Keep Right
#16
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











Maybe if the highways had the ability to handle the volume of traffic more could stay in the right lane, but in parts of the lower mainland there is far too much traffic for just the right lane to handle, so traffic has to move into the left lane regardless of speed.
Just another failure in the BC highway system though, some reason they have an inability to build efficient highways in BC.
Just another failure in the BC highway system though, some reason they have an inability to build efficient highways in BC.
#17
Thread Starter
Up Your Kilt






Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,621
From: 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Mockingbird Heights











For me, the sign would make more sense looking like this.
(excuse the quick cut and paste skills)
(excuse the quick cut and paste skills)
#19
Thread Starter
Up Your Kilt






Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,621
From: 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Mockingbird Heights











Haha. Maybe that could be the penalty for not moving over. A good smack of leather across your ass!
#23
The PITA thing ive noticed on Alberta highways is the signs say "Slower traffic keep right" hence people in the left lane doing the speed limit think its okay to be there just because they're doing 110, when the rest of the traffic wants to go 120-130.
You are not the law because you're doing the speed limit in the outside lane, you're actually a hazard and creating more danger
if i want to risk a ticket by going 10 over then thats my prerogative
You are not the law because you're doing the speed limit in the outside lane, you're actually a hazard and creating more danger
if i want to risk a ticket by going 10 over then thats my prerogative
#24
That traffic sign is appalling!
Welcome to the Grid System.
Fundamentally flawed by having traffic signals with pedestrian crossings with vehicle conflict at almost every intersection.
Nearly all intersections could be improved by having a single dedicated pedestrian phase on all legs at once with no vehicle pedestrian conflict.
Congestion would increase a little and that is the problem in Canada and USA where the car rules and there are very few pedestrians outside city centres, in comparison with European countries.
More roundabouts would also be useful, but then of course Canadians would have to a) learn to use indicators and b) not stop half way round to give way to a vehicle entering c) give way to vehicles on the roundabout.
Welcome to the Grid System.
Fundamentally flawed by having traffic signals with pedestrian crossings with vehicle conflict at almost every intersection.
Nearly all intersections could be improved by having a single dedicated pedestrian phase on all legs at once with no vehicle pedestrian conflict.
Congestion would increase a little and that is the problem in Canada and USA where the car rules and there are very few pedestrians outside city centres, in comparison with European countries.
More roundabouts would also be useful, but then of course Canadians would have to a) learn to use indicators and b) not stop half way round to give way to a vehicle entering c) give way to vehicles on the roundabout.
Roundabouts are safer for pedestrians....
#25
I dont think they are. Cars dont stop at roundabouts so even though pedestrians may theoretically have the right of way they never get to exercise it.
I do agree on swapping 4ways for roundabouts though. Its happening more often around my area so there is hope yet for sensible traffic management in Canada.
I do agree on swapping 4ways for roundabouts though. Its happening more often around my area so there is hope yet for sensible traffic management in Canada.
Last edited by iaink; Nov 27th 2014 at 11:20 am.
#26
I dont think they are. Cars dont stop at roundabouts so even though pedestrians may theoretically have the right of way they never get to exercise it.
I do agree on swapping 4ways for roundabouts though. Its happening more often around my area so there is hope yet for sensible traffic management in Canada.
I do agree on swapping 4ways for roundabouts though. Its happening more often around my area so there is hope yet for sensible traffic management in Canada.
Yeah, I hope they swap more of them out. I hate 4ways.
#27
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











+1 on the roundabouts. The other day I got literally yelled at for commenting that they should remove the all way stop near my school that backs up traffic for a good half kilometre every morning and afternoon with every.single.car having to stop at the sign before moving through, and replace it with a roundabout. They asked me if my aim was to increase the risk of pedestrians getting run over in the roundabout?
Roundabouts are safer for pedestrians....
Roundabouts are safer for pedestrians....We have a few roundabouts in town here in Squamish, people tend to still stop before entering. Yield seems to = stop in people's minds.
#30
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,082
From: Maple Ridge, Super Natural British Columbia











Stop = reduce speed by 25% and keep going (unless 100% certain to T-bone someone)
Yield = Merge dangerously in front of the other car that has the right of way, forcing them to take avoiding action
Merge = Drive up the right lane (or verge) and force your way in further ahead because your truck has a 'lift' and you have a small willy.
Red = Stop only if you are 100% certain to T-bone someone or you are the fifth car after the lights went Red.
Right Turn on Red = Especially recommended if you cause someone turning Left into the same lane to take avoiding action
The other one that 'amuses' me is:
Green = I got to the lights first when they were Red, so when they turn Green I'm going to treat it the same way as a 4-way stop and turn left across the vehicle that's going straight on...
Last edited by withabix; Nov 28th 2014 at 10:14 am.



