refusing visas
#16
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 369
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by touchingcloth
I thought most these visas are rejected at the acknowlegment stage.
i.e if you apply for a skilled visa and don't have a skill ...then you'd be rejected before acknowledgment and a 6 month+ wait.
Maybe wrong about this one though.
TC
i.e if you apply for a skilled visa and don't have a skill ...then you'd be rejected before acknowledgment and a 6 month+ wait.
Maybe wrong about this one though.
TC
Have fun
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
#17
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Blighty
Posts: 950
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by WESTLY
An invalid application is not too bad, at least you get your money back, eventually. If you want to know what percentage of skilled visa applications are refused why not email ASPC and ak? If they are not forthcoming try a Freedom of Information Request. I could tell you, but that would spoil your fun.
Have fun
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
Have fun
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
Don't MARA agents have to provide a duty of care to their client, in that they shouldn't take on an application unless the applicant would have a good chance of a successful outcome.
I reckon most applications are refused due to a lack of evidence to substantiate the validity of the application.
TC
#18
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 369
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by touchingcloth
I doubt many applications sent through MARA regsitered agents are refused.
Don't MARA agents have to provide a duty of care to their client, in that they shouldn't take on an application unless the applicant would have a good chance of a successful outcome.
I reckon most applications are refused due to a lack of evidence to substantiate the validity of the application.
TC
Don't MARA agents have to provide a duty of care to their client, in that they shouldn't take on an application unless the applicant would have a good chance of a successful outcome.
I reckon most applications are refused due to a lack of evidence to substantiate the validity of the application.
TC
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
#19
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Blighty
Posts: 950
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by WESTLY
If you are willing to wager that unrepresented skilled visa applicants have a lower success rate that those represented by registered migration agents, let me know how much you are willing to lose.
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
then please enlighten us why wouldn't using an agent be more beneficial.
unless they purposely screw up an application
#20
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by touchingcloth
then please enlighten us why wouldn't using an agent be more beneficial.
unless they purposely screw up an application
unless they purposely screw up an application
#21
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by RegisteredAgent
On average Dima reject 4 out of 5 visas. This is based on international figures and was discussed at the CPD conference I attended in Italy in July. There are over 1 million applications for skilled visas to DIMA each year, and only 250 000 are granted each year. Now these arent concrete figures, just something I remember from my discussions with the group. You can download statistics from DIMAs website
This is taken directly from Australian Parliamentary website:
Today, the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) allocates around 130 000 to 140 000 migration places each year—the highest level in twenty years—with a firm focus on bringing in migrants with the relevant skills to complement Australia’s labour market needs and skill shortages. In 2005-06, 97 500 places have been allocated for skilled migration, the largest number ever allocated.
#22
Banned
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by dotnron
Don't know what the CPD conference in Italy is, or what it has to do with migration to Australia, but the figures given there are very inaccurate. Perhaps instead of quoting Lorenzo Boccabela, you could try reading something from Australia.
This is taken directly from Australian Parliamentary website:
Today, the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) allocates around 130 000 to 140 000 migration places each year—the highest level in twenty years—with a firm focus on bringing in migrants with the relevant skills to complement Australia’s labour market needs and skill shortages. In 2005-06, 97 500 places have been allocated for skilled migration, the largest number ever allocated.
This is taken directly from Australian Parliamentary website:
Today, the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) allocates around 130 000 to 140 000 migration places each year—the highest level in twenty years—with a firm focus on bringing in migrants with the relevant skills to complement Australia’s labour market needs and skill shortages. In 2005-06, 97 500 places have been allocated for skilled migration, the largest number ever allocated.
Now before we all start panicking...
I am talking about the total number of visas rejected in Australia per year. I am not talking soley about skills applications etc. Like I said, this was in a conversation between myself and about 8 other registered agents. I have no concrete evidence on this, I am simply repeating what was said to me.
If you want to maximise your chances then either use a registered agent or read below;
If you lodge your visa application ONSHORE and it is rejected you gain MRT rights and you can appeal. If the MRT reject your case you can then apply for ministerial discretion. The minister must answer ALL cases put forward to him or her.
If you lodge offshore you do not get MRT rights. Therefore it is always better in questionable cases to lodge your application onshore.
Ryan Kroonenburg
RMA #0531502
http://www.askamigrationagent.com
#23
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 369
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by touchingcloth
then please enlighten us why wouldn't using an agent be more beneficial.
unless they purposely screw up an application
unless they purposely screw up an application
The current skilled visa refusal rate is less than 10 percent.
