Wikiposts

Ford on Kimmel

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 3:59 am
  #16  
?
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 150
jwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Cyclists http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yiu1uLgwF1E
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:11 am
  #17  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by Oink
They'll come in really useful for when half the city has to bike down to the unemployment office to pick up their cheques. While lovely in principle its a case of ideology suffocating the reality of economics.
I see loads of businesses on my bike downtown? And more and more people cycling too
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:12 am
  #18  
Oink's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 20,188
Oink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond reputeOink has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by jwtimmon
I like cycling. Its a healthy, fun activity. But we have places like Stanley Park where you can ride around all day long. The problem is that some people in Vancouver and probably other West coast cities, seem to believe they can create some sort of northern European communal idyll while in reality the sort of policies they propose are throttling the very economic oxygen supply the city depends upon.The only thing that's even allowing such nonsense is the opiate of property taxes. But ironically those who are most in favour of bikes lanes and other such idiocy are finding they're getting pushed further out of the city they want to tranquillize. We need a Rob Ford!
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:15 am
  #19  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by Oink
I like cycling. Its a healthy, fun activity. But we have places like Stanley Park where you can ride around all day long. The problem is that some people in Vancouver and probably other West coast cities, seem to believe they can create some sort of northern European communal idyll while in reality the sort of policies they propose are throttling the very economic oxygen supply the city depends upon.The only thing that's even allowing such nonsense is the opiate of property taxes. But ironically those who are most in favour of bikes lanes and other such idiocy are finding they're getting pushed further out of the city they want to tranquillize. We need a Rob Ford!
not really. I live in the 'burbs, I can't cycle around stanley park all day long. Biking to and from work downtown is my best chance to get exercise, AND it takes another car off the road, arguably leaving more room for commercial traffic.

I don't see any evidence of the city being throttled. The port is still there and the main roads to the port (hastings, dundas, etc) don't have bike lanes. Lougheed highway - no bike separated bike lanes. Oak - no separated bike lanes. Main - same. Knight - same. Those are all the main arteries in and out of the city. The lanes are on quiet side streets.

Last edited by ExKiwilass; Mar 4th 2014 at 4:17 am.
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:18 am
  #20  
?
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 150
jwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to beholdjwtimmon is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

I like cycling too and encourage my kids to cycle as well as I think its a healthy low impact exercise.

What I hate with a passion are cyclists who think they can ignore the rules of the road unless it suits them. Breaking red traffic lights, no signals and cycling on paths used by pedestrians. Yet the same ones, and I've watched cyclists do this, hurl abuse at any motorist they feel is not following the rules of the road e.g. making sure that it's safe to proceed on a green because some a***hole of a cyclist is bombing through a red traffic light that turned red 5 seconds ago.
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:20 am
  #21  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

yeah, some cyclists are idiots but so are a lot of drivers. And a lot of drivers HERE, in Van, are clueless about what it's like to ride a bike and get mad over normal biking behaviour. Don't whine if you're stuck behind a cyclist on a bike street - there are many, many side streets for cars. Take one of those and shut your pie holes, car drivers.
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:25 am
  #22  
magnumpi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nuther day in paradise.ca
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,269
From: Ajax, Ontario
magnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

http://m.torontosun.com/2012/11/12/r...e-lane-removal

Ha ha Ford stood and applauded when the lanes were removed. Now that's a Hands on Mayor
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:33 am
  #23  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

we will never get a Ford for the simple reason that Vancouver is not amalgamated with the outer burbs so Vancouverites will vote on what works for Vancouver as a city, not what works for Surrey or Maple Ridge or wherever else the car-dependent choose to live. I'm glad actually. I live in the 'burb outside Van and our city doesn't want more traffic either, neither does New Westminster, which is fighting with Surrey over the new Patullo bridge. Why should we have to lose quality of life because some people choose to live far away?
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 4:56 am
  #24  
dbd33's Avatar
Assimilated Pauper
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 40,070
From: Ontario
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by ExKiwilass
Why should we have to lose quality of life because some people choose to live far away?
Ford, who lives far away from Toronto, might argue that more people commute than live in the city. The people living in the city have the advantage of not spending much of their day getting to and from work, they're privleged, why should they have the additional advantage of resources such as parts of streets being devoted to them? Urban bicycle paths and, indeed, pavements (known as sidewalks locally) detract from the quality of life of the car borne masses, they're an indulgence and an inappropriate use of tax revenues. He might add that for each hundred yards of pavement eliminated he would save the city a trillion dollars.
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 5:19 am
  #25  
Partially discharged's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,366
Partially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond reputePartially discharged has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by jwtimmon

What I hate with a passion are cyclists who think they can ignore the rules of the road unless it suits them. Breaking red traffic lights, no signals and cycling on paths used by pedestrians.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3nMn...eaZQIj4NwXd_Up

This should make your day
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 5:54 am
  #26  
slanderer of the innocent
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC
ExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond reputeExKiwilass has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by dbd33
Ford, who lives far away from Toronto, might argue that more people commute than live in the city. The people living in the city have the advantage of not spending much of their day getting to and from work, they're privleged, why should they have the additional advantage of resources such as parts of streets being devoted to them? Urban bicycle paths and, indeed, pavements (known as sidewalks locally) detract from the quality of life of the car borne masses, they're an indulgence and an inappropriate use of tax revenues. He might add that for each hundred yards of pavement eliminated he would save the city a trillion dollars.
Totally. it's a war of lifestyles. Luckily, we aren't amalgamated with the car-huggers so they don't get to impose their lifestyle on us...much...
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 8:11 am
  #27  
Shard's Avatar
Realist
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 24,667
From: UK
Shard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond reputeShard has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by burks
I would vote for him if I lived in Toronto (..and was able to vote in Canada!). Would prefer to have him as a Mayor than some stuck up privately educated toff.
Not a fan of Boris Johnson then?
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 8:44 am
  #28  
burks's Avatar
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 815
From: The 'Wack
burks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond reputeburks has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by Shard
Not a fan of Boris Johnson then?
I only like him because he falls over in rivers, gets stuck on zip lines, admits trying cocaine and calls New Yorkers fat on Letterman.

It makes him more genuine.. can't stand the accent though!
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 10:19 am
  #29  
limey party pooper
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 10,000
bats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond reputebats has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by jwtimmon
Didn't think it was even allegedly any more, the police investigated and found inconsistencies in wifes story. Police dropped it.

He's a big bloke, I'd have thought if he was beating her there'd be zero doubt about it.
The inconsistency was that she changed her mind about him being violent. Par for the course with abused spouses.
 
Old Mar 4th 2014 | 2:49 pm
  #30  
rwin's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,898
From: Calgary
rwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond reputerwin has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Ford on Kimmel

Originally Posted by Oink
Doesn't alter the fact that Vancouver needs someone like Rob Ford
Who does Burnaby need?
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.