's centre is so far to the right that left of centre is still on the right. :lol: |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by macadian
(Post 12442986)
Sorry, disagree. Frustrating thing about living in Canada for some years nogvw is the embarrassingly Liberal bias of both CTV and CBC.....
|
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12442992)
It all depends on where you start.
|
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by macadian
(Post 12442986)
Frustrating thing about living in Canada for some years now is the embarrassingly Liberal bias of both CTV and CBC.....
But how does that make Canada's Liberals left wing? |
Re: Patrick Brown
https://thewalrus.ca/what-kind-of-leader-is-patrick-brown/#.WoZGUVOZSG8.twittery
This is worth a read. if you don't have time just go to the last para. |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12443286)
This is worth a read. if you don't have time just go to the last para.
What if Brown had come forward to defend himself by saying something like: “I don’t believe that I engaged in any sexual misconduct, but I was also this young lady’s boss, there was an age difference between us, and with the benefit of maturity and hindsight, I can see that it was inappropriate for us to be partying together in that environment. I’m sorry if I made her feel uncomfortable, and I hope we can both move on.†But on reading it I was immediately reminded of Kevin Spacey's initial statement. It is important to remember that Spacey's apology was before subsequent allegations. At the time, it was seen as a one-off, nothing more. I remember reading it to my stepdaughter and we both thought it was heartfelt and genuine. Yet before any other accusations surfaced, he was roundly condemned for it. So I'm not so sure the suggested statement for Brown would have "worked" in the way suggested. Not in the current climate. |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12443301)
Yes, I read it. She makes many excellent points. There's just one quibble I have.
The implication is that this would have been okay and he'd have survived. But on reading it I was immediately reminded of Kevin Spacey's initial statement. It is important to remember that Spacey's apology was before subsequent allegations. At the time, it was seen as a one-off, nothing more. I remember reading it to my stepdaughter and we both thought it was heartfelt and genuine. Yet before any other accusations surfaced, he was roundly condemned for it. So I'm not so sure the suggested statement for Brown would have "worked" in the way suggested. Not in the current climate. He said he resigned then he says he didn't. Somebody else sent the letter for him. He says he didn't have that apartment in 2006 but that's the year he moved into it. Can't wait to see what happens next. |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12443626)
He might have survived this with a bit of honesty yes. With every action he's coming over as a very unpleasant person...said he resigned then he says he didn't...says he didn't have that apartment in 2006 but that's the year he moved into it...
It's what I was talking about in that other thread previously. No matter what the allegation is, no matter whether in isolation or multiple examples, or whether it could be substantiated, everyone is guilty and all guilty to the same level. So if he'd come out with that statement first thing, I don't think it would have worked currently. |
Re: Patrick Brown
I think Patrick Brown's difficulty - aside from the obvious one that he appears to be at best a creep and at worst a serially offensive abuser of his power-relationships with women - is that he is an odious and oleaginous toad who nobody in their right mind would want leading the province. And that the Conservative party saw this and were only too delighted to use the sexual misconduct allegations to drop him like a stone.
I find the whole leadership election thing now strangely fascinating. Tanya Granic Allen (who she?) is trying for Hudak/Brown redux. Mulroney, Elliott and Ford are all trading off the reputation of their more famous family member (father, husband and brother respectively) without having any substantive campaign platform to promote. I suppose Caroline Mulroney or Christine Elliott could turn out to be moderately competent and not too offensive - if either Allen or Ford get in, it's welcome to another term in office for Wynne. |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12443702)
I think Patrick Brown's difficulty - aside from the obvious one that he appears to be at best a creep and at worst a serially offensive abuser of his power-relationships with women - is that he is an odious and oleaginous toad who nobody in their right mind would want leading the province. And that the Conservative party saw this and were only too delighted to use the sexual misconduct allegations to drop him like a stone.
I find the whole leadership election thing now strangely fascinating. Tanya Granic Allen (who she?) is trying for Hudak/Brown redux. Mulroney, Elliott and Ford are all trading off the reputation of their more famous family member (father, husband and brother respectively) without having any substantive campaign platform to promote. I suppose Caroline Mulroney or Christine Elliott could turn out to be moderately competent and not too offensive - if either Allen or Ford get in, it's welcome to another term in office for Wynne. If all of what you say above is true, I can't understand why the conservatives voted Brown in as their leader in the first place? Chirstine Elliott seemed a much better choice. |
Re: Patrick Brown
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12443730)
Surely Wynne can't get in again after what she has done to this province?
What are the top three things Wynne has changed? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:35 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.