![]() |
English Spelling
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8687594)
|
Re: English Spelling
[QUOTE=jimf;8687594]Is English spelling really that difficult?
I don't think so - Just my opinion :D....I think these problems have now surfaced due to "text speak". If u hve kids spellin like dis all the time, thy r going 2 strugle! I can't STAND it when someone sends an email or writes you a note with abbreviated spelling......drives me up the wall and one of the reasons I will not purchase my kids Cell phones yet....Im so mean! :lol: Just my tuppence worth.....:eek: |
Re: English Spelling
[QUOTE=NatsnSid;8687640]
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8687594)
Is English spelling really that difficult?
I don't think so - Just my opinion :D....I think these problems have now surfaced due to "text speak". If u hve kids spellin like dis all the time, thy r going 2 strugle! I can't STAND it when someone sends an email or writes you a note with abbreviated spelling......drives me up the wall and one of the reasons I will not purchase my kids Cell phones yet....Im so mean! :lol: Just my tuppence worth.....:eek: It made me understand why, at my school and of course other schools in England, we were given 10 spellings to learn every week......and we bloody learnt them and the difference between: enough borough bough borrow tough though thorough etc. etc. Is English not so phonetic or syllabic? YES. Can it be learnt properly with proper spelling? YES. |
Re: English Spelling
According to academics, children in Britain normally take three years to read to a decent standard. But in Finland – where words are more likely to be pronounced as they look – children can read fluently within three months. I don't see 'em queuing up to learn Finnish!:p |
Re: English Spelling
Agreed.
My Sister lives in Italy (about 30 minutes outside Ferrara) and I love the Italian language. Once you get the basics everything clicks. I may not be able to hold a lengthy conversation but I can understand the conversation around me and reply in disjointed sentences/words. (I used to stun my fluent Sister when I'd say "basta" when she was talking about me! haha). I hope the weather is lovely in Vicenza. N |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8687704)
If it's so bloody difficult why do so many people around the world speak English?
I don't see 'em queuing up to learn Finnish!:p |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8687709)
Not all of them speak it properly though but those that really study do a good job of it. In fact it's disgraceful to say that quite a few foreigners have a better grasp of the English language these days than many of those born and raised there.
I spent a few years in Switzerland as a kid, and got quite fluent in French and German. But everyone around us could speak Italian, German, French and English. I forgot my "foreign" languages when we moved back to the UK. Having taught for 10 years the biggest indicator of how quickly kids read and write is how many books the parents read, and whether they read to their kids. Charles Dickens managed to learn to write pretty well, and he was brought up in a boot blacking factory (not sure if that corroborates what I just said or not!)! |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8687719)
I thought kids were supposed to be getting smarter than the previous generation!
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by NatsnSid
(Post 8687706)
I hope the weather is lovely in Vicenza. N Anyway - I have more than the heat that is stopping me from going to bed tonight ...... I found a baby bat on my kitchen floor earlier and am still unsure what to do with it. There's a "helpful" thread in progress in 'The Lounge' part of the forum. P.S: Sorry folks for deviating - but the little bat is pressing on my conscience. |
Re: English Spelling
If the bat was outside, I would say leave it - hopefully it's mum would find it. Since it's inside.... maybe take it to a bat rescue society (:confused:). They're getting quite rare.
|
Re: English Spelling
Okay I may be missing the point here , but how can " the complexities of English spelling" be responsible for "increasing levels of illiteracy."
I don't believe the language has become more complex in recent years! What has changed is the teaching methodology, it's no longer accepted to teach by rote. Sometimes that's the only way to learn to spell certain words. Spelling was bound to suffer when marks are not deducted for incorrect spelling of words. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8687732)
If the bat was outside, I would say leave it - hopefully it's mum would find it. Since it's inside.... maybe take it to a bat rescue society (:confused:). They're getting quite rare.
The little bat was found on the kitchen floor - still is but in utility room now - and I'm not going anywhere at 1.13 am in the morning. I was on my way to bed when I found him/her but the lovely comments on the bat thread put paid to that. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Zoe Bell
(Post 8687748)
Okay I may be missing the point here , but how can " the complexities of English spelling" be responsible for "increasing levels of illiteracy."
