Medals Tables...
#1
Thread Starter










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
#2
I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
#3
Thread Starter










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











Or maybe they really don't give a crap what they get just so long as they get a lot of it. A bit like in ABC country restaurants.
Last edited by Alan2005; Feb 17th 2010 at 6:47 pm.
#4
Banned





Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 862
From: The City by the Mall











I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds this kind of odd. It's all a bit "never mind the quality, feel the width".
#7
I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
#11
I prefer the quality over quantity argument, though technically there is no "correct" method.
Read the Wikipedia page on it the other day
Read the Wikipedia page on it the other day
Would you rather have 12 gold medals or 13 bronze medals???
Maybe the North Americans are learning to celebrate mediocrity like us Brits.
#12
Forum Regular



Joined: May 2009
Posts: 144
From: Wolfville, NS











Italy - 8 gold, 9 silver, 10 bronze
France - 7 gold, 16 silver, 18 bronze
Those mediocre French certainly deserved to finish below the Italians in the medal table.
I seem to recall the Americans, or certainly the American press, using whatever ranking method gave them the best position at the time.
The ideal method would be to apply a weighting to each medal type.
#13
Look at the Beijing Olympics:
Italy - 8 gold, 9 silver, 10 bronze
France - 7 gold, 16 silver, 18 bronze
Those mediocre French certainly deserved to finish below the Italians in the medal table.
I seem to recall the Americans, or certainly the American press, using whatever ranking method gave them the best position at the time.
The ideal method would be to apply a weighting to each medal type.
Italy - 8 gold, 9 silver, 10 bronze
France - 7 gold, 16 silver, 18 bronze
Those mediocre French certainly deserved to finish below the Italians in the medal table.
I seem to recall the Americans, or certainly the American press, using whatever ranking method gave them the best position at the time.
The ideal method would be to apply a weighting to each medal type.
#15







Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,159

I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two.
Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely.



