![]() |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11280982)
I thought we were discussing mass shootings of strangers rather than an inherently violent society such as SA. Canada vs USA, more guns per capita in Canada I've read and fewer of these mass killings. No reference to hand.
I really don't know, but it does seem a cop out to blame it on mental illness. However, I think some other aspects of life here may contribute, for example very defined cliques in schools, which appears to have been a factor with Rodgers. |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by confused_uk
(Post 11280405)
scootb
I was referring to American laws not Canadian, also I have no intention of moving somewhere then making them change their laws. I hate guns, that's my opinion & I'm entitled to it, though I understand your point of farmers needing them & have no issue with that. I also hate hunting, I think it's cruel (unless you're a live off the land type of person), you want to go out in the woods & have a little bonding time your buddies, fine, why must you kill something to do that, especially when you have no intention of eating your kill, it's a waste of a life. Makes me sick when I see people posing next to dead animals. Not deliberately trying to ruffle your feathers on the subject it's just my opinion. |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11280423)
You should be aware that the long gun laws in Canada are, in short, "if you want one, you can have one". Grandfathering means that some types of firearms that have been banned in the US can be legally owned in Canada.
It's even legal for me to drive around in my open convertible car with a car on the back seat and to leave the car parked with just a blanket over the gun. And it's not just the drivers of pastel Beetles who are allowed to do this! I suggest that you read up on the firearms laws! |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11280982)
I really don't know, but it does seem a cop out to blame it on mental illness. I think the choice is between having freedom to arm ourselves and keeping the public safe. Canada and the US are more risk tolerant in this regard than the European countries despite there being no better reason to own a gun in one than the others. Another cop out, btw, is to say that one shouldn't consider violence in South Africa as being comparable to violence in other countries because there's a lot of violence in South Africa. It's a place with a lot of guns so a lot of people get shot. |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by scootb
(Post 11281000)
Actually that just shows your ignorance mate,that breaks storage laws,if you leave a firearm unattended in a car you must apply a trigger lock!
I suggest that you read up on the firearms laws! |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by scootb
(Post 11280996)
Does the meat section in Walmart,or the local butchers offend you also?
|
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by London Mike
(Post 11279959)
John Oliver said today:
'One failed attempt at a shoe-bomb and we all take off our shoes at the airport. 31 school shootings since Columbine and no change in the regulation of guns.' Wise words. For someone who is supposed to be up to speed on the news he doesn't seem to have been paying attention! |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by confused_uk
(Post 11280976)
Elliot Rodgers was already on the radar as someone a bit disturbed & having counseling, there's no way he would've passed a hypothetical psych test
All this waffle about changing societal attitudes and so on is so much bollocks. Nothing will change in America until a sufficiently liberal-minded Supreme Court defines the Second Amendment more tightly. Until then, every single attempt to limit access to guns, of any kind, will be overturned by the courts. Just look at what machinations Chicago is having to go through to limit gun sales in the city, where the city government and most of the population (who voted them in) actually want to change the system. They can't ban sales altogether (because Right To Bear Arms) so are playing with regulation in the same way that other municipalities have tried to marginalize released sex offenders: not within x feet of a school, or a park, or whatever. FFS, those are the kind of petty regulatory hurdles that you expect from a dysfunctional council on a nonsense measure (like, oh I don't know, Toronto screwing up the licensing of street food vendors), not as the only avenue left to try to stop its citizens from killing each other. Until then, too many guns remain too easily accessible to people who are too screwed up to realise that shooting other people is not the appropriate response to whatever it is they have a grievance with. Of course it happens elsewhere in the world, but happens with monotonous regularity in the States, and (as has been mentioned up-thread) the short-term knee jerks that "something must be done" are out-lasted by the long game of the NRA and its good ol' boy supporters. |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 11281009)
It doesn't offend me. Hunting does though. Hunting is vandalism with cruelty. A huge mess made of the countryside just so something, anything, can get splattered.
You are entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine. Is it vandalism with cruelty when a cow has a metal spike blown through its skull in a slaughterhouse,or is that ok because when it reaches you its in a plastic wrapper? I clean up after myself when I go shooting,even picking up spent shell casings,yes I agree that some people in any country will make a mess and leave it,look at the recent mess in BC,or the state of the UK countryside these days,nevermind the cities. |
Re: Guns
LA Times article.
Ah yes, “A record 11 bills were signed into law, including measures to keep guns out of dangerous hands and closing loopholes in California’s law prohibiting large capacity magazines,†Wilcox said. |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by scootb
(Post 11281024)
Is it vandalism with cruelty when a cow has a metal spike blown through its skull in a slaughterhouse,or is that ok because when it reaches you its in a plastic wrapper? |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian
(Post 11280206)
The problem area is long guns/rifles be they single shot, semi automatic or full automatic.
A traditional hunter has no need for an AK47 or M16 or a semi automatic. Sure pop a deer with a 30.06 or 7mm Magnum but single shot only please. Semi and full auto should be left for law enforcement and the military. |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by Steve_
(Post 11281018)
There have been tons of changes in the regulation around guns in the US since Columbine and since Newtown for that matter.
For someone who is supposed to be up to speed on the news he doesn't seem to have been paying attention! For example, the background checks law that GWBush signed after Virginia Tech relied on States entering mental health records into the system in order to work. Many states have entered fewer than 100 records, in total, into their systems. Fat lot of good that does to prevent dangerously unbalanced people from getting hold of guns. And of all the proposed legislative changes after Sandy Hook, just one - yes, one single piece of legislation - was passed into law. That was a New York state law requiring the registration (note, not limiting ownership or use, just requiring registration) of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Can you cite one substantive regulatory change that would give the lie to what John Oliver claims? Do you suppose that what minor changes have been made have actually prevented one single person from possessing a gun? |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by scootb
(Post 11281024)
Is it vandalism with cruelty when a cow has a metal spike blown through its skull in a slaughterhouse,or is that ok because when it reaches you its in a plastic wrapper?.
To my knowledge a stray captive bolt has never left a hole in any of my riverside neighbors living room picture windows... |
Re: Guns
Originally Posted by Sally Redux
(Post 11280733)
The student who shot up Isla Vista last weekend had 3 legally-owned handguns.
I think that was a BIG part of the problem. Yet the rate of firearm-related homicide in California is slightly more than 3/100,000 and is 0.76/100,000 in Alberta. In fact the rate in California is slightly higher than the US national average, despite having much tougher gun laws. There is something different about the US and Canada, and my personal view is that it is largely cultural. What those factors are is hard to say, lack of social mobility (i.e. gangs in L.A.), worse mental healthcare, worse education system, etc. I'm sure are all factors but Americans culturally just seem to be more trigger happy going by their media. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:20 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.