I don't believe the language has become more complex in recent years! What has changed is the teaching methodology, it's no longer accepted to teach by rote. Sometimes that's the only way to learn to spell certain words. Spelling was bound to suffer when marks are not deducted for incorrect spelling of words. The complexities of English language have always been there but we were taught well weren't we? Even if it was by parrot method or goddamn learn your 10 spellings method. We did learn. And by golly we learnt the simple difference between there, their, and they're. The diffrerence bewteen accept and except. The way to write advice and advise. |
Re: English Spelling
English is simpler than other languages, there's no genders for words and you can completely mangle pronunciation and english speakers will still understand you.
The words given in the example on the article have similar sounds out of context but in a sentence they can sound different. Oh and removing all the different spellings kills off a lot of Puns. |
Re: English Spelling
I think that she is sooooo right & we should stop pushing kids so hard - they have to learn sooo much and we all no that learning can't be fun - they should be playing computer games, hanging round street corners, taking / selling drugs, etc. The only skill you need for this is Maths (adding, subtraction and multiplying so that you can work out how much you have to pay and receive - understanding gross and net is good as if you don't your dealer might break your legs).
The antique, inconsistent English spelling system is indeed probably the main reason why the UK has more educational underachievement than any other European country. A spelling system that has naturally evolved over centuries should be changed to suit the new generation. We could also burn all the history books as it takes so long to learn about it and when you do it is all out of date. :rofl: Alternatively it might be cos of liberals like her excusing the inadequacies of the current crop of children and some of their teachers (not all of them but just those who share her such misguided beliefs) that achieve success in any area of life is not as a consequence of either be gifted, willing to work hard or just being extremely lucky. The way that we test and measure children in the UK doesn't help as we have now got a system which lowers the benchmark so that those who would have previously excelled might become bored and thus distracted. The one thing I remember from my childhood is if I misbehaved and someone asked me why, I never said the real reason as I figured out that it was easy to use an excuse that a liberal doo gooder would then allow me off scot free without any consequence other than having to hug a few trees. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Yelkcub
(Post 8687783)
I think that she is sooooo right & we should stop pushing kids so hard - they have to learn sooo much and we all no that learning can't be fun - they should be playing computer games, hanging round street corners, taking / selling drugs, etc. The only skill you need for this is Maths (adding, subtraction and multiplying so that you can work out how much you have to pay and receive - understanding gross and net is good as if you don't your dealer might break your legs).
The antique, inconsistent English spelling system is indeed probably the main reason why the UK has more educational underachievement than any other European country. A spelling system that has naturally evolved over centuries should be changed to suit the new generation. We could also burn all the history books as it takes so long to learn about it and when you do it is all out of date. :rofl: Alternatively it might be cos of liberals like her excusing the inadequacies of the current crop of children and some of their teachers (not all of them but just those who share her such misguided beliefs) that achieve success in any area of life is not as a consequence of either be gifted, willing to work hard or just being extremely lucky. The way that we test and measure children in the UK doesn't help as we have now got a system which lowers the benchmark so that those who would have previously excelled might become bored and thus distracted. The one thing I remember from my childhood is if I misbehaved and someone asked me why, I never said the real reason as I figured out that it was easy to use an excuse that a liberal doo gooder would then allow me off scot free without any consequence other than having to hug a few trees. Is that English enough for you? |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8687594)
That article was a waste of paper space! |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8687791)
I know you're talking as much rubbish as the woman in the article. If you want to be serious then be so - if not - shut up.
Is that English enough for you? Is that plain enough English for you? |
Re: English Spelling
It is English enough yes. Did I go a little off tangent? Yes. I still think your talk of computer games and learning maths to sell drugs is rubbish though. I presume you were being sarcastic.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Zoe Bell
(Post 8687748)
Okay I may be missing the point here , but how can " the complexities of English spelling" be responsible for "increasing levels of illiteracy."
