![]() |
Medals Tables...
I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two. Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely. |
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8353370)
I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two. Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely. |
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8353379)
I agree this one is a bit of a conundrum. Its sort of a qualitative versus quantitative perspective.
Or maybe they really don't give a crap what they get just so long as they get a lot of it. A bit like in ABC country restaurants. |
Re: Medals Tables...
I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds this kind of odd. It's all a bit "never mind the quality, feel the width".
|
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by bsmith
(Post 8353466)
I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds this kind of odd. It's all a bit "never mind the quality, feel the width".
|
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8353476)
Not something mrs bsmith has to deal with.
|
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8353370)
I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two. Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely. |
Re: Medals Tables...
I prefer the quality over quantity argument, though technically there is no "correct" method.
Read the Wikipedia page on it the other day |
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Lord Vader
(Post 8354506)
Why bother awarding silver and bronze then?
|
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by James Martindale
(Post 8355191)
So if you are tied on Gold medals you can then move along the commodities to distinguish who is ahead.
|
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Hobbess
(Post 8354674)
I prefer the quality over quantity argument, though technically there is no "correct" method.
Read the Wikipedia page on it the other day Would you rather have 12 gold medals or 13 bronze medals??? Maybe the North Americans are learning to celebrate mediocrity like us Brits. |
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by James Martindale
(Post 8355198)
Would you rather have 12 gold medals or 13 bronze medals???
Maybe the North Americans are learning to celebrate mediocrity like us Brits. Italy - 8 gold, 9 silver, 10 bronze France - 7 gold, 16 silver, 18 bronze Those mediocre French certainly deserved to finish below the Italians in the medal table. I seem to recall the Americans, or certainly the American press, using whatever ranking method gave them the best position at the time. The ideal method would be to apply a weighting to each medal type. |
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Deva
(Post 8355273)
Look at the Beijing Olympics:
Italy - 8 gold, 9 silver, 10 bronze France - 7 gold, 16 silver, 18 bronze Those mediocre French certainly deserved to finish below the Italians in the medal table. I seem to recall the Americans, or certainly the American press, using whatever ranking method gave them the best position at the time. The ideal method would be to apply a weighting to each medal type. |
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by James Martindale
(Post 8355292)
Refreshingly in Beijing I did not have to look below 4th spot :)
|
Re: Medals Tables...
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8353370)
I noticed this at the time of the Beijing Olympics, but North Americans seem to rank their medals tables based on quantity rather than quality.
For example Canada is 4th according to the Vancouver Sun, with a total of 6 medals of all colours. However, the BBC rightly put them as fifth behind the Swiss who have three golds to Canada's two. Why is this? Is that normal here? No amount of bronze medals equals a gold surely. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:01 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.