Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > The Maple Leaf
Reload this Page >

Does Lukiwski need to go?

Wikiposts

Does Lukiwski need to go?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:05 pm
  #46  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,015
Purley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond reputePurley has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Yeah - its either db33 or a troll. Someone is 'avin' us on I fink!!
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:13 pm
  #47  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Thorstien is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by bazzz
What, so sex is only good for breeding? Does having a vasectomy make me mentally ill?

Anyway, so much for your laws:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7330196.stm
The news story that link goes to just confirms how broken homes and immoral upbringing produces sexually confused teens that end up gay or going for a sex change. The society today would have a boy act like a girl or vice versa, instead of instilling the proper sexual roles upon the children. the human genome is unbiased towards sexuality, but it does control wether you are male or female. and if you are born a male, a man you should be. not some poor bloke who is made to think that he should be a woman because his penis is to small, or mabye he was taught to love his daddy the wrong way. sexual orentation starts in child hood, and if you tell the child they can be whatever sex they want, they will be confused and choose what they think you want them to be, instead of just being what they are
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:24 pm
  #48  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,715
hot wasabi peas is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

I wish I was gay cos I'm a lesbian magnet. Unfortuantely my troubled family life likely turned me straight... very straight... so straight that I don't mind boy dogs humping my leg.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:27 pm
  #49  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
The news story that link goes to just confirms how broken homes and immoral upbringing produces sexually confused teens that end up gay or going for a sex change. The society today would have a boy act like a girl or vice versa, instead of instilling the proper sexual roles upon the children. the human genome is unbiased towards sexuality, but it does control wether you are male or female. and if you are born a male, a man you should be. not some poor bloke who is made to think that he should be a woman because his penis is to small, or mabye he was taught to love his daddy the wrong way. sexual orentation starts in child hood, and if you tell the child they can be whatever sex they want, they will be confused and choose what they think you want them to be, instead of just being what they are
The clarity, the clarity! PM me Thor baby, I'll rock your world and God be my judge.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:34 pm
  #50  
dbd33's Avatar
Assimilated Pauper
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 40,070
From: Ontario
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by lizwil98
Yeah - its either db33 or a troll. Someone is 'avin' us on I fink!!
Not me mate. I can't say I've heard of Mr. Lukiwski but I'd think that as a Conservative he's obliged to be at least mildly homophobic. I don't suppose Thorstien's views on faggotry clash strongly with those of Preston Manning or Steven Harper.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:38 pm
  #51  
windward's Avatar
Islander
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 953
From: Toronto, woo!
windward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to allwindward is a name known to all
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Wow... I came back to the thread to point out that the Toronto Star has a poll about this guy and find this. Wonderful.

http://www.thestar.com/#

'Is an apology sufficient?'

66%/33% To the forgive-and-forgets or anti-limp-wrist brigade, or whatever their reasons when I submitted.

Originally Posted by bazzz View Post
What, so sex is only good for breeding? Does having a vasectomy make me mentally ill?
Well that is the primary reason to have sex is it not?
.. Not for me it's not. Contraception ftw.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:45 pm
  #52  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by dbd33
Not me mate. I can't say I've heard of Mr. Lukiwski but I'd think that as a Conservative he's obliged to be at least mildly homophobic. I don't suppose Thorstien's views on faggotry clash strongly with those of Preston Manning or Steven Harper.
Oh really! Mr. Lukiwski has been a household word for ....... hours, at least.

If Thorstien is not you, then maybe Stockwell Day's meds have run low?
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:49 pm
  #53  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Thorstien is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