I don't believe the language has become more complex in recent years! What has changed is the teaching methodology, it's no longer accepted to teach by rote. Sometimes that's the only way to learn to spell certain words. Spelling was bound to suffer when marks are not deducted for incorrect spelling of words. Masha Bell has form in the "simplify spelling" movement. It's a familiar hobby horse of a few (IMHO very misguided) individuals who seem to me to be far keener on excusing the appalling spelling of children rather than addressing the fundamental failings of the spell-as-you-speak ideology. "Simplifying" or systematising spelling would not only destroy the etymological links English has with its donor languages, it would also by extension make it even more difficult for English speakers to learn a second (European) language if those linkages are removed. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8688491)
It is English enough yes. Did I go a little off tangent? Yes. I still think your talk of computer games and learning maths to sell drugs is rubbish though. I presume you were being sarcastic.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 8689045)
Did you actually read his whole post? I'm surprised you couldn't see the bulge his tongue made in his cheek from all the way over there in Italy.... :p
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8689065)
I did but I had the jitters and was writing on another thread at the same time and I wasn't concentrating properly. It was very late as well and I was knackered.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 8689076)
Seeing as how we're such lovely people over here in Canadianland, we'll forgive you your lack of concentration this once. Especially since you appear to have avoided any heinous crimes against spelling and grammar, despite your knackeredness ;)
Thank you lovely people in Canadianland for your forgiveness. I'll try not to be so crass in the future. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by CanadaJimmy
(Post 8687775)
English is simpler than other languages, there's no genders for words and you can completely mangle pronunciation and english speakers will still understand you.
The words given in the example on the article have similar sounds out of context but in a sentence they can sound different. Oh and removing all the different spellings kills off a lot of Puns. |
Re: English Spelling
[QUOTE=Lorna at Vicenza;8687667]
Originally Posted by NatsnSid
(Post 8687640)
I have 2 kids growing up in Italy and have followed the way they were taught Italian. It really is all about phonetics and syllables and sounds and they never change and you are taught this and you can then read every word in Italian. It's true.
It made me understand why, at my school and of course other schools in England, we were given 10 spellings to learn every week......and we bloody learnt them and the difference between: enough borough bough borrow tough though thorough etc. etc. Is English not so phonetic or syllabic? YES. Can it be learnt properly with proper spelling? YES. |
Re: English Spelling
[QUOTE=Souvy;8689209]
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8687667)
You are right in this. You can only know how to pronounce those words if you have learned them by heart. This is not confined to English. I have had discussions in the past with my OH regarding masculine and feminine nouns in French. You can't guess at the gender of a noun because there are no rules. You pick it up as you go along. A good way to remember, apparently, is to attach the noun to an adjective. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8687791)
I know you're talking as much rubbish as the woman in the article. If you want to be serious then be so - if not - shut up.
Is that English enough for you? |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689298)
It's called Irony. That's in the English language too. It's a simple word, but the concept is clearly lost on so many people.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Lorna at Vicenza
(Post 8689302)
Yes I know. Read on beyond that and you'll see I explained myself and apologised.
The article is a load of Bollocks though. She is talking out of her arse if you ask me. My 7 year old son is dealing with all these complicated words now. It's just down to the parents to ensure they put the time and effort in. Is this women making excuses for the kids or the parents? |
Re: English Spelling
Interesting article - thanks for posting.
