Don't understand why Albertans aren't more outraged by this
#16
sooo, you're all ok with RCMP bombing an installation then trying to pin it on a local farmer, in cahoots with an energy company? I'm seriously asking because that seems like an incredibly corrupt, nasty thing to do for a so-called police force.
"
Their lawyer produced evidence that the RCMP bombed a wellsite and that they did it with the full support of the energy company that owned it. The Crown admits the allegations are true. "
It's okay that fish are deformed?
That there are higher rates of cancer?
They had the woman with the gassy water on the CEEB yesterday. She's an actual scientist as well as a farmer, which is a bummer for the company that is fracking nearby. The kind of intimidation she's had to deal with from the firm involved as well as the Albertan government is pretty crazy. The water was so foul, that even her dogs refused to drink it.
I mean, if they can do that to rural communities, they can do that to you too, in your safe little suburbs.
"
Their lawyer produced evidence that the RCMP bombed a wellsite and that they did it with the full support of the energy company that owned it. The Crown admits the allegations are true. "
It's okay that fish are deformed?
That there are higher rates of cancer?
They had the woman with the gassy water on the CEEB yesterday. She's an actual scientist as well as a farmer, which is a bummer for the company that is fracking nearby. The kind of intimidation she's had to deal with from the firm involved as well as the Albertan government is pretty crazy. The water was so foul, that even her dogs refused to drink it.
I mean, if they can do that to rural communities, they can do that to you too, in your safe little suburbs.
Deformed fish & cancer... like I said, the bitumen has been leaching into the river for centuries. It's not new, though I'll concede that the initial developments from the 60s/70s didn't give any care for the environment - but that was also a standard global attitude. I assure you that you cannot take or return as much as one litre of water from a watercourse without the verification and approval of the governmental authorities.
Incidentally, I assume you own things like mobile phones, laptops, iPods... or are only some environmental disasters cool enough to protest about?
#17
Thread Starter
slanderer of the innocent










Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC











Police corruption is not a uniquely Albertan phenomenon, in fact I'd say it's the global norm. Therefore it doesn't particularly raise eyebrows anywhere.
Deformed fish & cancer... like I said, the bitumen has been leaching into the river for centuries. It's not new, though I'll concede that the initial developments from the 60s/70s didn't give any care for the environment - but that was also a standard global attitude. I assure you that you cannot take or return as much as one litre of water from a watercourse without the verification and approval of the governmental authorities.
Incidentally, I assume you own things like mobile phones, laptops, iPods... or are only some environmental disasters cool enough to protest about?
Deformed fish & cancer... like I said, the bitumen has been leaching into the river for centuries. It's not new, though I'll concede that the initial developments from the 60s/70s didn't give any care for the environment - but that was also a standard global attitude. I assure you that you cannot take or return as much as one litre of water from a watercourse without the verification and approval of the governmental authorities.
Incidentally, I assume you own things like mobile phones, laptops, iPods... or are only some environmental disasters cool enough to protest about?
#18
There are deformed fish all over the world. Correlation is not causation.
There are always higher rates of cancer. Finding 'cancer clusters' is trivial. Correlation is not causation.
If someone actually proved that these things were causing cancer and deformed fish, we might be concerned. Until that happens, correlation is still not causation, and knee-jerk 'do something' reactions have caused far more harm than waiting for someone to actually figure out whether there's a problem.
Fracking typically occurs well below the water table, so there's no known mechamism for it to cause this. There are plenty of places with methane in the water already, from purely natural sources.
That there are higher rates of cancer?
If someone actually proved that these things were causing cancer and deformed fish, we might be concerned. Until that happens, correlation is still not causation, and knee-jerk 'do something' reactions have caused far more harm than waiting for someone to actually figure out whether there's a problem.
They had the woman with the gassy water on the CEEB yesterday. She's an actual scientist as well as a farmer, which is a bummer for the company that is fracking nearby.
#19
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/rcmp-b...paign-1.188599
The Mounties bombed an oil installation as part of a dirty tricks campaign in their investigation into sabotage in the Alberta's oil patch.
The Mounties bombed an oil installation as part of a dirty tricks campaign in their investigation into sabotage in the Alberta's oil patch.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...ling-1.1387795
Ernst says there was so much methane in her tap water as a result of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, that she could set fire to the water.
Ernst says there was so much methane in her tap water as a result of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, that she could set fire to the water.
Levels of contaminants higher than in some of the world's most polluted cities have been found downwind of Canada's largest oil, gas and tar sands processing zone, in a rural area where men suffer elevated rates of cancers linked to such chemicals.
A new study has found heightened levels of cancer-causing chemicals traced to Alberta's oilsands developments in lakes surrounding Fort McMurray (lower right in this Google satellite map image), including Lake Namur, marked by the A. (Google Maps)
The study found that the levels of PAHs in all six lakes had increased anywhere from 2½ times to 23 times background levels in the early 1960s, before the start of oilsands mining in the region
The study found that the levels of PAHs in all six lakes had increased anywhere from 2½ times to 23 times background levels in the early 1960s, before the start of oilsands mining in the region
A renowned Alberta water scientist is urging the federal government to take action after he discovered deformities in fish in the Athabasca River downriver from oil sands developments bear a striking resemblance to ones found in fish after spills in U.S. waters.
#20
sooo, you're all ok with RCMP bombing an installation then trying to pin it on a local farmer, in cahoots with an energy company? I'm seriously asking because that seems like an incredibly corrupt, nasty thing to do for a so-called police force.
"
Their lawyer produced evidence that the RCMP bombed a wellsite and that they did it with the full support of the energy company that owned it. The Crown admits the allegations are true. "
"
Their lawyer produced evidence that the RCMP bombed a wellsite and that they did it with the full support of the energy company that owned it. The Crown admits the allegations are true. "
They had the woman with the gassy water on the CEEB yesterday. She's an actual scientist as well as a farmer, which is a bummer for the company that is fracking nearby. The kind of intimidation she's had to deal with from the firm involved as well as the Albertan government is pretty crazy. The water was so foul, that even her dogs refused to drink it.
I mean, if they can do that to rural communities, they can do that to you too, in your safe little suburbs.
I mean, if they can do that to rural communities, they can do that to you too, in your safe little suburbs.
There's plenty of foul water in Alberta, it's a semi-arid environment.
The only way that would happen is through negligence, okay if the company is negligent, have at it but it's not some general thing to be worried about.
#23
ahh ExKiwiLass at it again...so much rage!
is this you EKL?
is this you EKL?
#24
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710











