![]() |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11870848)
I wouldn't mind to living to an old age provided I am in reasonably good health, especially in the brain.
What point is there to living an old age if you end up in hospital bed for 10-15 years not really there with no real clue of what is going on? I couldn't even try and start to have any reasonable idea of how long I may live, I seem to have gotten at the less desirable genes from both sides health wise.... JS, set the target to 80 like your past family members achieved:thumbsup: BTW, would you consider me 'as old'? . |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11870870)
seeing that you're in your late 30's, would you consider living till age 50 that you've accomplished a milestone?
JS, set the target to 80 like you past family did:thumbsup: BTW, would you consider me 'as old'? If I died at 50, it wouldn't be much of an accomplishment considering how late into life I have started things most start in their 20's..... From my perspective someone in their 70's is old, not ancient, but certainly old. My parents in their late 50's (58 now) are also what I would consider old, but there are also people who consider me old, all depends how old you are as to what is old... My sister in laws kid (6) saw my grey in my 4 day old beard and said, " you must be really old and pointed to the grey." but to a 5 year old I would certainly be considered old...:lol: For the record I am 8 years younger then her parents are. At 20, 40 seemed old, at 36, 40 doesn't seem so old anymore. |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11870848)
My dads side....
My great grandfather on that side.... My uncle on my dads side... My dad died at 51 but he had older relatives. My mother in law is a sprightly 77 and has outlived three daughters who all died of different things over a period of about 8 years. Lost her husband in that period too. |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11870894)
I'm less convinced about this 'side' thing than I was. My mum is 83 next month and her parents went into their 80s while an aunt went into her 90s. Mum still drives, although now recovering from a hip replacement replacement which she managed to dislocate twice. :ohmy:
My dad died at 51 but he had older relatives. My mother in law is a sprightly 77 and has outlived three daughters who all died of different things over a period of about 8 years. Lost her husband in that period too. |
Re: The age old question
JS @ post #17 interesting point of view
So back to the thread title Seems most folks think anyone older than they are are considered 'old'. JS point about being 'ancient' is valid, but only when everyone they know who older than them have died. Baring any freak accidents, communicable diseases, act god or of war The guideline predictor or indicator of 'how long you will live' is to look at past family members age of death, have you yourself lived a healthy, fruitful & happy life. Is your outlook positive - do any of you 'the BE members' want to live to 100 years old - I certainly do? |
Re: The age old question
How much do these average life expectancy figures change if you take out accidental deaths (car accidents, etc)? Anybody know where to look for figures like that?
|
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11870870)
BTW, would you consider me 'as old'?
. |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11870924)
JS @ post #17 interesting point of view
So back to the thread title Seems most folks think anyone older than they are are considered 'old'. JS point about being 'ancient' is valid, but only when everyone they know who older than them have died. Baring any freak accidents, communicable diseases, act god or of war The guideline predictor or indicator of 'how long you will live' is to look at past family members age of death, have you yourself lived a healthy, fruitful & happy life. Is your outlook positive - do any of you 'the BE members' want to live to 100 years old - I certainly do? I'm benchmarking 120 as 150 is somewhat unrealistic. :) |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11870924)
The guideline predictor or indicator of 'how long you will live' is to look at past family members age of death, have you yourself lived a healthy, fruitful & happy life. Is your outlook positive...
|
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11871473)
And then, of course, there's The Death Clock - When Am I Going To Die? :lol:
When I went through it at that time ... based on my age, non smoker, low BMI & lifestyle, the results weren't too good coming in somewhere in the 73 age range. Maybe stats Canada as I indicated in my OP use the non scientific 'death clock' Live life long & prosper ;) edit: I redid the death clock, my terminal date came in at October 2020 Re-entered a different birth date 10 years later, result was October 2030 entering a birth date of January 1943- result is my time is up this year in 2016 conclusion: the death clock is set to anyone, no matter what age they are, to terminate at age 73 . |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11871511)
you posted that one previously.
When I went through it at that time ... based on my age, non smoker, low BMI & lifestyle, the results weren't too good coming in somewhere in the 73 age range. Maybe stats Canada as I indicated in my OP use the non scientific 'death clock' Live life long & prosper ;) edit: I redid the death clock, my terminal date came in at October 2020 Re-entered a different birth date 10 years later, result was October 2030 entering a birth date of January 1943- result is my time is up this year in 2016 conclusion: the death clock is set to anyone, no matter what age they are, to terminate at age 73 . |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11871511)
conclusion: the death clock is set to anyone, no matter what age they are, to terminate at age 73
. It is a fluff website. About as deep as a Daily Mail article. |
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by Partially discharged
(Post 11871543)
It is a fluff website.
|
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 11870609)
Statistically, someone who has reached 65 must have a higher life expectancy than the general population.
|
Re: The age old question
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11872123)
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:46 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.