Visa applicants who are not native English speakers are more likely to engage the services of an agent than, say, UK applicants who have DIMA's Anglo bias operating in their favour. There is massive bias, some of it legislated, that acts to the detriment of applicants from poor countries, particularly poor Asian countries.
Applicants who have the best prospects of success are the ones who are most likely to represent themselves.
To be truly enlightened find out what difference professional representation makes in your neck of the woods.
Westly Russell
RMA 0316072
#24
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by RegisteredAgent
The CPD conference is a conference in which all registered migration agents have to attend each year in order to maintain their registration. That article is simply about the number of visas available, not the number of visas granted or applied for.
If you lodge your visa application ONSHORE and it is rejected you gain MRT rights and you can appeal. If the MRT reject your case you can then apply for ministerial discretion. The minister must answer ALL cases put forward to him or her.
If you lodge offshore you do not get MRT rights. Therefore it is always better in questionable cases to lodge your application onshore.
Ryan Kroonenburg
RMA #0531502
http://www.askamigrationagent.com
Ryan Kroonenburg
RMA #0531502
http://www.askamigrationagent.com
Family sponsored (including skilled sponsored) and employer sponsored applicants get MRT rights through the sponsor.
#25
Re: refusing visas
[QUOTE=RegisteredAgent] That article is simply about the number of visas available, not the number of visas granted or applied for.
So, explain then for us how if there are 97,500 skilled visas available 250,000 are granted each year?
So, explain then for us how if there are 97,500 skilled visas available 250,000 are granted each year?
#26
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by RegisteredAgent
On average Dima reject 4 out of 5 visas. This is based on international figures and was discussed at the CPD conference I attended in Italy in July. There are over 1 million applications for skilled visas to DIMA each year, and only 250 000 are granted each year. Now these arent concrete figures, just something I remember from my discussions with the group. You can download statistics from DIMAs website
I think the correct figures for General Skilled Migration applications are that the approval rate is closer to 90%, noticeably higher for those using agents. Refusal rates aren't published but an idea of processing numbers can be found here: http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports...manitarian.htm
Cheers,
George Lombard
#27
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Blighty
Posts: 950
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by George Lombard
Dear RA,
I think the correct figures for General Skilled Migration applications are that the approval rate is closer to 90%, noticeably higher for those using agents. Refusal rates aren't published but an idea of processing numbers can be found here: http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports...manitarian.htm
Cheers,
George Lombard
I think the correct figures for General Skilled Migration applications are that the approval rate is closer to 90%, noticeably higher for those using agents. Refusal rates aren't published but an idea of processing numbers can be found here: http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports...manitarian.htm
Cheers,
George Lombard
Regarding Westly's point: "To be truly enlightened find out what difference professional representation makes in your neck of the woods".
Would you have any comment about this? (Possibly from case you've taken from 'high-risk countries)
For what its worth...although from a we're from a high risk country we used an agent based in the UK who deals predominatly with British application,...and we found no obstacles.
#28
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 23,400
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by touchingcloth
Thanks George,
Regarding Westly's point: "To be truly enlightened find out what difference professional representation makes in your neck of the woods".
Would you have any comment about this? (Possibly from case you've taken from 'high-risk countries)
For what its worth...although from a we're from a high risk country we used an agent based in the UK who deals predominatly with British application,...and we found no obstacles.
Regarding Westly's point: "To be truly enlightened find out what difference professional representation makes in your neck of the woods".
Would you have any comment about this? (Possibly from case you've taken from 'high-risk countries)
For what its worth...although from a we're from a high risk country we used an agent based in the UK who deals predominatly with British application,...and we found no obstacles.
I too wondered about this statement. Im glad we have used an agent and await with interest with regards to when we will get our visa and whether or not the hoops through which we have to jump, will be higher because of my husband being from a high risk country.
#29
Banned
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
Re: refusing visas
Originally Posted by George Lombard
Dear RA,
I think the correct figures for General Skilled Migration applications are that the approval rate is closer to 90%, noticeably higher for those using agents. Refusal rates aren't published but an idea of processing numbers can be found here: http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports...manitarian.htm
Cheers,
George Lombard
I think the correct figures for General Skilled Migration applications are that the approval rate is closer to 90%, noticeably higher for those using agents. Refusal rates aren't published but an idea of processing numbers can be found here: http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports...manitarian.htm
Cheers,
George Lombard