well it's been a blast, but I've more pressing matters than discussing homosexuality and politicians, and theroies of how the politicain became gay. lol. Final note- Keep Lukiwski, let him fix his mistakes, and vote for a better MP next election.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:55 pm
  #54  
gingnut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Always lurking.
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 410
From: My second Choice.
gingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
The news story that link goes to just confirms how broken homes and immoral upbringing produces sexually confused teens that end up gay or going for a sex change. The society today would have a boy act like a girl or vice versa, instead of instilling the proper sexual roles upon the children. the human genome is unbiased towards sexuality, but it does control wether you are male or female. and if you are born a male, a man you should be. not some poor bloke who is made to think that he should be a woman because his penis is to small, or mabye he was taught to love his daddy the wrong way. sexual orentation starts in child hood, and if you tell the child they can be whatever sex they want, they will be confused and choose what they think you want them to be, instead of just being what they are
Can I guess that you are making these posts too prove just how offensive Lukiwski's remarks were? If you are than I do see your side of the argument. However have not changed my position. If you actually believe this crap then maybe if will help you get fast tracked in to Canada considering the current government! BTW there are several species of animals that do have intercorse with the same sex, saw it on a documentry once. I would get some examples but I haven't activated my parental controls yet and am not brave enough to google "homosexuality in the wild"

Originally Posted by windward
Wow... I came back to the thread to point out that the Toronto Star has a poll about this guy and find this. Wonderful.

http://www.thestar.com/#

'Is an apology sufficient?'

66%/33% To the forgive-and-forgets or anti-limp-wrist brigade, or whatever their reasons when I submitted.



.. Not for me it's not. Contraception ftw.
Just because some say Lukwiski should not have to resign does not mean we agree with the sentiments of what was said by him. Not being in SK you may not understand that this was done by a desperate provincial NDP gov(who I actually voted for this last election) that lost and now wants to discredit the Sask Party that is in power. Now the federal opposition parties are jumping on this too send the message that the conservative party of today are just the same rednecks from out west that were in the REEEFOOORM party. Maybe the forgive and forgets are just jaded by the Gotcha! mentality of politics. If the comments were made 1 year go or made in public I might be less forgiving.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:55 pm
  #55  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
well it's been a blast, but I've more pressing matters than discussing homosexuality and politicians, and theroies of how the politicain became gay. lol. Final note- Keep Lukiwski, let him fix his mistakes, and vote for a better MP next election.
Not Quo, surely?
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:57 pm
  #56  
dbd33's Avatar
Assimilated Pauper
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 40,070
From: Ontario
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by gingnut
Can I guess that you are making these posts too prove just how offensive Lukiwski's remarks were? If you are than I do see your side of the argument. However have not changed my position. If you actually believe this crap then maybe if will help you get fast tracked in to Canada considering the current government! BTW there are several species of animals that do have intercorse with the same sex, saw it on a documentry once. I would get some examples but I haven't activated my parental controls yet and am not brave enough to google "homosexuality in the wild"

Just because some say Lukwiski should not have to resign does not mean we agree with the sentiments of what was said by him. Not being in SK you may not understand that this was done by a desperate provincial NDP gov(who I actually voted for this last election) that lost and now wants to discredit the Sask Party that is in power. Now the federal opposition parties are jumping on this too send the message that the conservative party of today are just the same rednecks from out west that were in the REEEFOOORM party. Maybe the forgive and forgets are just jaded by the Gotcha! mentality of politics. If the comments were made 1 year go or made in public I might be less forgiving.

Giraffes. Always at it.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 12:59 pm
  #57  
gingnut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Always lurking.
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 410
From: My second Choice.
gingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Can't trust anything with a neck that long!
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 1:00 pm
  #58  
Lorna_D's Avatar
Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,885
From: Regina Beach, Saskatchewan
Lorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
well it's been a blast, but I've more pressing matters than discussing homosexuality and politicians, and theroies of how the politicain became gay. lol. Final note- Keep Lukiwski, let him fix his mistakes, and vote for a better MP next election.
So go on, do tell, did you break the record for how long can I be a troll before the mods kick me off?
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 1:02 pm
  #59  
dbd33's Avatar
Assimilated Pauper
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 40,070
From: Ontario
dbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond reputedbd33 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by gingnut
Can't trust anything with a neck that long!
Rather a shame they're not lesbians really.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 1:05 pm
  #60  
gingnut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Always lurking.
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 410
From: My second Choice.
gingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by dbd33
Rather a shame they're not lesbians really.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.