F%#king Rogers!!!

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 17th 2007, 4:51 pm

#16

iaink

Moderαtor Emeritus

Joined: Sep 2003

Location: Upstate South Carolina

Posts: 30,768

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calgal

I'm going Virgin

Feel free to let me pimp you

Jan 17th 2007, 4:53 pm

#17

Calgal

BE Forum Addict

Joined: Apr 2005

Location: The Republic of Bacon

Posts: 3,192

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by iaink

Feel free to let me pimp you

Oooooh you are awful - but I like you!

Jan 17th 2007, 4:59 pm

#18

neill

BE Forum Addict

Joined: Dec 2005

Location: Colorado Springs

Posts: 1,214

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbd33

Rogers is an outstandingly bad company to deal with and renowned for disreputable billing practices. Bell would be marginally better but they have this intensely irritating robot answering system which asks you to enter your phone number and then transfers you to someone who then asks your phone number. We're about to move and I'm in a real dilemma over whether or not I want a phone enough to deal with Bell again.

Rogers are crap, bell are rude and crap, fido are amateurs, telus is irritating and crap. crap crap crap. Virgin is "an unknown quantity at this point" as we say around here.

Jan 17th 2007, 5:00 pm

#19

Mr Lee

BE Enthusiast

Thread Starter

Joined: Nov 2003

Location: Off moaning somewhere...

Posts: 882

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carmoral

I was with Fido in Canada dont think they do a sim for the UK, there is a good one though, but not sure if Im allowed to say there name on the forum, incase Im accused of spamming

What does it begin with?

Jan 17th 2007, 5:00 pm

#20

Butch Cassidy

Banned

Joined: Dec 2005

Location: In Limbo

Posts: 15,706

Butch Cassidy has a reputation beyond repute

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by neill

Rogers are crap, bell are rude and crap, fido are amateurs, telus is irritating and crap. crap crap crap. Virgin is "an unknown quantity at this point" as we say around here.

And your point????

Jan 17th 2007, 5:04 pm

#21

Steve_P

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 15,883

Steve_P is an unknown quantity at this point

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calgal

I'm going Virgin

It's too late, that won't work.

Jan 17th 2007, 5:21 pm

#22

Calgal

BE Forum Addict

Joined: Apr 2005

Location: The Republic of Bacon

Posts: 3,192

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve_P

It's too late, that won't work.

How do you know? Just 'cos I 'have' kids, doesn't mean I gave birth to them;

Jan 17th 2007, 5:23 pm

#23

Steve_P

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 15,883

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calgal

How do you know? Just 'cos I 'have' kids, doesn't mean I gave birth to them;

Not going there, nope not at all.

Jan 17th 2007, 5:25 pm

#24

Calgal

BE Forum Addict

Joined: Apr 2005

Location: The Republic of Bacon

Posts: 3,192

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve_P

Not going there, nope not at all.

Jan 17th 2007, 5:30 pm

#25

dakota44

Lost in BE Cyberspace

Joined: Dec 2006

Location: Nova Scotia Canada

Posts: 27,078

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calgal

I'm going Virgin

does that involve some surgical reversal or Reinstallation of the hymen?

Jan 17th 2007, 5:36 pm

#26

Calgal

BE Forum Addict

Joined: Apr 2005

Location: The Republic of Bacon

Posts: 3,192

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dakota44

does that involve some surgical reversal or Reinstallation of the hymen?

LOL, yeah they do that nowadays. I remember hearing about it...errr somewhere

Jan 17th 2007, 5:45 pm

#27

Mr Lee

BE Enthusiast

Thread Starter

Joined: Nov 2003

Location: Off moaning somewhere...

Posts: 882

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dakota44

does that involve some surgical reversal or Reinstallation of the hymen?

Hmmm...

This is going off-topic in a way we could never have imagined.

Jan 17th 2007, 5:55 pm

#28

neill

BE Forum Addict

Joined: Dec 2005

Location: Colorado Springs

Posts: 1,214

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Butch Cassidy

And your point????

That they are all crap. obviously

I dunno, it seems like they could learn something from the UK market. Bell could do with some proper competition on the land line front for sure.

Last edited by neill; Jan 17th 2007 at 5:57 pm.

Jan 17th 2007, 6:02 pm

#29

iaink

Moderαtor Emeritus

Joined: Sep 2003

Location: Upstate South Carolina

Posts: 30,768

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by neill

That they are all crap. obviously

Ive had not one issue with my two Virign mobile phones. Not that we use them much. I guess if we were heavier users then PAYGo would not make financial sense anyway.

Jan 18th 2007, 8:54 am

#30

Carmoral

Forum Regular

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 48

Re: F%#king Rogers!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Lee

What does it begin with?

lol, well seen as everyone one else is mentioning other companies I dont suppose it will hurt, to put their first name lol, they are called Mobal, if you type that in the google search it will come up, they are the home of the $49 world phone.

Closed Thread Share

First
Prev
2 / 3
Next
Last