![]() |
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11189019)
I don't think it has, at least not in the mainstream media. Seems like it's only been the last decade or so that graphic photos or film have been regularly shown. I'm referring to the UK media primarily, although perhaps Canada is the same. I think some of the European media (Italy for example) have more of a history of showing brutal deaths etc.
you don't have to trust me on that, (I certainly wouldn't) :-) |
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11189033)
No, Pulitzer winning photos depicting death have been here since Nanking and maybe before.
you don't have to trust me on that, (I certainly wouldn't) :-) |
Re: Malaysian 777
The only special circumstances were when death images could not be obtained, and that wasn't very often. I cite the Pulitzer Prize because that is the ultimate example of world wide recognition, by no means a minority thing. Look up Nguyen Noc Loan, Kent State, MLK, Sharpesville, that's the downside to it; when people get hurt, t's news.
|
Re: Malaysian 777
I recall a Guardian piece recently that argued that pictures of black, dead people were acceptable, and more prolific, in Western media (eg. the recent Nigerian terrorist attack) but not white people.
|
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by lookingtogo
(Post 11189619)
I recall a Guardian piece recently that argued that pictures of black, dead people were acceptable, and more prolific, in Western media (eg. the recent Nigerian terrorist attack) but not white people.
|
Re: Malaysian 777
So today's MH370 news is that a "concentration" of debris comprising less than 1 item/sq mile has been found. ..... I wonder if they realise that they're searching within the Indian Ocean garbage patch? :unsure:
|
Re: Malaysian 777
This is why they emphasized that it was "shiny" I think.
Apparently they're pretty sure now it was the capt. that did it as his missus had dumped him and his new missus was about to. The theory seems to be that he programmed the autopilot, then committed suicide by taking the plane up to 45,000 ft. Which would seem to indicate he got the first officer out of the cockpit somehow, "go get me a drink". |
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by Steve_
(Post 11193917)
This is why they emphasized that it was "shiny" I think.
Apparently they're pretty sure now it was the capt. that did it as his missus had dumped him and his new missus was about to. The theory seems to be that he programmed the autopilot, then committed suicide by taking the plane up to 45,000 ft. Which would seem to indicate he got the first officer out of the cockpit somehow, "go get me a drink". Hijacking by a passenger I would find difficult to believe, because it's most likely impossible to bring a gun on board to overpower the pilot and the crew. if they never found the plane, and the debris in the water turns out to be not from a plane, than I would guess, it was most likely theft, either plane, spare parts or cargo. and then there is always the possibility of a mechanical error, and the crew/passengers suffocating and flying onwards over the ocean until they run out of fuel I would rule out suicide, because in the case of suicide there is always a letter I would also rule out terrorism, because no terrorist group has claimed any responsibility |
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by Cabbagetown
(Post 11193926)
I think that there are too many theories and too few strong facts to say anything.
Hijacking by a passenger I would find difficult to believe, because it's most likely impossible to bring a gun on board to overpower the pilot and the crew. if they never found the plane, and the debris in the water turns out to be not from a plane, than I would guess, it was most likely theft, either plane, spare parts or cargo. and then there is always the possibility of a mechanical error, and the crew/passengers suffocating and flying onwards over the ocean until they run out of fuel I would rule out suicide, because in the case of suicide there is always a letter I would also rule out terrorism, because no terrorist group has claimed any responsibility |
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by Cabbagetown
(Post 11193926)
..... Hijacking by a passenger I would find difficult to believe, because it's most likely impossible to bring a gun on board to overpower the pilot and the crew....
.... if they never found the plane, and the debris in the water turns out to be not from a plane, than I would guess, it was most likely theft, either plane, spare parts ...... .... I would rule out suicide, because in the case of suicide there is always a letter. |
Re: Malaysian 777
In the absence of facts, nobody has any idea what happened and any suppositions put forth to date are groundless.
|
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11194032)
In the absence of facts, nobody has any idea what happened and any suppositions put forth to date are groundless.
|
Re: Malaysian 777
The next few weather 'windows' searchers have as winter closes in down there will probably be the last chances they get to find pieces. This search has to be the biggest ever, doesn't it?
|
Re: Malaysian 777
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11194042)
..... This search has to be the biggest ever, doesn't it?
If you're interested go and Google <Indian Ocean garbage patch> and read the Wikipedia article. It will explain why the searchers are finding so many "items" and why it is likely that NONE of them have ANY connection to MH370! |
Re: Malaysian 777
:frown:
Originally Posted by Cabbagetown
(Post 11193926)
I would rule out suicide, because in the case of suicide there is always a letter |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:04 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.