Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > The Maple Leaf
Reload this Page >

Does Lukiwski need to go?

Wikiposts

Does Lukiwski need to go?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 10:51 am
  #31  
mandymoochops's Avatar
Sawdust making harpy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,291
From: Alberta
mandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
Why don't you people reply with an argumentive debate in stead of childish insults. I am entiled to my views and opinions just as you are. I never said that I don't care about or hate homosexuals. they should be treated like any other mentally ill patient. I have no problem with two queers bangin' each other. I also have no problem with you slitting your wrists. All I'm saying is that both actions are NOT NATURAL.
How can you have an arguementative debate (those two words say it all really - inciting something perchance) when you know full well that everyone on here will disagree with you? If you had many differing views and opinions then yes you can have a debate. If you have one that is going to whip up the hornets nest what do you expect?

And natural in one mans eyes is not natural in anothers - you have just got to accept that. Smae with paedophiles, I would readily hang draw and quater every last one of them, but in their own eyes they are doing what they feel they need to.

Now in your last post about voting for one - Paedophilia is ILLEGAL - homosexuality is not, alcohol impares your reasonable judgement - homosexuality does not, depression is a confirmed mental illness, and guess what........................
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 10:53 am
  #32  
gingnut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Always lurking.
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 410
From: My second Choice.
gingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of lightgingnut is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
Why don't you people reply with an argumentive debate in stead of childish insults. I am entiled to my views and opinions just as you are. I never said that I don't care about or hate homosexuals. they should be treated like any other mentally ill patient. I have no problem with two queers bangin' each other. I also have no problem with you slitting your wrists. All I'm saying is that both actions are NOT NATURAL.
1st it has been proving by the psychiatric community that homosexuality is not a mental illness, after spending a century trying to find a cure. But I think this video sums it up best. http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=JOdoabbLBcE
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 10:53 am
  #33  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,020
bazzz is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by mandymoochops
alcohol impares your reasonable judgement - homosexuality does not,
Huh. A gay friend of mine has made some very unwise decisions when confronted with a rippling torso and a massive cock. (Not mine).
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 10:55 am
  #34  
macadian's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,466
From: Formally Scotland. Now Bay of Quinte...Ontario
macadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

PMSL

Classic!
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 10:55 am
  #35  
mandymoochops's Avatar
Sawdust making harpy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,291
From: Alberta
mandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by bazzz
Huh. A gay friend of mine has made some very unwise decisions when confronted with a rippling torso and a massive cock. (Not mine).

Haven't we all
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 10:59 am
  #36  
Lorna_D's Avatar
Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,885
From: Regina Beach, Saskatchewan
Lorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond reputeLorna_D has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by mandymoochops
Haven't we all
surely that's for another forum
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:01 am
  #37  
mandymoochops's Avatar
Sawdust making harpy
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11,291
From: Alberta
mandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond reputemandymoochops has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Lorna_D
surely that's for another forum
Couldn't help myself, seriously though i'm sure everyone knows what I mean regarding that impaired judgement statement though - I can't put it across as well as some would thats all
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:03 am
  #38  
macadian's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,466
From: Formally Scotland. Now Bay of Quinte...Ontario
macadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Lorna_D
surely that's for another forum
Why? You think they might be missing out
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:07 am
  #39  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Thorstien is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Anyhow, to keep in topic, keep the politician. those comments are fifteen years old. surely his views have changed a little since then. Also people should really stop applying their throw away the bad MP routine. every time some MP makes a mistake you get rid of them. Why vote at all if you can't have faith in the guy you voted for? let the MP fix his error before you get rid of him\her. Every human makes an error, it only becomes a mistake if you refuse to fix it. There are politicatins that have wasted billions of dollars, destroyed huge enviromental resources, closed hundreds of schools, yet they are still in office. Yet you are going to fire this one because of comments made fifteen years ago that were not so unpopular back then? "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." You should get real.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:10 am
  #40  
macadian's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,466
From: Formally Scotland. Now Bay of Quinte...Ontario
macadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond reputemacadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
Anyhow, to keep in topic, keep the politician. those comments are fifteen years old. surely his views have changed a little since then. Also people should really stop applying their throw away the bad MP routine. every time some MP makes a mistake you get rid of them. Why vote at all if you can't have faith in the guy you voted for? let the MP fix his error before you get rid of him\her. Every human makes an error, it only becomes a mistake if you refuse to fix it. There are politicatins that have wasted billions of dollars, destroyed huge enviromental resources, closed hundreds of schools, yet they are still in office. Yet you are going to fire this one because of comments made fifteen years ago that were not so unpopular back then? "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." You should get real.
Amen to that!
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:14 am
  #41  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Thorstien is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by mandymoochops
How can you have an arguementative debate (those two words say it all really - inciting something perchance) when you know full well that everyone on here will disagree with you? If you had many differing views and opinions then yes you can have a debate. If you have one that is going to whip up the hornets nest what do you expect?

And natural in one mans eyes is not natural in anothers - you have just got to accept that. Smae with paedophiles, I would readily hang draw and quater every last one of them, but in their own eyes they are doing what they feel they need to.

Now in your last post about voting for one - Paedophilia is ILLEGAL - homosexuality is not, alcohol impares your reasonable judgement - homosexuality does not, depression is a confirmed mental illness, and guess what........................
oooo the LAW!! man's law has changed more often in history than any other aspect of humanity. It will change again, and again and then again!!!
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:30 am
  #42  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Thorstien is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:38 am
  #43  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,020
bazzz is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.
What, so sex is only good for breeding? Does having a vasectomy make me mentally ill?

Anyway, so much for your laws:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7330196.stm
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:52 am
  #44  
Just Joined
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 26
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Thorstien is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by bazzz
What, so sex is only good for breeding? Does having a vasectomy make me mentally ill?

Anyway, so much for your laws:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7330196.stm
Well that is the primary reason to have sex is it not? the fact that it is pleasurable just ensures copulation and procreation. just because homosexuality is not a proven mental disease does not mean it is the natural thing to do. It dosn't matter much because homos can't breed anyway. that so called "man" was a woman first, he\she always had an uterus.

Last edited by Thorstien; Apr 4th 2008 at 11:57 am.
 
Old Apr 4th 2008 | 11:54 am
  #45  
Novocastrian's Avatar
Born again atheist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,259
From: Europe (to be specified).
Novocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond reputeNovocastrian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?

Originally Posted by Thorstien
There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.
dbd33? I thought you were washing your hair tonight?
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.