My 2¢. I've taught secondary English on both sides of the pond - can't say I've seen any big differences between pedagogy and student ability. An underlying problem re spelling (more specifically literacy) is a massive societal and educational problem, including: *Poor grounding in the parts of speech (K-4). *Low number of children reading - and generally poor readers at that. *Lack of writing with follow-up revision; both at school and at home. *Numerous distractions affecting studies and schooling (xbox/Teh Internez/DVD/TV/sports/shopping malls/part-time work). E-mail, chat, texting and twitter all shit on the English language. *Weakening schooling systems and teaching (i.e class size, teacher training (pedagogy), interfering bureaucracy, et al.). *An overemphasis upon math and science in school (I've never seen a colleague "mark" a math/science assignment/test for SP/PU/GRM). *Lazyness. *Chinglish instructions ;). *And the biggest problem: poor parenting. In these great democracies of Can/UK, parents have demanded and pressured kids, schools, instititutions to be more accepting and inclusive. Homogeneity and big-box blah average is the norm. Parents insist that their kids succeed regardless - regardless of the child's real ability, work ethic, and actual accomplishments. However, basic language skills aside, English is an evolving and changing language - maybe we are old school and can't adapt to the times? http://www.vertaalbureau-chinees.nl/...inglish032.jpg |
Re: English Spelling
1 Attachment(s)
this amused me and is vaguely related :)
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by dthomas
(Post 8689344)
*And the biggest problem: poor parenting. In these great democracies of Can/UK, parents have demanded and pressured kids, schools, instititutions to be more accepting and inclusive. Homogeneity and big-box blah average is the norm. Parents insist that their kids succeed regardless - regardless of the child's real ability, work ethic, and actual accomplishments.
However, basic language skills aside, English is an evolving and changing language - maybe we are old school and can't adapt to the times? If we rely on the schools to provide these skills alone, then we doing our kids a disservice. |
Re: English Spelling
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689298)
It's called Irony. That's in the English language too. It's a simple word, but the concept is clearly lost on so many people.
|
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by dthomas
(Post 8689344)
Interesting article - thanks for posting.
My 2¢. I've taught secondary English on both sides of the pond - can't say I've seen any big differences between pedagogy and student ability. An underlying problem re spelling (more specifically literacy) is a massive societal and educational problem, including: *Poor grounding in the parts of speech (K-4). *Low number of children reading - and generally poor readers at that. *Lack of writing with follow-up revision; both at school and at home. *Numerous distractions affecting studies and schooling (xbox/Teh Internez/DVD/TV/sports/shopping malls/part-time work). E-mail, chat, texting and twitter all shit on the English language. *Weakening schooling systems and teaching (i.e class size, teacher training (pedagogy), interfering bureaucracy, et al.). *An overemphasis upon math and science in school (I've never seen a colleague "mark" a math/science assignment/test for SP/PU/GRM). *Lazyness. *Chinglish instructions ;). *And the biggest problem: poor parenting. In these great democracies of Can/UK, parents have demanded and pressured kids, schools, instititutions to be more accepting and inclusive. Homogeneity and big-box blah average is the norm. Parents insist that their kids succeed regardless - regardless of the child's real ability, work ethic, and actual accomplishments. However, basic language skills aside, English is an evolving and changing language - maybe we are old school and can't adapt to the times? http://www.vertaalbureau-chinees.nl/...inglish032.jpg <and a coat moment> |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8689386)
The author makes a similar assertion in his book. The study reveals similar findings to that of the article above. He elaborates by saying there is a strong correlation between the number of books in a home with the level of education of the parents. With more books being owned by the more educated parents. He then suggests that just filling your home with books will not guarantee a better educated child, but that this is affected by the level of education of the parent (i.e. their attitude towards education and the child inheriting the parents genes). The study in the Telegraph is suggesting that irrespective of a parents education, if they like to read and promote reading, this will have a positive impact on the child's own education. So in other words, just because somebody didn't go to university doesn't make them thick and unable, or unwilling, to make a positive contribution to their child's education by promoting reading in the home. Phew. I'm done writing now. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8689410)
Irony eh? Do reactionary rants about liberals and "doo gooders" get counted as that now-a-days?
Did you ever read Viz? The Modern Parents were a classic example of having a bash at liberal do gooders in a very ironic way. |
Re: English Spelling
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689434)
The first part of his post used Irony. The second part was a bit of a rant, I grant you.
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689434)
However, I don't think the employment of irony is in any way dependent of the subject matter.
Originally Posted by John_B
(Post 8689434)
Did you ever read Viz? The Modern Parents were a classic example of having a bash at liberal do gooders in a very ironic way.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:12 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.