#25
BE Forum Addict







Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710











OK, so the first happened in 1999, so it is fairly outrageous, but hardly current
Fracking and Rosebud all seems a bit of a tragedy to me and points to higher regulation of fracking and better record keeping. I am not sure whether anything has changed for that. But they frack in BC too!
Horrors happened in the early oilsand years , just as they did in the early nuclear years in UK (and in fact many industries everywhere, I suspect the pulp industry of BC too). They built a tailings pond in the river which is terrible BUT Nowadays regulations are way way tougher and there is so much (effective) work to prevent process affected water going off site, with a lot of monitoring and regulation. Its tragic they did what they did in the 60s, but that's not uniquely Albertan and would be applicable all over BC with tailings.
Air pollution and air pollution getting into water ways is still potentially an issue; but the reality is all development could stop and still those lake levels you mention would be high because of what went on 30-50 years ago and has simply stopped going on now.
Fracking and Rosebud all seems a bit of a tragedy to me and points to higher regulation of fracking and better record keeping. I am not sure whether anything has changed for that. But they frack in BC too!
Horrors happened in the early oilsand years , just as they did in the early nuclear years in UK (and in fact many industries everywhere, I suspect the pulp industry of BC too). They built a tailings pond in the river which is terrible BUT Nowadays regulations are way way tougher and there is so much (effective) work to prevent process affected water going off site, with a lot of monitoring and regulation. Its tragic they did what they did in the 60s, but that's not uniquely Albertan and would be applicable all over BC with tailings.
Air pollution and air pollution getting into water ways is still potentially an issue; but the reality is all development could stop and still those lake levels you mention would be high because of what went on 30-50 years ago and has simply stopped going on now.
#26
Thread Starter
slanderer of the innocent










Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC











Well, I guess if denial pays the bills, then denial it is.
#27
Albertans I know complain about water being smelly after fracking but don't do anything about it, it's a it is what it is scenario. If it doesn't affect their daily lives oh well.
We spoke to our neighbors before getting a water treatment system installed and apparently when they built the house the well water was lovely, then along came the oil companies and did some fracking, we believe they got paid out.
Apparently Alberta has a higher than average digestive (bowel, stomach, intestine etc) system cancer rate
We spoke to our neighbors before getting a water treatment system installed and apparently when they built the house the well water was lovely, then along came the oil companies and did some fracking, we believe they got paid out.
Apparently Alberta has a higher than average digestive (bowel, stomach, intestine etc) system cancer rate
#28
Thread Starter
slanderer of the innocent










Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC











Albertans I know complain about water being smelly after fracking but don't do anything about it, it's a it is what it is scenario. If it doesn't affect their daily lives oh well.
We spoke to our neighbors before getting a water treatment system installed and apparently when they built the house the well water was lovely, then along came the oil companies and did some fracking, we believe they got paid out.
Apparently Alberta has a higher than average digestive (bowel, stomach, intestine etc) system cancer rate
We spoke to our neighbors before getting a water treatment system installed and apparently when they built the house the well water was lovely, then along came the oil companies and did some fracking, we believe they got paid out.
Apparently Alberta has a higher than average digestive (bowel, stomach, intestine etc) system cancer rate
yeah, it's the 'it is what it is' thing I don't get. It's just so sad. It was heartbreaking listening to the story of Rosebud - really heartbreaking, those people have lost everything. Without decent water you really have nothing, doesn't matter how much land you have or how pretty it is. She sounds like she has had a really rough time from both teh government and the company - refusing to test her water, refusing to talk to her, stonewalling etc. etc.
#29
Thread Starter
slanderer of the innocent










Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,695
From: Vancouver, BC











FWIW, I wish none of the environmental degradation studies were true. I wish we could oil & gas ourselves up the wazoo and it not matter one iota to the planet. It would be waaaay easier for all of us, let's face it.
#30
One web article said that Canada has no environmental water standards...is that true ?



