![]() |
Canada to rejoin British Empire?
It looks like it.
Last month the government announced the reintroduction of the terms Royal Canadian Navy and Royal Canadian Airforce. They were dropped in the 1960s. Yesterday I read that all Canadian diplomatic missions are to now display pictures of the Queen. She is admittedly the head of state but it looks like a step backwards for a country that has spent decades trying to establish its own identity. |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
The first gift the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge brought us from their recent visit to Canada!
|
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Edo
(Post 9609714)
The first gift the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge brought us from their recent visit to Canada!
|
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
I wasn't aware we'd ever 'left' the British Empire. When the armed forces unified in '68 and the navy and airforce lost the Royal designation every other corps kept their names. The ships were still called HMCS and still are, Royal Canadian Artillery, etc - none of that changed. Hat badges still have the crown on them and the Governor General is still in place as the Queen's representative in Canada, to whom the PM must go for permission to suspend/prorogue parliament/democracy and likely for a number of other things. I know that after unification in '70 thrrough '73 Canadian soldiers still swore their oath to the Queen and even though our constitution was repatriated in '81 I'd be surprised if they still don't. The statutes governing the military in Canada (as taught in basic training) were Queen's Regulations And Orders and I'd also be surprised if another document has superceded that. Perhaps some of the BE members who are currently serving in the Canadian Forces could tell us if that's so.
|
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9609698)
it looks like a step backwards for a country that has spent decades trying to establish its own identity.
I don't think that was ever an objective though. I suggest that the Liberal governments sought to dilute the Canadian identity by the promotion of multi-culturalism, (an objective I support, not generally liking Canadians and thinking anything's better than a country of Red Greens). The Harperitics seek to reverse this by providing a rallying point for jingoism and the promotion of a rah-rah-Canada philosophy. It seems to me that the Royals are empty symbols for this movement and that the real intent is to create a reverence for authority such as we see the GOP display toward the Stars and Stripes and, of course, to the OiC. All that said, I'm surprised that the Canadians had taken down the pictures of their monarch and renamed their boat, so I can't say that reversing these changes will much excite me. |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 9609758)
If it has, and I think that questionable, then, unless the objective truly was "America-Lite" I think it's failed.
I don't think that was ever an objective though. I suggest that the Liberal governments sought to dilute the Canadian identity by the promotion of multi-culturalism, (an objective I support, not generally liking Canadians and thinking anything's better than a country of Red Greens). The Harperitics seek to reverse this by providing a rallying point for jingoism and the promotion of a rah-rah-Canada philosophy. It seems to me that the Royals are empty symbols for this movement and that the real intent is to create a reverence for authority such as we see the GOP display toward the Stars and Stripes and, of course, to the OiC. All that said, I'm surprised that the Canadians had taken down the pictures of their monarch and renamed their boat, so I can't say that reversing these changes will much excite me. I suspect that your analysis is pretty close to the truth. It's clear that the govt is taking a much harder stance on effnik issues (eg the proposed reintroduction of the anti-terror laws). Maybe Harper is trying to bring back the "old Canada"? |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9609785)
Maybe Harper is trying to bring back the "old Canada"?
I don't much care for Mr. Harper's vision. If he wants to live in Dundalk ON or Cornerbrook NF, good luck to him, I'd rather have access to curry. |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
What a coup that would be for the Brits.
Interestingly this Tuesday HAARPer made all the embassies around the planet put up pictures of Queen Elizardbeth. :eek: |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
The Queen is still the Head of State. Would you believe it strange to find pictures of Obama in the equivalent US buildings. Storm in a teacup if you ask me.
|
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 9609860)
The Queen is still the Head of State. Would you believe it strange to find pictures of Obama in the equivalent US buildings. Storm in a teacup if you ask me.
This government is slashing spending all over the place. Why introduce seemingly pointless measures that will likely cost quite a lot of money? |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9609927)
I think you misunderstand the point here. Yes, she is still head of state. For many years, however, that has not been rammed in the faces of the wider world, or indeed, Canada. Now, it seems, it is to be. I'm trying to explore the possible reasons why.
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9609927)
This government is slashing spending all over the place. Why introduce seemingly pointless measures that will likely cost quite a lot of money?
I fail to see how a few piccies of Liz will cost loads of money and, again, you need to explain the justification for removing them and renaming everything by those previously in charge. |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 9609731)
I wasn't aware we'd ever 'left' the British Empire. When the armed forces unified in '68 and the navy and airforce lost the Royal designation every other corps kept their names. The ships were still called HMCS and still are, Royal Canadian Artillery, etc - none of that changed. Hat badges still have the crown on them and the Governor General is still in place as the Queen's representative in Canada, to whom the PM must go for permission to suspend/prorogue parliament/democracy and likely for a number of other things. I know that after unification in '70 thrrough '73 Canadian soldiers still swore their oath to the Queen and even though our constitution was repatriated in '81 I'd be surprised if they still don't. The statutes governing the military in Canada (as taught in basic training) were Queen's Regulations And Orders and I'd also be surprised if another document has superceded that. Perhaps some of the BE members who are currently serving in the Canadian Forces could tell us if that's so.
|
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 9609927)
. Why introduce seemingly pointless measures that will likely cost quite a lot of money?
Appeal to the core conservative vote? |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by MikeUK
(Post 9610126)
Forth coming election in Ontario?
Appeal to the core conservative vote? |
Re: Canada to rejoin British Empire?
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 9610170)
Is it only the Conservatives that believe that such a dignity should be afforded to the Head of State? Whom do the other supporters believe should be afforded such a dignity? Do they suggest that piccies of Liz should be replaced with piccies of Harper?;)
the second step is to recognize Stephen Harper as the appropriate head of state! Certainly the memo referring to the “Harper Government†as opposed to the “Government of Canada†might suggest that he as an Ego that could carry the role |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:41 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.