![]() |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126064)
Oh, OK. Crackpots, irrational. Fine by me. I think we both defined whom we admire. You call an ex-partisan, lifelong anti-fascist character a "harridan" and "a crackpot peddling irrational bile". Personally, I admire someone like that.
I think you're just trying to make a caricature here. Lack of arguments? Fallaci caricatured herself. It's difficult to see how she could have advanced reasoned debate by introducing defecation. |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 5126030)
Ok. Let's move on.
I'm not clear on who you think counts as a European. Do you accept that Trevor Phillips is a European? How about Mohamed Al-Fayed or Rachida Dati? They're three people having wildly different histories and belonging to different cultures but geographically on the same continent. Hence, my answer is: Trevor and Rachida are British and French. Not hyphenated-British, not hyphenated-French. British and French. Mr. Al Fayed is Egyptian - and I don't see that as anything inferior (or superior!) to being British. But he-is-Egyptian. For me, that is. And, by the way: you know, don't you, what kind of comments has Ken Livingstone been making about Trevor? the BNP-enrollment thingie? It's got the "wow" factor, innit? just like in Orianna's case... |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126126)
You're talking about people, I was talking about countries/cultures, not about inept (and ultimately racist) notions as the Blutrecht. A pure-breed Scott, born in the heartland of Scotland is actually what he is because he grew up there, in that specific culture; had he been brought up in, say, China, he would've been Chinese, no matter what his chromosomes would've shown.
Hence, my answer is: Trevor and Rachida are British and French. Not hyphenated-British, not hyphenated-French. British and French. Mr. Al Fayed is Egyptian - and I don't see that as anything inferior (or superior!) to being British. But he-is-Egyptian. For me, that is. And, by the way: you know, don't you, what kind of comments has Ken Livingstone been making about Trevor? the BNP-enrollment thingie? It's got the "wow" factor, innit? just like in Orianna's case... |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 5126105)
I don't think I've said who I admire. Personally I have a great regard for Charlie Watts.
Fallaci caricatured herself. It's difficult to see how she could have advanced reasoned debate by introducing defecation. May I remind you that, in one of my previous posts I had said "yobos", not Muslims, or Gypsies or any other specific nationalities. A "yobo", in our current context, is someone who has very different values (if any) than those of the society s/he lives in. I wouldn't urinate on a basilica or a monument or any other thing or symbol other people may cherish. That is, unless I were a yobo - someone who has knows what X means something to someone, but who couldn't care less. Sociopaths, asocials - yobos... From the Romanian Gypsies who devoured the Viennese swans of Schoenbrun years ago, to the inept youth who urinated on that cenotaph in Ottawa - they're all yobos. For me. YMMV. |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126126)
You're talking about people, I was talking about countries/cultures, not about inept (and ultimately racist) notions as the Blutrecht. A pure-breed Scott, born in the heartland of Scotland is actually what he is because he grew up there, in that specific culture; had he been brought up in, say, China, he would've been Chinese, no matter what his chromosomes would've shown.
Hence, my answer is: Trevor and Rachida are British and French. Not hyphenated-British, not hyphenated-French. British and French. Mr. Al Fayed is Egyptian - and I don't see that as anything inferior (or superior!) to being British. But he-is-Egyptian. For me, that is.
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126126)
And, by the way: you know, don't you, what kind of comments has Ken Livingstone been making about Trevor? the BNP-enrollment thingie? It's got the "wow" factor, innit? just like in Orianna's case...
|
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126174)
By voicing out her fears? after actually seeing people urinating in the streets?
