![]() |
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by Tumbling_Dice
(Post 13246341)
I have to confess I was not expecting a reasonable answer..
if you want to critique someone's presentation style, I give you Trudeau |
Re: The next election
Here is a good explanation of the Canadian political system:
|
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13245603)
The delivery style. A little bit game show host.
|
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by withabix
(Post 13246803)
I think Trump sounds more like a bad stand-up comedian. In a pub/working mens club. That sort.
|
Re: The next election
|
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13250338)
|
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy
(Post 13250397)
To be fair Trudeau just dismissing citizens with concerns as extremists and conspiracy theorists doesn’t exactly help. It may be true that there is an element of that, but thats not how you deal with it, and overall Trudeau has been appalling in his management of discontent.
An element? Try MacKenzie's wiki page and a few other pieces. |
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 13250399)
When you say Trudeau you also mean US Department of State's Bureau of Counterterrorism, the RCMP, Canada's House of Commons.
An element? Try MacKenzie's wiki page and a few other pieces. |
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy
(Post 13250431)
I thought he met with anti carbon tax protesters, I didn’t know it was a specific hate group, my fault for not looking closer first.
If this is the best Trudeau has to offer, he is toast at the next election. |
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 13250463)
He did, while travelling. The clip doesn't show that he knew anything of the symbol that was written on the inside of a door.
If this is the best Trudeau has to offer, he is toast at the next election. But it's either worrying that PP continues to associate with these types and is admired by Alex Jones without any attempt at dissociating himself, or doesn't care, or isn't receiving better advice from people who should know about these things even if he doesn't. |
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 13246353)
Do you have specific examples of Trudeau's corruption, something like Mulrooney and Airbus or Chretien and his golf courses?
I see no point of contact between Poilievre and reality.. He's had a sheltered life and now consorts with fringe characters. He's not a politician one would ask to guess the price of bread and milk but to guess what bread and milk are used for. He also seems short, not so much Trumpist as Trumpette. |
Re: The next election
Poilievre and his party have well and truly entered the world of Trump politics.
Canada: bitter clash in parliament over Trudeau ‘wacko’ jibe Trying to claim use of words like wacko and extremist in the House as normal "doing his job" behaviour. :rolleyes: |
Re: The next election
Is that the best they can come up with? Pretty sure sock boy used the word extremist and spineless in his comebacks. I am certainly not defending PP and I think the shine has dulled on the trust boy who is part of the Gatineau elite. Canadian politics is somewhat dull and let's face it most developed countries are in a bit of a mess and surprise surprise uncontrolled Immigration is usually one of the most talked about problems. Meanwhile us normal folk just get on with life knowing that our thoughts on certain subject are dismissed as you know these politicians of all stripes know what is best for the country except when you have referendums :rofl:
|
Re: The next election
Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
(Post 13251253)
Is that the best they can come up with? Pretty sure sock boy used the word extremist and spineless in his comebacks.
A google shows Trudeau has described extremists as extremists outside the House and/or collectives of unnamed. That's very different. And other tories are attempting to normalise that level of House behaviour. |
Re: The next election
Poilievre withdrew "wacko" and changed it to "radical", but the speaker seemed to want to make an example out of him and refused to accept a change and wanted a complete withdrawal. Kind of a strange incident. I agree that it wasn't appropriate language but I think it was poorly handled. Also Trudeau referring to Poilievre as having spineless leadership should have also been reprimanded as that's a hair away from name calling, but the speaker let that one slide.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:09 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.