Employment Check- BY DIAC
#17
Forum Regular




Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 281










Invitation to comment
is an objection letter stating their doubts...and finally saying that you are not eligible to meet the basic requirements of the visa...28 days time will given to answer the doubts...it is when the phone verification fails......
Only 1 in 1000 recovers when invitation to comment comes....
is an objection letter stating their doubts...and finally saying that you are not eligible to meet the basic requirements of the visa...28 days time will given to answer the doubts...it is when the phone verification fails......
Only 1 in 1000 recovers when invitation to comment comes....
Could you please tell me what is this (invitation to comment) .
Is it asked by your CO. if YES tehn on what grounds . etc.
Thanks

#19

No it's not. Please stop giving information that you cannot back up with proof. The invitation to comment is used for many reasons, not simply 'phone verification failure' nor does 'only 1 in 1000 pass it'.
If you wish to post information here you are going to have to back it up with proof, not simply speculation - it does nothing to help and only serves to upset and frighten posters.
If you wish to post information here you are going to have to back it up with proof, not simply speculation - it does nothing to help and only serves to upset and frighten posters.

#20
Forum Regular



Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 190


No it's not. Please stop giving information that you cannot back up with proof. The invitation to comment is used for many reasons, not simply 'phone verification failure' nor does 'only 1 in 1000 pass it'.
If you wish to post information here you are going to have to back it up with proof, not simply speculation - it does nothing to help and only serves to upset and frighten posters.
If you wish to post information here you are going to have to back it up with proof, not simply speculation - it does nothing to help and only serves to upset and frighten posters.
he applied in June 2006
and got rejected in August 2008


#21
Banned




Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Heaven on Earth
Posts: 437


What you said bout invitation to comment is totally wrong. Look at the DIAC site and do some research and you will understand it.
Read Booklet 6 as well.

#22
Just Joined

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 29


Hi All,
In my document checklist status for "Evidence of Specific Work Experience " & "Evidence of work experience" both are in MET status. Does it mean that they have done the emplyment check and it is clear or they exempted me from this check (I am from HR country). As I remember from some of the posts that many people had their status as "Further Investigation Required".
Please share any information if anyone has.
In my document checklist status for "Evidence of Specific Work Experience " & "Evidence of work experience" both are in MET status. Does it mean that they have done the emplyment check and it is clear or they exempted me from this check (I am from HR country). As I remember from some of the posts that many people had their status as "Further Investigation Required".
Please share any information if anyone has.

#23
Forum Regular

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 31


Hi, I have a question if someone can help me. I do not have the bank statement for my employment becasue I get cash for my salary however, I do have the tax returns, emplyment contracts, payslips etc. Will i be in trouble fro not having the bank statment please some on explain me

#24
Banned




Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 340


Hi, I have a question if someone can help me. I do not have the bank statement for my employment becasue I get cash for my salary however, I do have the tax returns, emplyment contracts, payslips etc. Will i be in trouble fro not having the bank statment please some on explain me
I hope it helps.

#25
Forum Regular



Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 190


[QUOTE=Mukesam;7625329]It all depends on your CO, if he/she is satisfied with the evidence you have provided, you won't be asked to provide additional docs (like bank statement etc) but if your evidence is not sufficient then he/she may ask you for additional evidence.
I hope it helps.[/QUOTA
Any Case officer willl be satisfied only with experience reference letter & no other documents?
I hope it helps.[/QUOTA
Any Case officer willl be satisfied only with experience reference letter & no other documents?

#26
Banned




Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 340


Any Case officer willl be satisfied only with experience reference letter & no other documents?
It is common sense that if your ref, exp letter, contract letter and pay slips provide powerful evidence of your employment then why a CO would go for Tax and bank docs? Some times if you evidence is so strong, they don't even go for a phone or physical verifications. It has happened to so many people on this forum.

#27
Forum Regular

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 31


Thanks very much for your response. Will I provide the evidence like payslips, tax returns for every month of the period for which I am claiming points. For examaple if I am cliaiming for the last three years do I have to provide all the pay slips for the whole period

#28
Banned




Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 340


Well, I have picked first four months of an year and scanned payslips of those months of the last 5 years. Compiled one file for each year; that makes 4 pdf files of pay slips and uploaded them.

#29

As I said, if you are unable to back up your claims with evidence, please refrain from posting rumours.

#30
Forum Regular



Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 190


So your friend from Pakistan got rejected. What about the other 998 out of 1000 people you quoted earlier? Or the people who were invited to comment after other forms of employment verification. One person's experience does not mean it is policy for every applicant.
As I said, if you are unable to back up your claims with evidence, please refrain from posting rumours.
As I said, if you are unable to back up your claims with evidence, please refrain from posting rumours.
so what should i do now?