May I remind you that, in one of my previous posts I had said "yobos", not Muslims, or Gypsies or any other specific nationalities. A "yobo", in our current context, is someone who has very different values (if any) than those of the society s/he lives in. I wouldn't urinate on a basilica or a monument or any other thing or symbol other people may cherish. That is, unless I were a yobo - someone who has knows what X means something to someone, but who couldn't care less. Sociopaths, asocials - yobos... From the Romanian Gypsies who devoured the Viennese swans of Schoenbrun years ago, to the inept youth who urinated on that cenotaph in Ottawa - they're all yobos. For me. YMMV. Ms. Fallici's defecators were specifically Muslim. She introduced the idea of sacred sites. That's hate speech and questionably legal in Canada. |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by hamshank
(Post 5126131)
just google christians in pakistan
1. Pakistan Christian Post 2. Pakistan Facts - Christians besieged in Pakistan 3. MISERIES OF CHRISTIANS IN PAKISTAN- Islam attacks Christians in ... 4. Pakistan's Christians are extremely fearful of Muslims etc. Er... what's that got to do with Trevor's cultural identity? Being Christian in a hardcore Islamic country is not a walk in the park - but who's ever doubted that? And - Trevor? what's he got to do with it? |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5125653)
"An extreme secularism predominates in Europe, especially among its elites, to the point that believing Christians (such as George W. Bush) are seen as mentally unbalanced and unfit for public office. In 2005, Rocco Buttiglione, a distinguished Italian politician and Catholic believer, was denied a position as Italy's European Union commissioner because of his views on such issues as homosexuality. Entrenched secularism also means empty churches: in London, researchers estimate, more Muslims attend mosques on Friday than do Christians churches on Sunday, although the city is home to roughly 7 times more born-Christians than born-Muslims. As Christianity fades, Islam beckons; Prince Charles exemplifies the fascination of many Europeans with Islam."
The rest of a lengthy, but worth reading article about Islam in Europe, can be found here: http://www.danielpipes.org/pf.php?id=4323 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1ZLXbKeL2U I wouldn't want to argue with PC. |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126208)
Sorry, the Monday factor must be kicking in: I don't quite follow. Here are the first results of my googling:
1. Pakistan Christian Post 2. Pakistan Facts - Christians besieged in Pakistan 3. MISERIES OF CHRISTIANS IN PAKISTAN- Islam attacks Christians in ... 4. Pakistan's Christians are extremely fearful of Muslims etc. Er... what's that got to do with Trevor's cultural identity? Being Christian in a hardcore Islamic country is not a walk in the park - but who's ever doubted that? And - Trevor? what's he got to do with it? I too googled and puzzled. DaveTheCat, do you intend to go to Canada? If so do you know that the population is at least as diverse as that of Europe, mosques are common and tolerance is a policy even of the current right wing government? |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 5126189)
Ms. Fallici's defecators were specifically Muslim. She introduced the idea of sacred sites. That's hate speech and questionably legal in Canada.
|
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by RobinHood
(Post 5126218)
Pat Condell sticks it to some "politically correct jackasses," from North America, on the subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1ZLXbKeL2U I wouldn't want to argue with PC. |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126242)
Oh, OK. For me, it would've been hate speech (in fact, the speech of a lunatic) if she had said "I hate Chileans and I think they will one day smear this or that with their faeces". But she described what she saw, instead.
Originally Posted by DaveTheCat
(Post 5126242)
Wasn't that you saying that in a PC-driven Toronto, the local police intentionally omit the ethnicity of the criminal?
|
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 5126248)
I can't say I've heard of him before but the link says he's a comedian. He doesn't seem very culturally sensitive. Is he the new Bernard Manning?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f01IBDoZGg |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 5126226)
I too googled and puzzled.
DaveTheCat, do you intend to go to Canada? If so do you know that the population is at least as diverse as that of Europe, mosques are common and tolerance is a policy even of the current right wing government? And, what's got diversity to do with cultural definitions? Good lord, you're implying that I'm a racist who won't fit into the Canadian society, aren't you? If I say that enclaves and ghettos (ethnic or otherwise) are harmful to any society and that integration has never negated any specific personal/ethnic identity, that makes me a fascist in your eyes? Good Lordy Lord... (Disclaimer: Just a figure of speech. I'm not a religious person). |
Re: Europe's Stark Options
Originally Posted by RobinHood
(Post 5126293)
You make your own mind up whether he's a racist. He certainly likes to take the mickey out of religion and the US regime:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f01IBDoZGg |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:11 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.