British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   European Elections (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/european-elections-613674/)

livermanl Jun 8th 2009 6:52 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7645849)
Steady on. It's only a European election and, according to the BBC this morning, they got less votes in the well publicised constituencies than at the last European election. It's just a protest vote, the Canadian parliament still contains more hard right nutters than the British one.


Originally Posted by newshoney (Post 7645894)
That's the problem - fewer votes but because of the low turnout it resulted in two seats. Personally I am against extremists wherever they fall on the spectrum. I'm not sure the BNP qualifies as 'nazi' but they are appealing to the ignorant underclass who think all their problems can be attributed to 'incomers' of various hues. As for hard-right nutters in Canada - which is the party that says you can only join if you are white?

I don't think that is their only target, I think there are more voters for the BNP because of issues like the EU and subsequent consequences to the country.

LondonPerth Jun 8th 2009 6:53 am

Re: European Elections
 
BNP have got less votes than before because of the low turnout it looks like they have done better than they actually have.
It was a protest vote and I know no one who likes them...they are no worries.

JonboyE Jun 8th 2009 6:53 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 7645872)
So what alternative then?

In electoral terms, nothing much. As long as they can stay on side of the incitement laws they have just as much right to organize and participate in the electoral process as anyone else. It is a clear warning to the problems inherent in proportional representation.

As to what can be done to halt the slide into extremist politics I don't think I have the answer. With the current bunch I think exposing them to public attention - appearances on Question Time for example - would help many people see them for what they are. The trouble is that would backfire if they ever got an intelligent and skillful rabble rouser for a leader.

newshoney Jun 8th 2009 6:56 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 7645910)
In electoral terms, nothing much. As long as they can stay on side of the incitement laws they have just as much right to organize and participate in the electoral process as anyone else. It is a clear warning to the problems inherent in proportional representation.

As to what can be done to halt the slide into extremist politics I don't think I have the answer. With the current bunch I think exposing them to public attention - appearances on Question Time for example - would help many people see them for what they are. The trouble is that would backfire if they ever got an intelligent and skillful rabble rouser for a leader.

Well but that's unlikely isn't it? Anyone intelligent realises that fascism is discredited and outmoded.

Almost Canadian Jun 8th 2009 6:56 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7645898)
I'm not aware of any such party but I put it to you that two Canadian MPs have been named on this thread who are to the right of anyone in the British parliament.

And why is that a bad thing?

Surely, in a democracy, people may vote for whoever is on the ballet card. If that means that the person you didn't vote for wins, why does that mean that you are right and they were wrong?

I have never voted in my life and I never intend to. It never ceases to amaze me how those (that tend to be east of Alberta) constently criticise the governing party in Canada, claiming that all their supporters are too "right wing".

They may be too right wing for liberal supporters, but what makes the liberals correct and the right wing supporters wrong?

It seems that democracy is OK to liberals, provided they always win.

Almost Canadian Jun 8th 2009 6:58 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by newshoney (Post 7645921)
Anyone intelligent realises that fascism is discredited and outmoded.

For how long has being able to demonstrate "intelligence" been a requirement to vote in England?

Simon Legree Jun 8th 2009 7:03 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 7645929)
For how long has being able to demonstrate "intelligence" been a requirement to vote in England?

Or in Canada for that matter !!!!!!

newshoney Jun 8th 2009 7:03 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 7645923)
And why is that a bad thing?

Surely, in a democracy, people may vote for whoever is on the ballet card. If that means that the person you didn't vote for wins, why does that mean that you are right and they were wrong?

I have never voted in my life and I never intend to. It never ceases to amaze me how those (that tend to be east of Alberta) constently criticise the governing party in Canada, claiming that all their supporters are too "right wing".

They may be too right wing for liberal supporters, but what makes the liberals correct and the right wing supporters wrong?

It seems that democracy is OK to liberals, provided they always win.

Indeed, there is no-one more sanctimonious. But these days the ideological differences between conservatives and liberals are too few to notice. At least in the UK, David Cameron has occupied the same middle ground as Tony Blair, so they are almost indistinguishable from each other. I don't know enough about the Canadian parties to offer an opinion.

All the same for those with a rose-tinted view of British socialism (I include the Labour Party in this broad definition) I recommend Nick Cohen's "What's Left" to debunk any romantic notions of leftist, liberal purity of thought.


Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 7645929)
For how long has being able to demonstrate "intelligence" been a requirement to vote in England?

Never, I believe. It used to be about class and money. Oh... and still is.

dbd33 Jun 8th 2009 7:04 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 7645923)
And why is that a bad thing?

I didn't say that it is a bad thing. I'm suggesting the presence of frothing loons in the Canadian parliament hasn't brought the country down and so a small vote for similar characters in the UK need not be cause for panic.

Almost Canadian Jun 8th 2009 7:10 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7645945)
I didn't say that it is a bad thing. I'm suggesting the presence of frothing loons in the Canadian parliament hasn't brought the country down and so a small vote for similar characters in the UK need not be cause for panic.

I am with you on that one:thumbsup:

Almost Canadian Jun 8th 2009 7:12 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by newshoney (Post 7645943)
Indeed, there is no-one more sanctimonious. But these days the ideological differences between conservatives and liberals are too few to notice. At least in the UK, David Cameron has occupied the same middle ground as Tony Blair, so they are almost indistinguishable from each other. I don't know enough about the Canadian parties to offer an opinion.

I thought that Blair aped the Tories prior to 1997 as, to do otherwise, meant that Labour were unelectable.


Originally Posted by newshoney (Post 7645943)
Never, I believe. It used to be about class and money. Oh... and still is.

Really, I thought one was entitled to vote irrespective of class and money in England (excepting all those in jail). Please explain.

rwin Jun 8th 2009 7:14 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 7645972)
Really, I thought one was entitled to vote irrespective of class and money in England (excepting all those in jail). Please explain.

But who can you vote for?

LondonPerth Jun 8th 2009 9:18 am

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by Simon Legree (Post 7645941)
Or in Canada for that matter !!!!!!

Or Australia.:lol:

Cape Blue Jun 8th 2009 11:02 am

Re: European Elections
 
I spoke to a few people who were voting UKIP because they would "get us out of Europe", when asked why we should be out of Europe the answers got a bit thinner - unelected bureaucrats, too many laws, should be trade only, immigration & Turkish and so on - nothing very coherent and mostly tinged with a little xenophobia (i.e. none could list any unelected bureaucrats, some mentioned weighing in lbs and ounces etc).

UKIP and BNP seem mostly a poorly considered protest vote sparked by MP's expenses etc, I wonder why the Torygraph didn't hold off on the Tory moats and duck houses until after the election?

I am not sure any government, regardless of flavor, can last longer than 10-12 years before they have annoyed enough of the electorate over something - people (esp brits) tend to remember the one thing they didn't agree with rather than the half a dozen they did, when it comes to voting time.

MarkG Jun 8th 2009 12:37 pm

Re: European Elections
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 7645849)
It's just a protest vote, the Canadian parliament still contains more hard right nutters than the British one.

Uh, the BNP are far _left_: what I've read of their policies wouldn't have been out of place in a Labour manifesto forty years ago.

They're sucking up disaffected Labour voters... disaffected Tories vote UKIP.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:42 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.