![]() |
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 10400280)
I suppose the point of picking new names is so that the player who's just made points still has the potential to make more with 5 nominations same as all other players. Thus success isn't punished, but rewarded. In football would you have a player who scores a goal sent off for the remainder of the game so his team can play shorthanded?
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by PeterF
(Post 10400213)
I was thinking of doing an entry at the start, glad I didn't now though.
Just don't agree with this pick another one thing, may as well have picked 100 names from the start, thought the whole idea was pick 6 (or whatever) and the one who gets the most from the original 6 wins. Whats the point of picking new names. Make a crap competition even more crap. |
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 9846956)
Hmmmmm
Lindsey Lohan (joker) Michael Douglas Maggie T Zsa Zsa Gabor Clive Dunn |
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 10400945)
ok - can I have Phil the Greek pl :)
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 10400829)
Grumpy old git. I'm looking forward to 2013 when I can join in this enterprise. I'm working on names already and am pretty sure there will be a couple of HRHs on my list.
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
All hail Bats! Keeper of the spreadsheets! 4bells, Zsa Zsa's like the Black Knight in Holy Grail, and more power to her.
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 10400958)
Ladies and Gentlemen: we have a volunteer for the prestigious position of 2013 Keeper of the Spreadsheet of Gloom. :thumbup:
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 10401026)
er no. As that would mean I will have to pay attention.
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 10401050)
Oh no it doesn't. Just keep half an eye on the thread like I do. I've never even heard of many of the runners and certainly wouldn't know (or care) if they'd croaked if someone didn't mention it on here. Easy peasy.
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 10401171)
well then you're fine just carrying on as you are. It's not as if you do anything at work anyway.
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 10401199)
Fair cop. BTW, the Argos have kicked arse in first half.
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 10401258)
Who'd have thought? A Toronto sports team that can actually play well!!!! :p
Oh, hang on. |
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 10400958)
Ladies and Gentlemen: we have a volunteer for the prestigious position of 2013 Keeper of the Spreadsheet of Gloom. :thumbup:
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
For 2013 do we keep our existing picks .... Maybe there should some additional ruling along the lines of 1 person per decade so you can't pick 4 x 90 yr olds to increase your chances ... Or am I thinking into this too much?!
|
Re: The 2012 Celebrity Croakers Thread.
Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon
(Post 10401418)
For 2013 do we keep our existing picks .... Maybe there should some additional ruling along the lines of 1 person per decade so you can't pick 4 x 90 yr olds to increase your chances ... Or am I thinking into this too much?!
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:11 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.