Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Canada > The Maple Leaf
Reload this Page >

36.5km skydive attempt today

36.5km skydive attempt today

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 14th 2012, 8:32 pm
  #31  
Nuther day in paradise.ca
 
magnumpi's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 7,263
magnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

I think he should do it again, but this time tandem and I'll go along with my own go pro....:@)

FYI He did a speed of Mach 1.24 OMG

Last edited by magnumpi; Oct 14th 2012 at 9:07 pm.
magnumpi is offline  
Old Oct 14th 2012, 9:20 pm
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Durham Region Extension
Posts: 3,342
ultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

Someone is going to try and better this soon...there ain't going to be a wait of 50 odd year or so

Perhaps Richard flippin' Branson?
ultrarunner is offline  
Old Oct 14th 2012, 9:27 pm
  #33  
Nuther day in paradise.ca
 
magnumpi's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 7,263
magnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond reputemagnumpi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

Originally Posted by ultrarunner
Someone is going to try and better this soon...there ain't going to be a wait of 50 odd year or so

Perhaps Richard flippin' Branson?
I don't think so IMO. It cost 100's of 1,000's just to fill the balloon with eelium. It would take a extreem big budget from a big sponsor. I don't see Red Bull wanting to do it again.
magnumpi is offline  
Old Oct 14th 2012, 11:02 pm
  #34  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 583
exenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond reputeexenglishman has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

Originally Posted by magnumpi
I don't think so IMO. It cost 100's of 1,000's just to fill the balloon with eelium. It would take a extreem big budget from a big sponsor. I don't see Red Bull wanting to do it again.
I disagree. Companies will be signing up to do something like this, huge exposure, they have been involved with breaking 2 world records and making history. Over 7 million watching it, and that was just live. I definitely see Richard Branson wanting to be involved. That or Red Bull's competitor, Monster.
exenglishman is offline  
Old Oct 15th 2012, 1:53 pm
  #35  
Pictou County Superstar™
Thread Starter
 
Greenhill's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: On top of the Green hill, NS
Posts: 4,219
Greenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

I'm curious if he did that deliberately to leave Kittinger's record intact, as a tribute.

Apparently Kittinger opened his parachute at 5500m, a lot higher than Baumgartner. I'm not sure if that's height above elevation or sea level though. I also understand that Kittinger wasn't totally in freefall as he was towing a small drogue parachute - I suppose Baumgartner had the option of doing this too but he must have desired capturing the speed record above everything else.

So the question is, could Baumgartner have broken the freefall record yesterday, by opening his parachute later and still land uninjured?

I believe the answer is "yes" and here's why:

Baumgartner Freefall time: 4 mins 20 seconds (BBC)
Parachute opened 2516m above sea level (BBC)
Roswell elevation:1089m (Wikipedia)
Distance to ground when parachute opened: 2516-1089=1427m

Kittinger freefall: 4mins 36 seconds (wikipedia)
Difference between freefall times: 4:36-4:20=16 seconds
Therefore, 17 seconds required to beat the existing record

Terminal velocity of a skydiver (no open parachute): 200km/h or 55.6m/s (Various)
17seconds*55.6m=945m (3100ft)

Distance from ground when parachute had to be opened to break the freefall record:1427m-945m=482m

When to open a parachute (lowest heights allowed or possible):
Requirement: 610m (2000ft)(allowing time for issues to be resolved or reserve parachute to be used)
Reserve minimum: 213m (700ft)
Military: 152m (500ft)
Base jump: 30m (requires fast opening chute, not designed for high speed)


So, although he'd have to open his chute when under 482m, which is way under the US requirement of 610m, he'd still be above the height limits that someone of his parachuting experience could handle without getting injured.

So that's my guess, that he deliberately avoided taking Kittinger's freefall record, probably out of respect and a way of thanking him for the help.



Originally Posted by magnumpi
Think he may have pulled his Shute a bit early. Otherwise perfect!!!
Greenhill is offline  
Old Oct 15th 2012, 2:07 pm
  #36  
Magnificently Withering
 
Oakvillian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 6,892
Oakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond reputeOakvillian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

Originally Posted by Greenhill
I'm curious if he did that deliberately to leave Kittinger's record intact, as a tribute.

