![]() |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Ah, now we're getting somewhere on Mr D. The longer lyrics are intriguing. Will have to explore further.
|
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Cabbagetown
(Post 11159842)
Canada and Quebec?
Presuming that nobody who chooses Canada to be his/her new home, nobody is interested in any independence debates of Quebec? Will there be a 3rd referendum? http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/...ty-crisis-3-0/ "The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind ..." :D SB - (accidental Quebecoise by adoption) |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 11161025)
Quebec didn't sign the Constitution.
Also, I think you actually meant that Quebec did not adopt the Charter of Rights. |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by FirstRatofftheShipUK
(Post 11167210)
Although a technical point, no one 'signs' the Constitution.
Also, I think you actually meant that Quebec did not adopt the Charter of Rights. |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11167225)
No. He means that Quebec didn't sign on to the Constitution.
I will grant you that, yes, by the 1982 round, there were political abstentions, including surrounding the non-adoption of the Charter, the same imbedded in the 1982 Constitution Act. |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by FirstRatofftheShipUK
(Post 11167210)
Although a technical point, no one 'signs' the Constitution.
Also, I think you actually meant that Quebec did not adopt the Charter of Rights. http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/...969/story.html |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by montreal mike
(Post 11167234)
what you refer to is the latest piece of nonsense from the separatists, not to be confused with the constitution of canada
http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/...969/story.html The Constitution of Canada; The 1982 Constitution Act; The Canadian Charter of Rights; and Quebec's Charter Although its apparently all Poutin to some. |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 11161696)
Ah, now we're getting somewhere on Mr D. The longer lyrics are intriguing. Will have to explore further.
She's insane:( |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Flogger
(Post 11168677)
She wants me to grow a moustache on my face
She's insane:( He's a-runnin' for office on the ballot note He's out there preachin' in front of the steeple Tellin' me he loves all kinds-a people (He's eatin' bagels He's eatin' pizza He's eatin' chitlins). |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
I am actually not very happy about Pauline and her political rhetoric, and let's hope it's just blindness rhetoric. Everything good will stay in Quebec, anything bad will go to the rest of Canada.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada. If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then. After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown? Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution? Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline. |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Cabbagetown
(Post 11169239)
I am actually not very happy about Pauline and her political rhetoric, and let's hope it's just blindness rhetoric. Everything good will stay in Quebec, anything bad will go to the rest of Canada.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada. If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then. After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown? Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution? Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline. |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Who would go to war against the First Nations in Quebec to try and take their land? The reserves along the US border could probably beat the SQ by themselves right now if they had to.
|
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Cabbagetown
(Post 11169239)
I am actually not very happy about Pauline and her political rhetoric, and let's hope it's just blindness rhetoric. Everything good will stay in Quebec, anything bad will go to the rest of Canada.
She seems to think that Quebec won't have any borders or tolls, however the rest of Canada could impose just that. And what about all these Canadian federal jobs in Quebec? Does she think they'll stay there once Quebec gets independent? Same as immigration! In the event of Quebec getting independence, anybody from Quebec would quite possibly be subject to Canadian Immigration legislation, like any other immigrant wanting to settle in Canada. If Quebec would actually be a new country one day, how much "land" would she get? Would it be only about the southern third of Quebec that was part of "New France" and later on became the British Province of Quebec at the Treaty of Paris in 1763? Back then, the French didn't own land up north of that and the area around Hudson's Bay was "Rupert's land" and was actually a British territory back then. After the "Treaty of Paris" which was in 1763, "New France" became British territory, the British Province of Quebec and the Crown's land now the Canadian Crown's land. Can French speaking Quebec separatists take land that doesn't belong to them but belongs to Canada and the Crown? Who exactly would actually keep the land, like national parks and Indian reserves? As far as I know, in Quebec this land is under the jurisdiction of the Canadian federal government (the big Crown) according to the Canadian Constitution? Next time, please your brain and try to think, Pauline. And the natives in Quebec always say they wish to remain part of Canada if Quebec goes so how does that get dealt with? |
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11169582)
Who would go to war against the First Nations in Quebec to try and take their land? The reserves along the US border could probably beat the SQ by themselves right now if they had to.
|
Re: Canada and Quebec? and the future
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 11170995)
The last time the natives got really stroppy, it took more than the SQ to sort it out. Try Googling Oka Crisis.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:16 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.