![]() |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8689302)
Yes I know. Read on beyond that and you'll see I explained myself and apologised.
The article is a load of Bollocks though. She is talking out of her arse if you ask me. My 7 year old son is dealing with all these complicated words now. It's just down to the parents to ensure they put the time and effort in. Is this women making excuses for the kids or the parents? |
Re: English Spelling
Interesting article - thanks for posting.
My 2¢. I've taught secondary English on both sides of the pond - can't say I've seen any big differences between pedagogy and student ability. An underlying problem re spelling (more specifically literacy) is a massive societal and educational problem, including: *Poor grounding in the parts of speech (K-4). *Low number of children reading - and generally poor readers at that. *Lack of writing with follow-up revision; both at school and at home. *Numerous distractions affecting studies and schooling (xbox/Teh Internez/DVD/TV/sports/shopping malls/part-time work). E-mail, chat, texting and twitter all shit on the English language. *Weakening schooling systems and teaching (i.e class size, teacher training (pedagogy), interfering bureaucracy, et al.). *An overemphasis upon math and science in school (I've never seen a colleague "mark" a math/science assignment/test for SP/PU/GRM). *Lazyness. *Chinglish instructions ;). *And the biggest problem: poor parenting. In these great democracies of Can/UK, parents have demanded and pressured kids, schools, instititutions to be more accepting and inclusive. Homogeneity and big-box blah average is the norm. Parents insist that their kids succeed regardless - regardless of the child's real ability, work ethic, and actual accomplishments. However, basic language skills aside, English is an evolving and changing language - maybe we are old school and can't adapt to the times? http://www.vertaalbureau-chinees.nl/...inglish032.jpg |
Re: English Spelling
1 Attachment(s)
this amused me and is vaguely related :)
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by dthomas
(Post 8689344)
*And the biggest problem: poor parenting. In these great democracies of Can/UK, parents have demanded and pressured kids, schools, instititutions to be more accepting and inclusive. Homogeneity and big-box blah average is the norm. Parents insist that their kids succeed regardless - regardless of the child's real ability, work ethic, and actual accomplishments.
However, basic language skills aside, English is an evolving and changing language - maybe we are old school and can't adapt to the times? If we rely on the schools to provide these skills alone, then we doing our kids a disservice. |
Re: English Spelling
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689298)
It's called Irony. That's in the English language too. It's a simple word, but the concept is clearly lost on so many people.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by dthomas
(Post 8689344)
Interesting article - thanks for posting.
My 2¢. I've taught secondary English on both sides of the pond - can't say I've seen any big differences between pedagogy and student ability. An underlying problem re spelling (more specifically literacy) is a massive societal and educational problem, including: *Poor grounding in the parts of speech (K-4). *Low number of children reading - and generally poor readers at that. *Lack of writing with follow-up revision; both at school and at home. *Numerous distractions affecting studies and schooling (xbox/Teh Internez/DVD/TV/sports/shopping malls/part-time work). E-mail, chat, texting and twitter all shit on the English language. *Weakening schooling systems and teaching (i.e class size, teacher training (pedagogy), interfering bureaucracy, et al.). *An overemphasis upon math and science in school (I've never seen a colleague "mark" a math/science assignment/test for SP/PU/GRM). *Lazyness. *Chinglish instructions ;). *And the biggest problem: poor parenting. In these great democracies of Can/UK, parents have demanded and pressured kids, schools, instititutions to be more accepting and inclusive. Homogeneity and big-box blah average is the norm. Parents insist that their kids succeed regardless - regardless of the child's real ability, work ethic, and actual accomplishments. However, basic language skills aside, English is an evolving and changing language - maybe we are old school and can't adapt to the times? http://www.vertaalbureau-chinees.nl/...inglish032.jpg <and a coat moment> |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8689386)
The author makes a similar assertion in his book. The study reveals similar findings to that of the article above. He elaborates by saying there is a strong correlation between the number of books in a home with the level of education of the parents. With more books being owned by the more educated parents. He then suggests that just filling your home with books will not guarantee a better educated child, but that this is affected by the level of education of the parent (i.e. their attitude towards education and the child inheriting the parents genes). The study in the Telegraph is suggesting that irrespective of a parents education, if they like to read and promote reading, this will have a positive impact on the child's own education. So in other words, just because somebody didn't go to university doesn't make them thick and unable, or unwilling, to make a positive contribution to their child's education by promoting reading in the home. Phew. I'm done writing now. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8689410)
Irony eh? Do reactionary rants about liberals and "doo gooders" get counted as that now-a-days?
Did you ever read Viz? The Modern Parents were a classic example of having a bash at liberal do gooders in a very ironic way. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689434)
The first part of his post used Irony. The second part was a bit of a rant, I grant you.
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689434)
However, I don't think the employment of irony is in any way dependent of the subject matter.
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689434)
Did you ever read Viz? The Modern Parents were a classic example of having a bash at liberal do gooders in a very ironic way.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689429)
Have you read Freakanomics?
The author makes a similar assertion in his book. The study reveals similar findings to that of the article above. He elaborates by saying there is a strong correlation between the number of books in a home with the level of education of the parents. With more books being owned by the more educated parents. He then suggests that just filling your home with books will not guarantee a better educated child, but that this is affected by the level of education of the parent (i.e. their attitude towards education and the child inheriting the parents genes). The study in the Telegraph is suggesting that irrespective of a parents education, if they like to read and promote reading, this will have a positive impact on the child's own education. So in other words, just because somebody didn't go to university doesn't make them thick and unable, or unwilling, to make a positive contribution to their child's education by promoting reading in the home. Phew. I'm done writing now. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8689445)
I am aware of the exploits of Malcolm and Cressida.
Then of course there was my favourite Sid the Sexist. I won't mention the two lovely ladies. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689464)
And little Tarquin. Then there was 'Spoiled Bastard'. Another fine example of how not to raise children.
Then of course there was my favourite Sid the Sexist. I won't mention the two lovely ladies. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Oink
(Post 8689461)
While in your first paragraph, the general, is true, the second is very rare. There is little debate that, in general, the the educational achievement level of parents will determine the educational achievement success of the child.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689477)
Agreed. But the study is suggesting that any parent, regardless of their level of education can make a positive impact on their child's education by promoting reading in the home. Of course the likelihood of this is probably far lower amongst the lesser educated parents.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:23 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.