Apparently Kittinger opened his parachute at 5500m, a lot higher than Baumgartner. I'm not sure if that's height above elevation or sea level though. I also understand that Kittinger wasn't totally in freefall as he was towing a small drogue parachute - I suppose Baumgartner had the option of doing this too but he must have desired capturing the speed record above everything else.

So the question is, could Baumgartner have broken the freefall record yesterday, by opening his parachute later and still land uninjured?

I believe the answer is "yes" and here's why:

[...]

So that's my guess, that he deliberately avoided taking Kittinger's freefall record, probably out of respect and a way of thanking him for the help.
I suppose he might have done this as a deliberate nod to Kittinger. However, given the most-publicised record attempts were speed and exit height, I don't think it's likely to habe been a consideration. Freefall duration (in my limited understanding - I've never parachuted) is increased by presenting the largest possible surface area, the arms-and-legs-out star shape. High descent speed is the opposite of that, presenting a small profile by dropping head-first. I suspect the freefall duration record was never in Baumgartner's sights.
Oakvillian is offline  
Old Oct 15th 2012, 2:17 pm
  #37  
Pictou County Superstar™
Thread Starter
 
Greenhill's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: On top of the Green hill, NS
Posts: 4,219
Greenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond reputeGreenhill has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

That makes sense, in that higher/faster are not recipe ingredients for a longer freefall.

Given that the jump can be made from a much lower height, that speed can be controlled by body shape and the use of a drogue is allowed, breaking the freefall record will be easy when compared to what Baumgartner achieved yesterday.

Any takers? There's got to be at least one forum member with parachuting experience and the military links that could fly him up 30+km??

Originally Posted by Oakvillian
I suppose he might have done this as a deliberate nod to Kittinger. However, given the most-publicised record attempts were speed and exit height, I don't think it's likely to habe been a consideration. Freefall duration (in my limited understanding - I've never parachuted) is increased by presenting the largest possible surface area, the arms-and-legs-out star shape. High descent speed is the opposite of that, presenting a small profile by dropping head-first. I suspect the freefall duration record was never in Baumgartner's sights.
Greenhill is offline  
Old Oct 15th 2012, 2:31 pm
  #38  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Almost Canadian's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: South of Calgary
Posts: 13,378
Almost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond reputeAlmost Canadian has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

Originally Posted by Oakvillian
I suppose he might have done this as a deliberate nod to Kittinger. However, given the most-publicised record attempts were speed and exit height, I don't think it's likely to habe been a consideration. Freefall duration (in my limited understanding - I've never parachuted) is increased by presenting the largest possible surface area, the arms-and-legs-out star shape. High descent speed is the opposite of that, presenting a small profile by dropping head-first. I suspect the freefall duration record was never in Baumgartner's sights.
I agree with this. I would like to know if his opening was controlled by him or his altimeter. He may have had no choice when to deploy. Opening a chute at such a low height as has been suggested above after falling from such a height would be very foolish IMO.
Almost Canadian is offline  
Old Oct 15th 2012, 5:41 pm
  #39  
Moderαtor Emeritus
 
iaink's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 30,768
iaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond reputeiaink has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

Is anyone going to remember this guys name a year from now?


More importantly, how many people are going to start drinking Red Bull because of this...
iaink is offline  
Old Oct 15th 2012, 5:53 pm
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Durham Region Extension
Posts: 3,342
ultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond reputeultrarunner has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 36.5km skydive attempt today

It's like the Olympics, everyone gets caught up in the hoopla, but once it's done, it's onto the next best thing. Remember the walk over Niagara falls?

How many people even buy the Guinness book of records these days? I remember owning copies back in the 80s and early 90s, just for pub / student union bar quiz nights

I drank a few Red Bulls during University days, but noticed it isn't as big here compared to continental Europe. You walk into any petrol station today, and there is a myriad of similar drinks on the shelves with funky names to entice the teens and the 20 somethings

Last edited by ultrarunner; Oct 15th 2012 at 5:57 pm.
ultrarunner is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.